User Avatar
Lia24788
Joined
Feb 2026
Subscription
Live

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided Goal score: 180
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
2027

Discussions

User Avatar
Lia24788
Wednesday, Apr 8

I thought I was lost but turn out I'm not that lost lol 4/5

2
User Avatar
Lia24788
Wednesday, Apr 8

Ya, I'm lost now

3
User Avatar
Lia24788
Edited Tuesday, Mar 31

4/5 well I should say 4.5/5 #3 I added black holes cause I thought it was the noun in the predicate but hey I'll take it. I'm breaking down these sentence one by one.

2
User Avatar
Lia24788
Monday, Mar 30

I can see how this will help a lot for the RC section

1
User Avatar
Lia24788
Monday, Mar 30

I was close I put new development helped discover tombs.

1
User Avatar
Lia24788
Monday, Mar 30

everyone still on board ?

1
User Avatar
Lia24788
Sunday, Mar 29

@garetc88463 same , how did you get over it ?

1
User Avatar
Lia24788
Sunday, Mar 29

I took a lot time to answer but I'm glad I got 3/3 right. I'm finally understand what the questions are asking. However some answer choices I don't have no idea what they mean especially one that had phenomenon in it.

3
User Avatar
Lia24788
Sunday, Mar 29

@mhann007 no fr. what are your tips and study habit ?

2
User Avatar
Lia24788
Edited Wednesday, Mar 25

I was in between A and E and end up choosing E. I didn't understand the answer that much but i knew that that statement was supporting the premise to present the conclusion. I got it right for the blind review though.

okay so I learn that a is saying it is a sub conclusion supporting the main conclusion

while E is saying it is a premise for a sub conclusion

1
User Avatar
Lia24788
Edited Wednesday, Mar 25

I got it right but I was wrong for the premise and conclusion. I had it the other way around. What i did was find the answer that matches what the passage was saying.

1
User Avatar
Lia24788
Wednesday, Mar 25

@SavanahHoffstein Thank you for the clarification.

2
User Avatar
Lia24788
Monday, Mar 23

5/5

5
User Avatar
Lia24788
Wednesday, Mar 18

I got #2 wrong idk how I got tripped up

2
User Avatar
Lia24788
Wednesday, Mar 18

Finally 5/5 :)

1
User Avatar
Lia24788
Friday, Mar 13

@Tombee64 same

1
User Avatar
Lia24788
Thursday, Mar 12

I believe that the trash bin argument is weak because it still allows room for the reader to make claim in there own head on how it Mr. Fat is not the culprit.

In another post I thought Tiger one was pretty strong cause it got to the point but now I see that it not so strong cause the conclusion is pretty vague since there are many mammals. The premise only specify one type of mammal.

I say that Disney is strong because it leave you with no other choice but to believe. Walt only had two options if he didn't do one then he had to the other.

6
User Avatar
Lia24788
Thursday, Mar 12

Tiger: Not every plant can be eaten. After all some are poison to humans

Disney: The university is giving out back stage passes for the homecoming concert. To get a pass you either enter into the raffle or purchase a backstage pass. Terry didn't have any money to spend on backstage passes. Therefor, Terry had to enter in raffle.

Detective: Red juice was spilled all over the kitchen floor. The toddle had red juice all over her. Therefore the toddler knocked over the red juice

1
User Avatar
Lia24788
Thursday, Mar 12

I feel like the tiger argument had one strong premise while the Disney argument used multiple premises to make a claim. Also the Disney argument gave us two methods to obtain a pass and told us Walt didn't do one of the method so therefor he had to the other method to obtain the pass. It was kind of like putting the puzzle to together.

3
User Avatar
Lia24788
Edited Thursday, Mar 12

Number 6 trick me cause I thought the "But" was starting a argument

7 threw me off cause it was one sentence, but I see your allowed to break the sentence up.

5

Confirm action

Are you sure?