If you have concerns regarding the new UI, please submit feedback to LSAC https://www.lsac.org/send-us-your-feedback. It doesn't take long, and if enough people speak up, maybe they will listen. Here is an example of a complaint with regard to the new answer-choice elimination feature and highlighter functionality. If you have similar concerns, feel free to use this as a template:

Dear LSAC,

I am writing to express my concerns regarding the new user interface introduced for the August 2026 LSAT and beyond. Specifically, I am concerned about the changes made to the answer-choice elimination feature and the highlighting functionality.

The updated answer-choice elimination feature now requires test takers to toggle the masking/strike-through tool before they can eliminate an answer choice. This adds unnecessary steps to a task that was previously completed with a single click, increasing the time and attention required for an action that many test takers perform repeatedly throughout the exam.

Similarly, the new highlighting feature is significantly less efficient than the previous version. Rather than automatically highlighting selected text, it now requires interaction with a pop-up menu before the highlight is applied. While this may seem like a minor change in isolation, the cumulative effect over the course of a timed exam is meaningful. Test takers frequently rely on highlighting and answer elimination as integral parts of their testing strategy, and introducing additional clicks and interruptions creates unnecessary friction during an already highly time-constrained assessment.

Beyond the immediate impact on efficiency, these interface changes also disadvantage individuals who have spent months preparing with the previous testing platform. Many students have developed habits and workflows around the prior interface, and changing core functionality shortly before or during an active testing cycle forces them to devote additional time to adapting to the platform rather than focusing on the skills the LSAT is intended to measure.

I respectfully request that LSAC reconsider these interface changes and, if possible, restore the previous single-click answer elimination feature and the automatic highlighting functionality. At a minimum, I encourage LSAC to evaluate whether these modifications meaningfully improve the testing experience or instead introduce unnecessary obstacles that do not enhance the exam's purpose or fairness.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I appreciate your willingness to consider feedback from test takers and hope these concerns will be taken into account in future updates.

Has the highlighting feature completely disappeared for anyone else in PTs? (I know they updated the feature but I don't even see the tool when I highlight the words I want to highlight)

I don't see it anymore in both LR and RC questions.

i have to complain just once and then i will move on and submit to the change but I CANNOT STAND THE NEW HIGHLIGHTING FEATURE

i know i know it is LSAC. but like bruh. i see no reason to change it but for the reason to make it take longer to highlight. which actually does not make ANY logical sense to me.

SO much of law school involves highlighting- also to change orange to green is criminal

it's not that big of a deal but enough to bother me less than a month out from test day.

my biggest peeve with it is that it doesn't just stay the color you choose- it resets every question (at least from my brief usage with the new feature)

WHATEVER.

gotta accept it and overcome the change

I took my cold diagnostic in the middle of June and scored a 151, I’ve been studying consistently for 3 weeks and got a 164 on yesterday’s test! Aiming for a 170 on the September test, I think I can do it!

Hi everyone! I'm hitting a wall on LR. For some reason I keep missing questions in the 15-20 range of the section, usually getting 3-4 wrong in a row during that stretch. There isn't necessarily a pattern in the type of question im getting wrong just their placement in the test. The frustrating part is that on blind review, I get them all right. Anyone have tips for pushing through this kind of patch?

I started properly using BR (not just guessing and oh I guess I'll just choose the other option), but properly understanding why my option is what. And stopping all my second-guessing esp. when I have a gut feeling and time is there. Then did a full RC section timed and each question made sure I either uunderstood or for a trickier passage got the gist of it and was able to do it. AND FINALLY WENT FRMO -6 IN RC TO A -0 FOR THE FIRST TIME MY FIRST -0 IN ANY SECTION. finally I feel the work paying offffff

Why is the highlighter gone when doing an adaptive drill??

Can a therapist fill out the qualified professional form? I’m trying to get accommodations for ADHD but my psychiatrist is unable to fill it out. would my therapist be able to fill it out?

I know they were changing the highlighting feature for LR but not seeing any highlighting feature at all in my RC drills

I probably already know the answer here, but looking for more insight. I'm planning to take the Sept LSAT and even though my BR is exactly where I want, I'm still struggling getting that on an actual timed section or PT. I wanted to apply as soon as possible, so planned to by early Oct as soon as I had my score.

But how much does applying early in the cycle actually give you a boost? Obviously it's better to have your best LSAT score possible, but if that takes me until even December, January etc to apply - how will that impact admissions outcomes?

On Lawhub the questions and stimuli/passages are centered on your computer screen.

I think my biggest hurdle is, specifically with LR, that I always miss an important piece of the Stimuli or Question Stem that ultimately makes my answers wrong. Specifically on timed sections, when I do a blind review and reread the question, I almost immediately see the mistake I made and am able to correct my answers.

I keep telling myself I'm going to "read more carefully" but does anyone have any active steps I could do? Highlighting the premise and conclusions, pausing, or something that I can practice or if im under a time crunch I might be able to implement.

Best,

Garrett

I use the highlighter tool for both LR and RC, so the new update is very time consuming and honestly distracting and I feel like it ruins my flow / efficiency, especially since I already struggle with timing and concentration due to ADHD.

