I just scored a 164 on PT126.

just wanted to share that this was my first time breaking into the 160s, but i'm still not feeling good because I got so many wrong on the experimental. Any advice?

Hi, I am looking for advice for how to get into the high 160s and lower 170s by November test. My last PTs are averaging 164 with LR averaging -4 and RC averaging -6. I do full PT BRs and WAJs and have read the loophole. Looking for any advice! Thanks!

I have been studying for a few months and now average 169 - 170 in my prep tests. A few weeks ago I sat down and did a usual prep test but got a 178, which was my highest score yet.

However, the 2 prep test after that amazing score were both 167, which was subpar for my admission goals. This high and low kinda shattered my confidence, but I got a 169 on my prep test yesterday. It’s a good score, but still not sufficient.

I am at a point where I know I have the skill to do well, but its my mentality that is put to the test every time. I am sure I will face harder challenges than this is Law School, so this is good preparation.

Im taking the LSAT in October and hope I can produce a consistent and high enough score. Have anyone else experimented something like this? And how did you improve after it?

Thank you!

Phoenix Yuan

This is my second post regarding this issue, because I really need some help here. I am studying between 4 and 8 hours everyday, and I can't seem to get above a 160. This is odd for me, as in July I was scoring up to 169s. Every practice section I do, I get between 4 and 5 questions wrong, without fail. I don't know what else to do beyond drilling and reviewing my incorrect answers. Please send help and specific tips! I take the LSAT again in less than two weeks and I cannot afford to get below a 165, and I feel like incredibly lost as to what more I can do.

how do i cancel the subscription and get my money back?

Hi Everyone!

I am currently going through the comprehensive study plan and have been watching both the videos and reading the written lessons for each lesson. Is it worth doing both? Or, am I missing something if I only read the description and don't watch the lesson as well?

Hi everyone! I am looking to get a study group going for anyone in the Midwest. Looking at an April 2026 LSAT test date. I am going through the LSAT Trainer, the Loophole, PowerScore Reading Comprehension, and obviously 7Sage.

If you don't want a study group, but alternatively just want someone to just connect with and share some encouragement, I am down for that too!

Listen and subscribe:

Apple Podcasts | Spotify

Ever wonder which LSAT questions are really the toughest? In this episode, we dig into the data behind the hardest LSAT questions—breaking down the overall proportions of different question types and then zooming in on how those proportions shift within the notorious Harder and Hardest difficulty levels. You’ll get a clearer picture of which question types dominate the hardest tiers, how that compares to the test overall, and what that means for your study strategy.

title

Through some unexpected set backs I had to push taking the LSAT from September to November. I’m super stressed abt getting in & scholarships. Anyone know about how applications are reviewed that late? A lot of the schools I’m applying would still consider it an early application, so it does make me feel kinda better but not sure how worried I should be.

I initially started studying for the LSAT on "LSAT Demon", mostly taking practice tests, in June. I was averaging out at about a 165, but my highest test score was a 169 right before I took the actual LSAT in August. On that test, I scored a 163. I was devastated. It completed knocked the wind out of my sails and I didn't study for all the rest of August and most of September.

I just started studying here on "7Sage" last week, as I am scheduled to take the October LSAT. On my first day of "7Sage", I took a practice test and scored a 161. When I initially studied for the LSAT, I was doing around one practice test a week, with very little other studying. Now, here on "7Sage", I've been doing around 6 hours of studying a day, mimimum, and it seems like I keep doing worse and worse. I always get at least 5 questions wrong in each section, and my drilling accuracy is 80%. Why am I getting worse? How do I fix this most efficiently? Because I am willing to do all the work necessary, but I also don't want to burn out, and it seems like "more studying" just isn't working, even though I always review every answer I get wrong.

After a period of learning LSAT, I recognize that I can do better in LEVEL4 or 5 questions. While to level 1-2-3 questions in a section, I will lose some points for some stupid reasons.

This is especially common in LR sections.

I wish there were an option for users to turn the BR recommendation on or off. Personally, I always do BR after a drill, but the recommendation often makes me second-guess my answer. It feels like a subtle hint that I got it wrong and need to find the “correct” answer, which I don’t find helpful

Predicting your score helps you sharpen your self-assessment and see patterns in under- and over-confidence—critical for improving your time management and skipping decisions on test day.

This feature is available for Drills and Sections as well.

Analytics will now automatically consider your performance in Drills and Sections in addition to PrepTests.

If you want to exclude Drills or Sections from Analytics, you can toggle it off in your settings.

