I only got this right because the lesson before this introduced the concept and I expected the question to reflect the lesson.

How was I suppose to know that was the conclusion #help

can someone please break down how he negates AC c? I'm having a hard time understanding how it works

@Nickgigs also, how does this question demonstrate the "sets" pattern in NA questions?

i get how e is right but i dont get how d is wrong. AC d strengthens the argument, but how is it not necessary?

@ArianNoori no :(

@Nush what

Im gonna fail the LSAT bc of PSA, SA, and NA questions

#help when doing NA questions is there a sufficient condition & necessary condition in the argument? Or is the argument providing a sufficient condition and the answer is the necessary condition that we have to assume for the conclusion to follow logically?

somebody please. what the fuck is the sufficient/necessary condition in the argument. i am so confused.

i dont even know how or why b is right but i chose it idk. not feeling good my fellow companions

@Nickgigs like what would the negated version of e be. i am so lost i feel so defeated ugh ew

somebody, please, for the love of god explain the difference between b and e for me. i understand E is the sufficient-necessary confusion thingy BUT I DO NOT GET HOW AT ALL PLZ HELP ME

i got this right but i do not understand which premise is the necessary condition. Is it necessary to display harmony to mimic nature, or is it necessary to mimic nature to display harmony?? #help #feedback... I absolutely despise necessary/sufficient condition questions :(

i got tripped up on the 'natural causes' phrasing in AC B. Can someone plzzzz explain #help

hey so this makes no sense and it makes me want to die

i hate PSA and SA i dont understand those questions at allllllll

i definitely need to go back to the grammar section (I only completed 50%) because this section has me F'd up. I have no idea the difference between prescriptive v descriptive anything, idk what he means when he says kicking it up into the premise set. This is so frustrating ughhh

yeah so this makes absolutely no sense at all

I plan on taking it, I need to register tho 😬

i do not understand this one.... at all. The written description says that (D) is a variant of the first bridge, being "if traditional classroom education cannot develop students' insights, then it is ineffective." but (D) says "Education is not effective unless it leads to the development of insight." Can someone explain how these are variants? If they were variants wouldnt (D) say something like "Education is effective if it can develop students insights?" #plzzz #help

i got this one right, but am so lost on the explanation and his does not really help, ughhhhhh

Yeahhhhhh no. I'm frustrated with this one cause the difficulty level is so small, but I chose C and cannot wrap my head around why it is incorrect. I understand how D weakens the reasoning but how does C not??

@sheadongraham this cured my confusion

I am genuinely so confused on how to know which side of the arrow the conditions go on. Full transparency I skipped much of the "foundations" curriculum but I had to come back to this part because I am so stuck when dealing with the logical reasoning questions. Please #help