Pure sequencing game. Rule was something like W is before S OR S if before T BUT NOT BOTH... I was drawing a blank for a while. Doesn't that mean, in a nutshell, S will never be b/w W & T either before both or after both? Also, how do you draw that into your grand scheme efficiently? This game should have taken 6m, but drained 12 due to me not handling those 2 "or/not both" rules well.

First sentence I diagrammed as: wind & below 84-> pleasant. The second part of this question I diagrammed as : above 84 or no wind ->oppressive. I incorrectly got answer choice (B) it has something to do the the humidity but I was able to add it to my diagramming. Help please.

I do not understand the difference between answer choice C and D. How do you suggest that I decipher between two choices that are so close. I tried to incorporate them into the passage and incorrectly thought that D was a winner.

This question is very difficult because I just cannnot understand the stimulus. Could I please get an explanation of this question stem and answer choices?

is there a difference between the old lsat preptests and the new preptests. I took my lsat in february (did quite good) and i mainly studied from preptests 1-38. i'm just curious as to what difference there is for the newer lsat 39-60. is there a difference in the logical reasoning?

Hi, I come across this problem in argument part questions: is a hypothesis the same thing as a statement?

I usually eliminate the wrong answer choices by matching them up to the stimulus (Ex. I eliminate the answer choice starts with "it is a premise " because I id'ed the statement as a conclusion). But some argument part questions describes statements differently (A) "This is a statement" or B) "this is a hypothesis for which the author supports." Should we eliminate answer choices that call it a hypothesis when it is a statement? Is there even a difference.

Ex: Is a "Fetuses develop fingernails in the third week of development" a statement?

Is " Scientists say fetuses develop fingernails in the third week" a hypothesis?

Hi Alan,

I noticed that for every PT, you have to fill out the answer sheet no matter what in order to get to the explanation video.

I've already taken a few PT's before the LSAT score sheet was implemented and for some of those PT's I don't have my answer anymore (all i have is my PT with writing and scibbles on it which I just use to refer too). I've used my own spreadsheet prior to the implemented lsat score sheet.

If possible, would it be possible for video explanations to have its own little dropbox with a heading like "Video Explanation for Preptest X" in each PT webpage that you can open and close like in the "Progress" page for each PT without having to resort to filling out the answer sheet? (e.g., if you click the title of a group of question types like "Method of Reasoning", it collapses the lessons and uncollapse them clicked on the title again".

What i've been doing when reviewing older PT's that I took awhile ago, I would bubble in one random answer choice, then click "Score" and then scroll and look for the question that I would need a video explanation for.

I've noticed that in some LR questions, there would be sentences that start off like "Even though","although". These sentences are qualifying the the argument a bit more correct? I remember in one particular video something about this, I think it was acknowledging something so as to prevent the reader from using it against the argument or something like that...

What are your opinions on this?

Hello there. Question on point of issue questions - which is better? doing the list method or reading through and determining the disagreement/agreement?

Fumbling between methods made me lose time on my recent PTs. I either start list method and then find the POI is easy to see and lose time or try reading and have to do list method because POI is not too clear cut.

Advice appreciated. Thanks 7sagers!

Hey Juners, if you have questions or comments relating to the June LSAT, please post them here!

Hey study buddies, post your thoughts about your meetings here! Suggestions welcome!

Here's the general idea guys. You're all studying for this horrendously difficult test. Better to do it with someone else than alone. How? Blind Review your LSAT Prep Tests or Problem Sets with someone else (in person or over Google Hangouts). Try to find someone 1) on your schedule and 2) at your level.

Edit: We now have a Study Buddies app on the dashboard! Check it out here:

http://classic.7sage.com/dashboard/

Ask anything you like :)

I took the LSAT earlier this year and scored in the low-170s. Concerned about the September LSAT due to how I felt on the test and a variety of personal factors. Should I purchase score preview so I can cancel?

7Sage:

Some recent additions to 7Sage are great, like the games and AI. But I would love to know why you felt the need to change the interface. The previous interface was a lot more straight forward. Now I spend several minutes trying to figure out which combination of the following buttons I need to have to cross out an answer or highlight it yellow. This was not necessary. Please don't change things just for the sake of changing things.

I honestly wouldn't recommend this course, I began with an 145, I am about to take a prep test and I know for a fact that the instructors have confused me more than help me, just tell me why and which answer is correct not make me think why the other answers might be correct is annoying, I hightly regret taking this course

I'm still kinda on the sidelines about the enitre "going to law school" thing, and I just took my first full PrepTest with no practice/knowledge about the LSAT. I got a score of 163, and I was wondering if it would be worth for me to spend my time and energy on studying for the LSAT... I don't really want to take the exam multiple times, and I would preferably take the June 2026 exam.

