... "experimental" 5th sections when taking full PTs. I also use them ... few sets of each question type are provided in the 7Sage ... needed older tests broken down bytype -- I just use them in ...
... improvements in that area by doing the fool proof logic games method ... cambridge packets that organize LG bytype... what i did was i ... went through each different type, doing anywhere from 2-5 ... games of that specific type, referring to the 7sage explanations ...
... .cambridgelsat.com/bundles/logical-reasoning-by-type/
LG: http://www. ... cambridgelsat.com/bundles/logic-games-by-type/
RC: http://www. ... These packets are conveniently organized by question type from PT 1-38 ... to be 75) as your full PT's as you near ...
@guitarnara To put it bluntly, they do not compare. You need full PT's to take under simulated exam conditions. Questions grouped bytype are only useful for drilling. They are utterly useless for the indispensable purpose of taking full-length PT's.
... do with BR?
(Answer by @Pacifico)
A: Drilling is ... issues you have rather than full PTs. You should BR when ... random or all the same type. Early in your prep it ... have LR/LG/RC categorized bytype?
A: Yep! Check out ...
... this point just do the full sections from each PT if ... . I think figuring out what type of game each game is ... drilling and practice so drilling bytype kind of cheats at that ...
... 7sage. No one is harmed by double covering their bases or ... of LSAT questions bytype for 1 -- 38 and full-form tests from ... -38 tests as needed/assigned by 7sage and then PT from ...
... already own, do those as full timed PTs. Mix it up ... of questions/passages for a full section. This won't totally ... better than drilling the bundles bytype or difficulty.
Another option ...
@stepharizona as ... />
I have been doing the fullproof method for awhile now and ... learning from them. Also working full-time I feel limited because ...
... 1-35 and organizing them bytype yourself to make your own ... imo. There are also drill bytype books that you can find ... more sense to buy the full PTs so you have the ... + questions that you can organize bytype and difficulty.
... July onwards I started studying full time with the curriculum. by type from 1-38 and drill ... completely mastered a question type or game type. I strongly believe in ...
... hopes that I understand what **type** of game I am facing ... , I originally was doing them bytype from the old Cambridge Packets ... 1-35 straight-up fool proof method style and do them ...
... else on the LSAT, learning bytype is most effective. However, once ... you get as much by doing questions bytype. I think what you ... right and would do them by PT using the fool proof method.
... the "Powerscore Logic Games: Game Type Training (Volume 1)". I don ... teaches you to train games by specific type instead of getting a ... to do that also separated bytype. Not a good experience my ... where I started to Fool Proof every game. Since I already ...
... the "Powerscore Logic Games: Game Type Training (Volume 1)". I don ... teaches you to train games by specific type instead of getting a ... to do that also separated bytype. Not a good experience my ... where I started to Fool Proof every game. Since I already ...
by doing games bytype was that I ... LG Cambridge packets (Sorted bytype/difficulty) I would have ... 'll see on a full-timed section. It is ... go -0/ yet on full sections would go like - ...
... :
> LG has been by far my worst section, and ... 'm wondering if I'm full-proofing correctly? I was following ... a timed section, and then full-proof for the next few days ...
I agree with Alex, I think you should continue fool proofing while adding in timed sections of both LR and RC. Doing the full timed sections helps to bridge the gap between regular by-type drilling and taking full PTs.
... 1-35 before you begin full timed PTs. If you're ... LG and work on those type of questions? if so, what ... instead you search logic games bytype and sort them?