YESSS. I GOT THIS RIGHT!!!

Ugh

Coming 6 years in the future to tell you that this is still destroying us.

I'm tired boss...

I think this is an instance of an older LSAT question being an older LSAT question. Assuming that air pollution causes cancer is huge assumption that more modern tests won't/shouldn't expect us to do. Blehhh

Replying to myself. We got this bud!!! PT'ing an average of 165 rn. Gonna keep studying.

I got this question wrong and chose C. I'm gonna cry.

I hate conditional logic so much.

I can't do this

#help

I accept that E is the right answer but I can't understand why C is wrong. Could someone explain why?

I got this one right because I broke down the logic and I'm so proud of myself haha!

Ofc it took me 4:30 to do---but one step at a time lmaoo

Ugh

WOOO

Yeah. At first glance, the split approach sounds crazy but I'm realizing that questions will explicitly indicate which passage is relevant. So, it's possible

I suck at implied questions.

Same

3 wrong in a row. Oof

#help

I'm finding that the low res summary does not help for more granular questions for harder passages in this section. Questions for these passages will ask for more specific details that I just don't put in the my summaries. I don't record these small details because I am trying to get through the passage quick enough to stay under our time limit. So, when I encounter these detailed oriented stated or analogy questions, I'm forced to re-read the passage with the added pressure of the time I already spent reading.

Is my issue that I'm skimming? I'm realizing that I don't really understand the content of the passage but to understand I would need to take my time more which we can't really do under time pressure.

Does anyone have advice?

I'm understanding the content of the passage well but I'm missing the author's role in the passage. I saw a name, Zanotto's, and assumed that he was the one critiquing the myth when he's just being used as evidence.

Wow. I tried doing my own low-res summaries for this passage. This was insanely hard for me to understand. Ugh.

13/13 ---on easiest lol. Small win is a small win

KEVIN YOU ARE AWESOME

I'm finding that Kevin's summaries focus mostly on the function, purpose and perspective of each paragraph to make his summaries shorter.

A mistake that I think that I'm making-that may help you-is writing my summary while reading the passage. When I do that, I'm notetaking which makes it easy to list every new thing because it seems important and which ultimately bloats up my summary. I think that we should really only make the low res after completing the passage. Doing this might help force us to make shorter summaries.

1;40-1:43 - "But because this is a lesson, let's make sure we're clear on why D and E are wrong, instead of dismissing it very quickly for the reason I discussed."

What a breath of fresh air! haha.

Thank you, Kevin!

Yeah. I focused on the verbs for each answer choice. I wonder if this is a good strategy.