I typically highlight only keywords to simplify each stimulus by reducing wordiness and exclude irrelevant info, and different colours really help to differentiate arguments vs support statements or conditions, for example.

Now that highlighting every other word takes 3x longer, I dont really have enough time, and it just complicates my ability to solve questions as I'm used to. What should I do to adapt, given that I'm registered for August.

Entertain this hypothetical for me.

You are scheduled to take the LSAT in exactly 3 months. Assume you, at your current practice score and place in your lesson/practice plan, have 90 days to study full time. You aren't made of money, but you have enough to cover your expenses and get access to a reasonable amount of resources (for example, you can't afford to hire a personal tutor to coach you every day but you can subscribe to the 7sage Live program). 90 days to lock in and become an expert in the LSAT.

What would this look like for you? What kind of advice would you give to someone who has this opportunity? How would you structure your study plan? How often would you take a practice test? How would you adapt your study plan as you go to adjust for new problems/progress? Regardless, I'd like to hear what this would look like for you, not me. I want to gain some more perspective.

Me personally? I've taken 4 practice tests before subscribing to 7sage two days ago. My scores in order are 155, 161, 156, 165. My studying for the past few months has been on the back burner. I don't feel the need to complete lessons, but I can be convinced otherwise. I feel like when I read The Loophole and did lessons my score suffered in the short term from 'reinventing the wheel,' so to speak.

My priority is locking my time management down, especially on RC. I'd probably spend 6 hours practicing per day, 3 hours of drilling and 3 hours of untimed practice + review alteration, followed by two hours of wrong answer journaling, blind review, and reviewing and taking notes for certain question types I struggled with that day. Or maybe switch those up, do blind review for the day before and follow it up with practice. I think I'd alternate RC and LR daily, but I don't have a reason it just feels right.

Before you ask I was laid off yesterday. Please don't pity me because I hated that job and I didn't need it.

I know the new UI was built in response to how LSAC has changed their settings, but with the new scroll feature on a lot of the reading comp paragraphs, my computer keeps bouncing me back up to the top of my readings whenever I reach the bottom, it is very frustrating trying to fight my computer while in a timed setting, is there a way to fix to this, or is this another hurdle I have to get through?

Noticed I have been getting Author’s Perspective-Implied questions wrong the most . Any tips on how to get better at these RC Qs?

On a PT has anyone routinely done their first LR section then gone backwards (start with the last question) if the next section is LR? My thinking is that you are already in that 'curve breaker' mode so you just maintain it rather than going back to easier questions, then ramping up again. I have a bad habit of not letting go of a question then rushing the clock at the end. So if I were to do this (yes, I should correct the issue of letting go) I would be rushing easier questions with maybe a higher probability of getting them right?

Is there not an option to underline anymore?

Hi! I will be taking the August LSAT in a few weeks. It is the first LSAT I will take. I took my first Practice Test today and received a timed score of 149; however, on my BR I received a 169. Has anyone else had this situation? If so, what tips do you have for bridging this gap?

Hi everyone,

I wanted to send this out into the void in case others are in a similar boat. A consistent issue (?) I've been having is making the occasional, but still annoyingly frequent, silly mistake. Most often, I've identified my mistake is not "zooming out" on an easy question and seeing that the answer is so incredibly obvious, and instead getting lost in the sauce of critical thinking. Also, I'll occasionally identify the wrong conclusion in a stimulus and then realize during review that I was incorrect, but it was just a goof rather than fundamental misunderstanding.

I'm a high scorer and would like to focus my energy on the handful of questions I find actually hard, rather than keep getting disappointed by my silly mistakes/overthinking. Does anyone have any tips or drill recs to help me from overthinking questions and getting them wrong?

Thanks!

Well, due to an extra boring stint of time at work pre holiday and a rainy Fourth of July weekend I managed to run myself out of my usage limit on the AI. I know there are differences in the plans for AI usage limits. The thing is there is no descriptive qualities to these limits. Will I go from Live to coach and only get to have three more question sets from it? There is also no other appeal to the coach plan for me being I don't have the time or inclination to meet with real coaches over zoom anyways (I assume other people are in the same boat). Purchasable AI time along with the students overall realization that the AI is quite adept at writing questions that they haven't seen before seems like a very profitable area to expand into. I know I would purchase them as I have spoken with the AI until it has gamified writing new questions and prompts for me daily then breaks down where my reasoning for every answer is correct or incorrect. I don't know if this will be something that you guys decide to do but it would be nice and it would probably be a needed advent to described how the ai timing is being purchased (text amount, message amount, other) and how much you really get with each plan to make it obvious as the whether it is a worthwhile upgrade. Hope this at least brings up some conversation about it.

hi guys! i took the june lsat and was satisfied with my score, but i literally want 2 points higher, as that can make or break some admissions, and it's just not happening. obviously my blind review can be 4 points higher after a pt, so i have understanding, but i still am stuck.

any insightful tips, whether serious or just a quick life hack that worked, that will help me out? i want to be done! i've only gotten that target score once in april on a pt.