... believe this is considered a "reversesplitter" applicant. I wanted to know ... that look more favorably upon reverse splitters. Thanks so much for ...
... high LSAT/low GPA and reverse splitters are high GPA/low ... why most schools are more splitterfriendly than reversesplitterfriendly. Reverse splitters really need to ... doing well. In my opinion reverse splitters shouldn't even exist ...
... prevalence of splitterfriendly schools versus the dearth of reversesplitterfriendly schools tells ... this is true even for reversesplitterfriendly schools like Berkeley). Get over ... get accepted quickly. Splitters, reverse splitters, and people in between ...
Also when you look at the graphs on LSN the reversesplitterfriendly schools will have a broader horizontal distribution while the splitterfriendly schools (like NU) will be much more vertical in their distribution.
... —NU is quite reverse-splitterfriendly as a complement to being splitter-friendly; they need ... —NU is quite reverse-splitterfriendly as a complement to being splitter-friendly; they need ...
... —NU is quite reverse-splitterfriendly as a complement to being splitter-friendly; they need ... —NU is quite reverse-splitterfriendly as a complement to being splitter-friendly; they need ...
... while Penn is significantly more splitterfriendly (esp for ED as you ... class medians with splitters and reverse splitters whereas Chicago seems to ...
I am in a bit of a quandary: I had a ugrad gpa of 3.84 from a top 30 undergrad (graduated with many national honors), currently am working full time and doing my MEd in ed policy and leadership (grad gpa 3.9), on the board of a local ...
I'm taking the LSAT on Saturday. My practice tests have been about 158 so I will be content to be within a point or 2 of that given how anxiety provoking this whole test has been. My UGPA is a 3.94, and I will have completed my masters in forensic psych by ...
I took the LSAT three times already with a 162 high score and a 159 average. I don’t know what happened with my last LSAT; I was practice testing in the mid-160s. But anyway, there’s nothing I can do about that ...
Just wanted some thoughts on my situation. My last 10 PT's were averaging 168.5, and I made a 166. I'm definitely disappointed but test day penalty is definitely real.
My lsac gpa (if I calculated correctly) is much higher than the 75th percentile of most top schools, but I've been PTing in the high 160s/low 170s. I'm taking the exam in October and planning on applying in November. Right now, my top schools are Columbia ...