YESSS. I GOT THIS RIGHT!!!

Ugh

I'm understanding the content of the passage well but I'm missing the author's role in the passage. I saw a name, Zanotto's, and assumed that he was the one critiquing the myth when he's just being used as evidence.

I hate conditional logic so much.

Wow. I tried doing my own low-res summaries for this passage. This was insanely hard for me to understand. Ugh.

I'm tired boss...

13/13 ---on easiest lol. Small win is a small win

What a terrible argument LOL

1;40-1:43 - "But because this is a lesson, let's make sure we're clear on why D and E are wrong, instead of dismissing it very quickly for the reason I discussed."

What a breath of fresh air! haha.

Thank you, Kevin!

I can already see what will be the most difficult for me in implied questions.

More difficult questions will have wrong answers that seem like they are implied because of my own unreasonable assumptions. Since the answer choice isn't explicitly stated, how do I differentiate between what is a reasonable and unreasonable assumption to make?

#help

I think this is an instance of an older LSAT question being an older LSAT question. Assuming that air pollution causes cancer is huge assumption that more modern tests won't/shouldn't expect us to do. Blehhh

Okay. I can do this!

I got this one right because I broke down the logic and I'm so proud of myself haha!

Ofc it took me 4:30 to do---but one step at a time lmaoo

Ugh

Here goes nothing 😭

I can't do this

Aw man. I feel like such an idiot when I watch JY's explanations. I need to pay more attention to the stimuli

#help

Any advice on how to get better at reading stimuli. I'm finding that I keep missing obvious things.

WOOO

I got this question wrong and chose C. I'm gonna cry.

Oof I got got.

I suck at implied questions.

I was so confused this time because I was looking for flaw in the stimulus and couldn't find one. Turns out there isn't one. Haha. This is a great example to go over. Thanks 7sage.

#help

I accept that E is the right answer but I can't understand why C is wrong. Could someone explain why?

3 wrong in a row. Oof

#help

I'm finding that the low res summary does not help for more granular questions for harder passages in this section. Questions for these passages will ask for more specific details that I just don't put in the my summaries. I don't record these small details because I am trying to get through the passage quick enough to stay under our time limit. So, when I encounter these detailed oriented stated or analogy questions, I'm forced to re-read the passage with the added pressure of the time I already spent reading.

Is my issue that I'm skimming? I'm realizing that I don't really understand the content of the passage but to understand I would need to take my time more which we can't really do under time pressure.

Does anyone have advice?