I keep getting the damn indonesian shrimp question!!! I got 2/4, because I refuse to count the question I memorized the answer to

I'm gonna train my kid to catch like i'm fuckin Shohei Ohtani

I don't know how, but I went from getting like 1/5 correct in the curriculum to 5/5 no BR here.

what.

i wanna cry

I'm confused why E is correct. Yeah, they talk about the similarity of fins and wings, but don't we then have to assume that birds hunt their prey over long distances? I mean I guess they do, but I don't KNOW that.

man i gotta read better

i'm gonna fling myself out the window. it's been fun guys

this question fucking sucks

i was stuck on D for so long and then I went with C, I'm mad.

I think I'm realizing that my problem is correctly identifying where the gap is. When I identify it correctly, I generally get them right, but when I don't I'm way off.

idk why I don't just

read the answers before I answer

I picked B because I'm a pompous asshole

I BR'ed A because it's the only one that makes sense lol

i'm scared

These are the curve breakers folks lol

how the hell is PT119.S2/Q15 a level 1 question lmao

Is it unreasonable to assume that avoiding frustration with a new keyboard is analogous to disliking change? That's why I picked C over E

"Dumbasses"

he's right, you know

Burglary HAS to be committed at nighttime? What does nighttime mean? Is it PM? After sunset? What if I break in at 12:01 but it's still dark out? What if I break in at dawn?

Granted I'm sure B&E will cover all of these hypotheticals but it's crazy that we have a different definition because of "nighttime" and, I assume, different sentencing guidelines

EDIT: just found out that breaking and entering and burglary are interchangeable in canada, but not the US. wild.

I don't understand the explanation of (C) where it says "But the premises don’t establish that the computer was not typically used in operation of a business" when the AC literally says "the computer that Natalie owned and used exclusively in the operation of her small business."

I think I understand why the answer is incorrect (ie the PO's action was, in fact, justified) but the explanation does a horrible job explaining this

I'm getting these and understanding why they're right, but it's such a mindfuck to not have to dig into the nitty-gritty of arguments like in WSE and to a lesser extent RRE

I have to remember that the answer choices are true. I kept reading (E) and saying "Okay but how do you KNOW it'll cause less competition?"

Doesn't matter, it's just true.

Questions like these make me feel like I'm smoking killer weed.

On first glance this question was ridiculous. Once I realized you had to bridge the gap between why ASA slows deterioration of brain functions (by limiting microglia which destroys protein BA), the answer was obvious, and surprising

I picked A, does the idea that rap is not performed idiosyncratically and conforms to the public not attack the idea that rap is individualistic and non-traditional?

EDIT: A) doesn't say challenges the conclusion, whoopsie

man this is the question type i am gonna struggle with

My prediction was that if people are honking, drivers will tend to want to be a dick right back, which led me to (E). Now I know that that only accounts for half the phenomenon, and not for those drivers waiting quietly