22 seconds damn, the low res summaries really help seperate each persons viewpoints/arguments

you sly dog... still got it right tho but had to read the question stem like 3 times bcz I was like huh

I got the question right in 1 min 24 seconds, i came here just to say how in the world can you solve this in 24 seconds, takes me longer to just look at the stimulus and read it fully

I don't understand how I got this one right so easily, but got like half of the other na questions wrong bruh

I would say yes and no, I dont do diagramming but I still watch the video to see how he breaks it down and how he rules out wrong answers. Even if you get the question right I feel like its still beneficial to watch the videos because you might learn something about ruling out wrong answers you missed, either way if not mapping the questions works for you then dont try and force the change as it'll just take up time. For me personally, im already a slow reader but Im effective at highlighting and that is enough for me to follow without mapping it. Find what works for you and stick with it, but still would recommend watching the videos, what I do is if I get a question right just put it on 1.4x speed.

Yes, but I increase the video speed to 1.4x

I got 3/5 again but on the third attempt 5/5 lets go lmfao

3/5... ill come back tom and get my revenge

Right, I feel like A was extremely obvious, once I saw that I only had to skim the other answers just to be sure, was also shocked about the difficulty.

I feel like this question is so simple and the answer choice is pretty obvious. How this is level 4 difficulty is beyond me, but hey ill take it lmao.

I think we can all agree that causation logic MBT questions are 10 times better than the conditional ones we have to diagram. I feel like these questions you can just read them and poe where as the other ones you take forever mapping it out properly

first time getting the question right and submitting before the target time, 11 seconds to spare :). Very much needed small win.

its just a glitch, it happens to me sometimes too, I found a loophole around it though. When you pause and the screen goes blank, scroll down so the video is off ur page and then scroll back up and it should show now. I dont know how but it works lol

The context says it is unlikely there is anything new to learn about what makes jazz resonate with people, the conclusion attacks that saying yet... there is a new discovered rhythm that generates a powerful sense of excitement sort of meaning, it generates a new form/ way we can see how jazz resonates with people, and then the premise gives support for that saying here is an example of it happening. The conclusion is usually the authors opinion/topic of persuasion, if the second sentence was the conclusion then there would be no argument as the next two sentences wouldn't make sense. Remember, usually the author beings in a point saying, in certain studies... some say etc.. then follow with so they conclude or it is likely that... (this is all context) what follows is the authors opinion which is usually the conclusion, and then after that the support (premises).