1/7 LETS GOOO Saw the first question and knew it was wraps

Every time I feel like im getting the hang of LR I get a dumb question like this be so for real right now

Literally on any other question if you make the assumptions you had to make here it would be wrong. Like actually what the f is this question

I swear to god Ill feel like ill finally get the hang of LR and not making unnecessary assumptions and then its like oh you idiot you had to assume this LIKE WHYYYYY

This question actually made me want to bash my head into a wall what in the world is even going on here

@LaneyWilliams This was my exact thoughts as well!

This question actually makes me want to bash my head into a wall

I separate my journal into tabs based on the week, so I have one tab for RC and one tab for LR. I review my journal at the end of each week and try to pick out 3-5 reoccurring mistakes to focus on for the upcoming week!

Ugh I swear this is the most frustrating thing EVER. I get it wrong and then immediately in BR I see the right answer and understand it perfectly UGH

yayyy I am feeling confident about this one! I wrote it out as if A or /B > C, and then the second one as B > A. Was able to see that C has a similar pattern of reasoning in the sense of A or B > C, and then B > A :)

I got confused and picked C because isn't Craig agreeing that they need to ask for directions if they are lost... so is he not accepting Rifka's premise here and rejecting her conclusion?

Ughhhhh. Switched sufficient and necessary on Q2 but got it on the blind review

IM GETTING ITTTT YESSS

I am confused about #5. The no one trips me up- when you're applying the group three indicators, don't you have to negate one of the ideas and make it the sufficient condition? I am just getting confused on if it becomes Undergoes transformation > faces trial or No transformation > trial. Do you negate the "no one"(if that makes sense?)

@hannahhuynh This is awesome, thanks for sharing!!!

This is such a great video! Drawing the bubbles has completely transformed my understanding!

Omg, breaking the sentences down into clauses and determining their relationships honestly makes this click so much for me. This was a great lesson!

3/3! Woohoo!

Yay! I feel better about this one than the first one actually LOL

@Nena_lena I think the last line! There is probably a better way to incentivize employees to work harder BECAUSE employees who are intimidated cannot concentrate on their work. If you flip it around- employees who are intimidated cannot concentrate on their work BECAUSE there is probably a better way to incentivize employees to work harder you can see that it doesn't offer support to the argument.

I am still learning and am not an expert but this has been my thought process so far, I'm open to any feedback!!!

These lessons have been so helpful so far!

5/5! i always like to go through line by line and ask "ok why" or "this is happening because of this" referencing other parts of the argument. the "why should i believe this" method has been so helpful!

Hi everyone! I'm Bryce, taking the LSAT in June!