@RunForrestRun thank God this trend died, I cringed so hard reading this

If Jane's whole family dies on a sunny day she'll be unbothered. Good for her I guess.

@Slippin-Jimmy I hate these questions theyre so time consuming

This is the exact reason why Lebron is better than MJ

Wait but the conclusion didn't say that a fatal catastrophe is unlikely, its said that a fatal catastrophe is unlikely at any given stage, which is well supported.

@mutayeb I agree with revoking a degree if someone was found to have cheated to get the degree (in this example he was found to have not cheated to get his degree and yet his degree was still revoked), but whatever happens after you've gotten your degree shouldn't effect your degree. A degree obviously isn't something you just buy, you do have to go through the schooling to get it ofc, but it is an asset that was purchased for a large sum. Essentially a degree is a piece of paper that says "i went through this course and learned these things and have gotten this experience", and nothing that you do after you've received the degree changes the fact that you have paid the money to go through the schooling and have gone through the coursework. I obviously understand liscences being taken away, if a lawyer does something criminal he should be disbarred but his law degree shouldn't be taken away. An institution allowing you to pay them ridiculous amounts of money to go there isn't a "priviledge", a school isn't doing you a favor by letting you go to their school, they're a business that is giving you a degree in exchange for time and money and they should not have the right to take away that degree without giving you your money back. This is entirely the same as my example of a yacht, a degree is no more special than any other kind of purchase- it is an asset that you buy with your time and money. Universities shouldn't be the arbiters of justice and morality, they are businesses and should be viewed as such.

Also I looked it up and this scenario did happen but it happened in Germany. In the US no such thing has happened and as far as I have found there's no legal precedent for taking away a degree for conduct that happened after the degree was earned.

@mutayeb if a pharmacist does that he should be punished accordingly by the law, and upon being released from prison would naturally have a hard time getting a job as a pharmacist, but no he should not lose his degree. Sure the degree is probably useless to him because he is unlikely to get a job in his field but the degree is his property and should not be taken away.

@mutayeb nah man a degree is a thing you buy at a very high price and it should not be able to be taken away. If you buy a yacht the yacht company shouldn't be able to steal your yacht because you used your yacht in a way they didn't like. This fraud he's committed should go on his record and probably give him a hard time getting jobs but I don't think any school should have the right to take away someone's degree. I honestly didn't even know that was a thing. Obviously this is completely irrelevant to the logic of the question but I just thought it was interesting that this is something schools do, it's honestly baffling to me.

@GlamMan same tbh a lot of the time I just get the right answer based on vibes, which probably isnt good because I often can't properly explain to myself why my answer is right

@tdwantsajd that explains why im getting em right bc im part jewish

@GDatria715 the answer doesn't say that we can it says that the only way to detect the existence of a sentient being on another planet that cannot communicate with us is by doing something we cant do, thats the point of it.

I get this I dont think its any of them, C also seems invalid. It's missing the sentence "a study that uses reports that are highly susceptible to inaccuracy cannot reliably determine the causes of human subjects present characteristics". That's an assumption we're making, its obviously a very understandable one but its still an assumption? Wouldn't that make it invalid?

@Rena12345 wait so lushan commited no crime? Thats interesting I would have expected aiding and abetting or something since he did drive the guy there knowing he was going to commit a crime.

If a schools gonna revoke someones degree then they should have to give back all the money they spent on tuition. Idc what they did they paid six figures for that degree.

@GDatria715 the invention of the car put a lot of horses out of work

I got a pt of 163 after lightly studying for 2 weeks so its possible

I don't understand if you retake the exact same drill you'll already know the answers

Wait people who aren't American use this platform? ():

I don't understand how this question was hard it seemed obvious to me. Yet I'll find myself getting questions wrong that 90% of people got right fairly often 😂

i got it right because the other answers seemed worse to me but i was a little confused because to me priscillas argument didn't seem like she was disagreeing with the "promise" or the "potential" of science fiction, more just noticing that science fiction doesn't do better in practice (she was only talking about the skills of the writers and what is more effective in practice, not the potential of the artform itself)

No thats wrong if all of the LSAT questions were perfect I would never get a single one wrong because I'm absolutely perfect and never wrong.

@pbahoura obviously nobody of any intelligence. I doubt a single one of them could get above a 150 on the lsat. I bet they don't even know the difference between sufficient and necessary conditions 😂😂😂

I remain unconvinced takes a drag

Gonna have to stop ya right there aliens absolutely did build the pyramids.

Go back to using Star Wars examples I don't watch Harry Potter