I know that sufficient assumption questions essentially have a formula you can go by in order to reach the answer. Are there any other questions that I should approach in the same way? Sufficient assumption questions do seem easily approachable/easily mastered by using a formula so I wanted to ask if there are any other question types like this!
LSAT
New post209 posts in the last 30 days
Hi is someone able to walk me through this LR question? In general, I struggle with sufficient assumption (SA) and pseudo-SA questions (even though I know JY calls them freebies), so I would love to have general tips for getting these right as well as the one pertaining to PTB S4 Q4 (the one that talks about political self-determination). Thank you so so so much in advance!
Can someone please explain why C is right? What is the type of theft? #help
I am struggling to understand how this answer is supported by the stimulus. To run through my thoughts:
A: irrelevant, there is nothing about clams in the passage
B: irrelevant, we are not discussing the mussels spreading to the Mississippi or the effects on the pear industry
C: we don't have any information about removing the mussels from the areas they clog
D: This is the one I picked though I went back and forth between D and E. I picked D because it seemed to be the most related to the stimulus. The stimulus talks about how the mussels clog the intake pipes at the beginning and then transitions to talking about how bags of mussels suspended in discharge streams help clean water. I assumed without proof that the algae would just clog intake pipes as well.
E: This one seems like a logical conclusion, but I didn't think there was enough direct support in the stimulus to justify this conclusion. It seems like quite a jump to me to assume that the mussels will need to be discarded as hazardous waste.
Any advice or help on making the assumptions that need to be made in MSS problems? #help
Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question" Also, please do not post the entire question and answer choices for the LSAC question, this is copyrighted content and is against the Forum Rules
Potatoes -> has solanine (poisonous in large quantities) -most-> solanine in the skin.
Domestic potatoes -> has small quantities (so not poisonous)
Wild potatoes -> poisonous level of solanine (must be in large number).
So peeled wild potatoes =safe= unpeeled domestic tomatoes
What to warrant that the wild potatoes fall within this MOST group where the solanine stays in the skin?
A. So the amount of solanine in the skin of wild potatoes is more than the skin of domesticated potatoes. So peeling the skin of wild potatoes wouldn’t make it safer to eat than domesticated potatoes? Not at least as safe as
B. So removing this means removing the poisonous part.
C. So the peeled wild potato has the same amount of solanine as an unpeeled domesticated potato. Yes, as safe as.
D. Why does this matter.
E. Size doesn’t matter, its the quantity of solanine.
Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question"
For the past 10 months I've been studying part time for the LSAT. Out of all the sections, RC has consistently given me the most trouble and has been the most difficult section for me to improve on. From my diagnostic test to now, I've only been able to manage going from -15 to -10 (sometimes -8/-9 on a good day). I'm at a loss and I'm not sure what else I can do to improve. This section has been holding me back big time and is part of the reason why score fluctuates so greatly. If anyone has any tips on how I can improve, study, and review this section better, please let me know. I think my biggest issue is not having a strategy when going into RC and immediately feeling intimated/nervous about completing the section. Any advice or words of encouragement would be appreciated.
Why is the answer to this question C and not B?
Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question"
Hi Friends!
I'm wondering when I should use the lawgic notation vs when not to use it.. sometimes it's less challenging for me to rely on intuition + general understanding than to draw the relationships.. and the thing is that often times by the time I figure out that I need to use lawgic - it's already too late and I need to pass over to the next question..
any thoughts??
Thanks!!
I don't get how (a) can strengthen the argument. It says "several species of shellfish and seabirds in the North Sea waters.." but how can being in the North Sea help the conclusion? Isn't it also possible that those shellfish and seabirds died because of the distemper virus, not the pollution?
Hi, so I've been having trouble building a consistent timing strategy for the RC section. Sometimes, I think I'm taking too long on certain passages but after I blind review I see that I am like 3 minutes faster than the suggested time. A lot of times I could have taken longer to have a higher accuracy rate, but I didn't, unfortunately. How do I know on which passages to slow down on? I use my intuition most of the time. I find that I'm just as accurate on blind review as on the actual drill or test practice but I want to get better and finish the section on time. I hope this makes sense. I just want to improve my accuracy rate as much as possible with a good timing strategy. I would appreciate any advice.
Can someone help me find the conclusion in this passage? Its prep test B section 4 question 25.
Can anyone explain their reasoning for PT 3 Section 4 Question 20 - will never understand it for the life of me.
Hi, is there a way to choose logic games that you specifically want to improve your speed on without having to take the whole preptest again? I know there are drills for different types of logic games, but I want to choose specific logic games that I want to redo and improve my speed on. Is there a way I can do that with the drill format?
Why is B the right answer for a strengthen if the reverse could also be true: what if those who can copy angles can copy curves just means the other comes first. Isn't the key to the argument the idea that one is before? #help
Is the August 2023 LSAT going to be different, I heard online that they are changing the LG section in 2023. Wondering if that was real or not and if there is going to be any change to the August LSAT.
Can someone explain why the correct answer choice is C for PT 9, Section 4, Question 20?
Can someone explain why the correct answer choice is A for PT 9, Section 2, Question 20?
The correct answer is A-fails to rule out the possibility that a true belief can have deleterious consequences.
While the AC by itself is reasonable, I am just not seeing how it is a flaw in the argument's reasoning.
I identified the conclusion as the first sentence of the stem, is this where I'm messing up?
Hey 7Sagers,
Here's the official April 2023 LSAT Discussion Thread.
REMINDER: Under your Candidate Agreement, you may not discuss the details of any specific LSAT questions at any time. For the April 2023 LSAT, general discussion of what sections you had, or how difficult you found a given section, or speculation about which sections were scored or unscored, is prohibited until after 9pm ET, Tuesday, April 18th.
Posts that violate these rules will be taken down and may result in disciplinary action from LSAC. Let’s work together to ensure the test is fair to everyone, and not share information before everyone has taken the test.
Some examples of typical comments:
✅ The following comments are okay 🙆♀️
❌ The following comments are over the line 🙅♂️
Good luck to everyone taking the April 2023!
**Please keep all discussions of the April 2023 LSAT here!**(/red)
How did you guys determine C was the answer for PTB S1 Q23
Hello!
Could someone please help me figure this AP question out? There's no explanation video for it. The median score of someone who got it right is a 173, and I am aiming for a 170+.
Stimulus: "One can be at home and be in the backyard, that is, not in one's house at all...."
Question Stem: "Which one of the following most accurately describes the relationship between the argument's conclusion and its claim that one can be at home without being in one's house?"
Answer Choices:
A. (not correct)
B. (not correct)
C. (CORRECT)
D. (not correct, this is the one I chose)
E. (not correct)
Admin Note: Edited. It is against our Forum Rules to write out the entire LSAT question and answer choices on the Forum.
Could someone explain why the correct answer is C? I am so confused
Can someone explain how D is the correct answer to PTB S1 Q16? Is it correct because it simply has no impact on the argument?
I would like to see a video breakdown of this question
Admin Note: Edited titled. Please use the format "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of question"
My proctoru indicates I have no break in my test in the rules, I thought we got a 10 minut break after section 2?