Someone please let me know if they do the same thing or if this helps them.

The way I'm attacking this question is to fully understand the passage and pick the answer I would use to explain the phenomenon to someone else. Like, it would make the most sense to talk about manufacturing pottery and what materials and tactics you use, because it's similar to the glass in the passage.

Does that make sense? Maybe i'm going a little crazy. Glass? Cathedrals? melting?

Someone let me know if they agree, so that I can decide if I'm on the right track or not. I feel like these types of questions are just "Well, what explanation is stronger?".

As I'm reading through the questions, I find myself saying out loud "A? Yea probably, B? yea probably. C? That makes way more sense than A and B. D? Yea probably"

Does anyone do the same thing?

#feedback I don't understand how I chose the easiest difficulty, but got questions labeled as Hard and Hardest? Not really helping with the morale

#feedback we really need more practice problems for these. these are so complicated and the video was very limited with extremely simple sentences.

why did this stress me out more than the LSAT does...

For question 3, I think I got the right idea? The wording started to trip me up a little bit, but maybe someone can provide feedback on my work here...

Maintaining maximum deterrence from aggression by other nations requires that a nation maintain a retaliatory force greater than that of any other nation.

A & B - nations that maintain a retaliatory force v. any other nation

Comparing - who will maintain maximum deterrence from aggression by other nations

Winner - the nation that maintains a retaliatory force

#feedback the subtitles are slightly off time about halfway through the video lesson.

I have never been more frustrated with the LSAT and LR than these last two sections (SA and NA). I feel like i cannot get anything right no matter how much time I spend on it and I'm losing motivation

this after SA is starting to feel personal...

i did not mean to comment this help #feedback

this made me want to pull my hair out

I keep moving too fast and incorrectly answering the passages with no conclusions....

Would there be statements like this on the exam? Statements with no conclusion?

would it be in my best interest to sit and study all the indicator words? or would that be a waste of time?