Would it be unreasonable for me to shoot for a mid-170s for the June 2026 exam based on what I have right now?

I know that 176 is a great score, however before the test in June I had got 3/4 180s on PTs. I am a splitter for the T-14s (3.6 gpa, math major). I graduated back in 2021, so I think I count as non-traditional. I looked on the admissions predictor and a 180 vs a 176 could raise my chances by 10-20% at top schools. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.

Hello, I just finished the lsat with a 168 score and If anyone is looking for a personalized study plan to reach the best score they can PM me. I will provide the the exact formula that made me go from 149-168 since January and improvement is guaranteed. Perfect for those stuck taking test in coming months and don't have time to go through entire curriculum. NO BS, NO REPEATING, GUARANTEED IMPROVEMENT.

About me...

I went through most of college not knowing I had ADHD, so I spent years thinking I just wasn't trying hard enough when really I just learned differently than how my schools taught. This helped me realize that most people don't need to work harder — they need to figure out what's actually holding them back. This is the core of how I coach: no one-size-fits-all prep, everything tailored to how you specifically think through problems.

By figuring out my own way to learn the LSAT I went from a 151 to a 177. The increase wasn't talent or one breakthrough — it was months of grinding until I finally learned how to learn the LSAT. Once I figured that out, progress came fast and studying actually became fun. That process, and the three years and 1,000+ hours of coaching since, taught me what it takes to improve and how to help people get there faster than I did.

What I do:

• Review your 7Sage analytics before every session so I already know where your biggest point gains are

• Build custom drill sets for your specific weaknesses with difficulty levels, set sizes, and clear benchmarks

• Send a detailed study plan after every session with everything you need for the week

• Teach you how to diagnose your own mistakes so the hours you study on your own are actually effective

• Work through problems with you live to catch the mental habits that are actually costing you points

Good fit for students who:

• Feel like their score doesn't reflect the work they're putting in

• Understand explanations after the fact but keep making similar mistakes

• Want real structure in their study plan, not just "do more practice tests"

• Want help structuring not just what to study, but how — session length, timing, and building a consistent daily routine

Here's what that looks like in practice:

One of my students had been stuck in the mid 150s. Turns out she was 0 for 6 on one specific question pattern and solid on everything else. Two weeks of targeted work and her next practice test was a 167.

Another student came to me after scoring a 165 on the actual LSAT. The habit that got her there — dialing in on small details — had started working against her. She was overcomplicating questions when the right move was to step back. We figured out when to use that mode and when to switch gears. Six weeks later she scored a 175.

Pricing:

• Free consultation call (20–30 minutes) so I can learn where you're at

• First diagnostic session: $150 flat

• Ongoing sessions: $250/hour — sessions run 90 minutes ($375)

• 100% refund guarantee. Finding the right coach matters, and I want you to see how I work before you commit. If after your diagnostic session it's not the right fit, I'll refund you the full amount. No questions asked.

• No packages, no commitments — week by week

Getting started:

I currently have 5 slots available right now. We start with a free consultation call (about 20–30 minutes) so I can learn where you're at and make sure it's the right fit before we begin. I'll respond the fastest if you text or email, but I'll also respond to DMs — it may just take a bit longer.

• Text: 801-645-3233

• Email: tanner.call@law.byu.edu

I just started studying for the LSAT, and will take it in September. My diagnostic test was a 173, and my second prep test was 168. What's the best way for me to improve my score and my consistency? Does it make sense to go through the entire 7Sage curriculum, or should I skip the basics and just focus on my areas of weakness?

If I want to go to say, session 18 or 20 after I logged out, is there a way where I can go straight to 18 the next time, or do I just need to start with 1 and click next 17 more times to get to where I left off? Just wondering if there is a quicker way each time I log out.

Matt

Is the test on the tablet issued in landscape style or portrait style? I want to practice it the way it comes up on the tablets at the testing site on my ..laptop (tablet style).

Is anyone interested in checking out my personal statement and giving some critiques/advice? It is still in fairly roughish form, but I'm having internal conflict about what to change/improve/take out etc.

Can anyone please direct me to the link for LR videos on 7Sage? It would be greatly appreciated. THANKS!

Hi all, I'm going through the CC now and am about halfway through. I was wondering if it would help/ hinder to start taking maybe 1 PT per week (Even though it would take longer to complete the rest of the CC). Although I'm learning a lot from the CC I'm nervous that as weeks pass I'll be forgetting earlier things I've learned. Has anyone tried this and would recommend? Thanks!