Anyone else read "posterity" as PROSPERITY and completely ignored A lol

That is why I got this question wrong, in a bunch of other similar questions it was a dealbreaker but here it is not. (even though I know now that the other answers are wrong but I was using the countrapositives to speed through the question) #help

Agreed, if this was a deep analysis question and I have 10 minutes to think about all that I'd see why the trap is fair for a medium level question...

A is about ability: it says "can learn" and not about what children should learn like the argument says

depends whether the question about Jeff, Miranda or both

#help for these kinds of questions, does it make sense to just read the sentence in passage B and answer it, got the answer right and took an extra minute or so..

just be careful it's anthropologist aka people who study anthropology not people making films

lets just all pray that the right answer is always the first answer in these questions lol

I think they added that later on prolly thanks to this guy lol

having to adjust the volume cz JY is excited about apples is the a reminder of why I stuck to this course lol

I do not understand why he had us go through all the crazy questions in a row, thought I was doomed until I got to drill on medium and harder...

I got this right but took over 3 minutes lol, anyone got advice on how to get those quicker?

literally just did the same thing

I know this is the field and what not, but these questions really stretch what logic is

Am I the only one getting hardest ones right easily and the lev 1 and 2 difficulty all wrong lol

In the beginning I used to write out the lawgic but now for questions like these I just do a small diagram. For some questions heavy on conditionals lawgic helps a lot so I do it... Think the point is doing it now so in time we won't need to write it down.

Like if you have gotten zero drills right in this section so far :)

#feedback watching a 13 min video without seeing all the answers next to each other makes understanding the question so much harder...

#help

I am confused about the first sentence grammar: I understand that most applies to commercial raspberry growers but is it that most large nurseries only sell plants that are guaranteed disease-free or is it the section that sells to commercial growers that is only selling guaranteed?

I am pretty sure he just made a mistake and he meant 2 cz he did not negate sufficient, just put it in necessary...

Took every brain cell I have to get this right.

Question difficulty: Easier.

RIP

Wouldn't the argument be invalid just because it is ←s→ and not ‑m→ in the conclusion? or is it valid if the premise was in the right order?

what is the point of feedback if the only issue is being ignored or vaguely answered? Also rhetorical.

it is not:

A←s→B is Some A is B or Some B is A

A and B is the relationship between the two

(look at number 1)

If you look at the previous lesson the argument says:

All New York City residents living in buildings with more than ten units have an inalienable right to keep a pet if that animal has been kept openly and notoriously for three months or more.

here you know that the rules to keep a pet are NYC and 10 units+ and keep it openly for 3+ months.

Now compare it to this one:

Percy lives with his poodle in a New York City residential building with more than ten units. Therefore, if Percy has openly and notoriously kept his poodle for three months or more, then his landlord cannot force him to get rid of it.

If you look at this, it does not say that it is a rule that you need to openly for 3+ months keep the poodle, it just concludes without stating it as a rule, which makes the argument invalid.

this is what I understood, hope it helps!