So, is the moral of this lesson to say that if we could run a perfect experiment to back up our casual statements then they would be stronger? That seemed pretty self-explanatory.
What if because they were forced to smoke a pack of cigarettes a day they had less time or desire to exercise, and this lack of exercise caused the cancer?
im confuse dhow we are supposed to apply this knowledge to the test. like yes obviously running a test like this would reveal results that can help us with the link, but we aren't going to be doing that on the test, or seeing these numbers spewed at us on the test. someone let me know
How do we run an experiment on something we have no additional information about? #help
8
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
35 comments
So, is the moral of this lesson to say that if we could run a perfect experiment to back up our casual statements then they would be stronger? That seemed pretty self-explanatory.
what if the non-smoking group got lung cancer because of second-hand smoking. thus they got cancer from smoking anyway, kind of, no? haha
any psych majors here?? this has been the easiest part of the lessons for me lol
gonna hop on the bandwagon and also suggest this be a video :(
This really needed to be a video. What is going on here
How are RCTs directly applicable to answer LSAT qs, or is this supposed to be more of a general lesson to understand the bigger pic?
#feedback- THIS SHOULD BE A VIDEO! COME ON
What if because they were forced to smoke a pack of cigarettes a day they had less time or desire to exercise, and this lack of exercise caused the cancer?
Totally ethical.
Don't let Mr. Beast see this
If my cigarettes are paid for, SIGN ME UP
"phenomena" is plural
#feedback this should be a video
Realistically, how does this apply to the exam?
Also, it would be very beneficial to be able to highlight and edit the text itself. Please consider adding this feature.
im confuse dhow we are supposed to apply this knowledge to the test. like yes obviously running a test like this would reveal results that can help us with the link, but we aren't going to be doing that on the test, or seeing these numbers spewed at us on the test. someone let me know
soooo....the scientific method basically?
#feedback it would be awesome if we could highlight certain phrases/passages in a lesson!
that one statistics course i had to take for my political science major, thank youuuuu
As a statistics major, this is just common sense!
Having a science background is finally beneficial for me
Can anyone reexplain why it was appropriate to use 140k vs 150k?
How do we run an experiment on something we have no additional information about? #help