I have been studying for the LSAT for about a year or so, on and off depending on whatever is going on in my life. I have taken the test and my highest score is a 164. I am trying to aim for a higher score so I can take a shot at a T-14 school (like Northwestern) with a GPA of 3.58. I took a practice test last week but it seems like I capped out at 164. I am wondering what I am doing wrong. I have been blind reviewing, but it seems like I cannot figure out for the life of me how to avoid the same mistakes I have made. Does anyone have advice?

The Reccomended for BR feature has me feeling conflicted as someone who just switched from classic to new. The fact that it picks out questions you're incorrect on makes me wonder if its impeding my own ability to see what questions I'm likely to be wrong at. It also flags questions for BR that aren't incorrect, but makes me psychologically think they are, so I end up changing them.

What's your experience been? Have you found it helpful in understanding what you're wrong at, focusing your attention on weak areas, and being more confident? Or the opposite, is it stopping you from learning?

I know it's a long shot but I'm looking for people to study with in Berlin. Also totally open to virtual friends as well :)

Hi, Im from the Vancouver, BC area and I am looking for study buddies! Let me know if you are interested. I can definitely use a group of people to study with and bounce off of. Hitting a plateau

Hi, I am taking the November LSAT and am PTing around the 150's right now. I want to get to the 160's before November and was wondering if anyone had any tips on how to get there. Thank you in advance!

Hi all, it's me again! Just wanted to share this Discord again for anyone that is interested in finding active LSAT Discords/online groups.

We got a lot of people studying for this cycle and next year (but also just starting 7Sage curriculum), so if you are in search of an active group, study buddies, or just have questions about the LSAT, please feel free to join. 💙☺️

• all LSAT learners welcome!

• all LSAT scores welcomed!

• Anyone can create/lead an LSAT study session whenever. Yes, this is a free and open online space to study.

So far I am grateful for all the support people give to one another on here, and want to share it again in the hopes that more people can benefit from it.

https://discord.gg/Hb9s8XASad Let me know if the link isn't working (🥲 last time it expired or something)

Thank you!

----

I may not always be online, but I'm happy to meet new people when I do host sessions :)

• I keep folks updated about the exam dates/deadlines

• Updates on 7Sage features and events

Moralist: Closing this factory would destroy 500 jobs and devastate families. We therefore should keep the factory open.

Environmentalist: Ridiculous. Merely pointing out negative consequences of the proposed factory shutdown does not prove we must keep the factory open. You’re overlooking potential benefits! This shows we should proceed with the factory shutdown.

Moralist: Pure nonsense. Obviously I know that I should have considered potential benefits and established why the costs of the factory shutdown would outweigh those benefits. But the fact that my argument was inadequate to prove my conclusion does not show that my conclusion was wrong! So your own response is flawed when you conclude that we should close the factory. Given your fallacious response, it’s clear that we should keep the factory open.

Environmentalist: Foolish hogwash. You’re the one committing the “fallacy fallacy”! Even if my own response was flawed, that doesn’t prove that we should keep the factory open. You can’t just reject my conclusion because my argument for closing the factory was a weak and unpersuasive criticism of your own argument for keeping it open. This is why the right course of action is to shut down the factory.

Moralist: Utter codswallop. Yes, perhaps I committed the “fallacy fallacy,” but the conclusion of my fallacious argument could still be true! What reason have you given for proceeding with the shutdown? None. All you’ve done is criticized my own argument against the shutdown. Hence, we should keep the factory open.

Concerned citizen: Please, just stop! Don’t you hear yourselves? You’re both committing the same fallacy over and over. Moralist, if you want to argue in favor of keeping the factory open based on the costs of a shutdown, you should show that you’ve considered potential benefits and that they either don’t exist or are outweighed by the costs. And Environmentalist, if you want to argue that we should proceed with the shutdown, you should tell us about the benefits of the shutdown and why they outweigh the costs. Tearing down each other’s arguments doesn’t build up your own. That’s why you’re both wrong. We should neither close nor keep the factory open.

Moralist and Environmentalist: Absurd drivel. Pointing out that our arguments were flawed doesn’t prove that our conclusions were false. That’s why, contrary to your absolute bilge-water conclusion, we should both close the factory and keep it open.

I was listening to an older 7sage LSAT podcast from before this new website was launched and they were talking about changing the settings on the analytics page to show more updated stats from the last 3 PTs taken. Is there a way to do this on the new website? I'm not sure if I'm missing it, but it would be super helpful to track recent progress. Thanks!

Hi!

I am drilling by my hardest question types and doing very well with level 1-3 questions but i am having trouble with the 4/5 level questions. On some questions i am completely confused and have NO idea what i am even supposed to do and then some of them i understand but feel like i am occasionally overlooking the right answers because it looks too simple. i get that they are meant to be harder but i am struggling so much with them. if anyone has any advice is would be much appreciated!!