Really enjoying 7Sage and it's helping me study with its wonderful explanations. However, there are some bugs that I've experienced that prove to be difficult to manage.

1. When drilling like for every question the website randomly refreshes and goes back to the first question while I'm doing a further question (like 5-6). Sometimes doing this refresh back to back, multiple times per question.

2. In the "Study Plan" feature, whenever I complete a practice section as recommended (perhaps because I do them untimed) they are never marked off as complete.

3. When I finish a week for the "Study Plan" feature, and I manually collapse the week, it does not stay collapsed upon subsequent visits to the page and it's a pain to have to scroll all the way down to get to the portion of the study plan I need (especially because after every drill I'm redirected to the analytics page as opposed to back to there).

4. On a couple of occasions I've paused during a drill and the time for that question reads 0:00 when I submit, making it hard to gauge how long I spent on that question.

Despite these, really good job on the updates, they are really helpful in aiding me to determine my weaknesses for this test and adequately prepare. I really do like the study plan feature and the task list helps me stay focused on what I need to accomplish in a given week.

I would really love to be able to maybe:

1. Open drills in a new tab (from the study plan feature), so I don't have to navigate after completion

2. Quickly view -0 sections. When I do -0 on a section, under the analytics tab where it says LR Progress I can't see that section (to be able to quickly go to the results and review that section), since there is no bar.

3. Open the study plan section and it automatically scroll to the portion of the page I need (i.e. my next drill/section/pt)

I have really enjoyed this site, and my membership. The analytics are unmatched, the lessons are wonderful.

My only concern is that your website is so much easier on the eyes than the LSAC site is. I know how utterly ridiculous that sounds.

The first time I drilled on 7sage, I realized that my eyes did not face the same fatigue that they did on LSAC. I actually got concerned at how comfortable it was.

This is a longshot, but are there visual themes available that would be more similar to LSAC's site, so that I can practice more similarly to the way the test is going to be?

Maybe I am alone in the blue-light fatigue I experience on LSAC, but it doesn't seem to happen nearly as much here. It's been great in terms of allowing me to drill for longer without feeling exhausted, but I am concerned I am setting myself up for failure in a sense, by practicing on nicer equipment than I'll have for the test....Does this make any sense or am I just utterly looney tunes?

Hi 7Sage!

One thing I noticed is that if you accidentally skip the Blind Review while taking a PT, then there is no other option to retake using Blind Review. This makes studying really frustrating, and I think it would be really helpful to have the option to BR even if you know your PT score results. I hope this can be implemented soon!

Best,

Madison <3

Just want to give KUDOS to the design team/administrators! Ya'll ask what we wanted, we told you, and you listened!! Thanks and great job!!

I really like the new score goal setting for the analytics (thanks!), but having taken over 2,000 questions it's really hard to gauge how much I'm actually improving, since moving the percentages takes a ton questions. If there was a way to see how I've performed over the last 2 weeks (or any user defined amount of time) in my analytics, in combination with how that aims towards the goal score, I think that would give me a better idea of how i look at this moment, as opposed to including a bunch of data from when i was really bad at this stuff.

I love the highlighted bar that describes your accuracy on certain question tags relative to the 175+ scorer. It would be cool if there was another bar that also included timing. This could let me know if there are types of questions I spend much longer on without having to look looking at each individual question or drill set to see where I stand for timing.

It would be so helpful if we were able to do the Blind Review but without marks from "taking too long to answer the questions." I would prefer if the Blind Review would just let us know to check which answers are incorrect.

You can import your LawHub PrepTests in your settings.

Should we auto-import your PrepTests by default? For example, we could periodically check if you have LawHub PrepTests and import them in the background, with a setting to opt out of this behavior.

To put the question another way, should LawHub import be opt-in (status quo) or opt-out?

On the actual LSAT it always shows a brief description before the section begins while the break timer has started. So I know what section I'm about to go into before going into it and I get to mentally prepare for RC vs LR during that minute. 7Sage just has a screen with a timer, it would be nice if this description or a similar one could be included.

Hi all at 7sage,

I know you all have said you're working on letting accommodated test takers (and anyone who desires it) remove the experimental/any section from analytics consideration, but I just wanted to throw my hat in the ring that this is urgent. My analytics are literally nearly unusable because they count my experimental which I do not do. I have the accommodation and cannot practice under my test conditions AND have accurate analytics at the same time. This makes 7sage's usefulness very low in terms of just the infrastructure of drilling, for me. I'm hoping this can be a top priority for myself and others with accommodations, but I know you have a lot on your plate, and am grateful for everything you're doing as well as for your continual improvements.

Thanks!

It's really sad that only LSATLab seems to have this option. I like the UI of 7sage better but this is forcing me to use another platform.

It would be helpful if a feature could be added to pin specific drills taken to the top of the list for easy reference later.

The expected accuracy feature, which plays into analytics and priority tags, makes no sense. Say I have consistently scored 155-160 on all of my PTs, but my goal score is a 170, how am I supposed to reach that if it's giving me priorities based on other people in my current score range??? It could say that I have a "low priority' for a specific tag, just because I'm on level with people in my range, but if that range is lower than I am aiming for, it's not a low priority. This feature should be completely overhauled with the option to specifically choose a score range goal, and then it shows the accuracy needed to obtain that range.

If I am misunderstanding something, please help explain JY #feedback

1. On this new website, I do not like how you cannot see the time stamp as the video is playing. Like you aren't able to skip forward and put where you want to watch, as the video is playing.

2. I wish you would have the total time it took you to drill when you are going over your answers.

I wanted to suggest adding a way for users to see their overall average time spent per question for Logical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension across all drills and practice.

Ideally, this could appear in the analytics section alongside existing stats like total questions attempted, accuracy, questions answered per day, average scores, etc. Having an overall average time per question would make it much easier to track pacing improvement over time and understand how close a user is to test-day timing.

It could also be very helpful to break this timing data down by question difficulty (Levels 1–5). Seeing average time by difficulty would allow users to identify whether they are spending too much time on easier questions or over-investing in higher-difficulty questions, which directly relates to pacing and skip strategy under timed conditions.

Since 7Sage already tracks both question difficulty and time spent on individual questions, this would be an aggregate view of data that’s already being collected. I think it would be a useful addition to the analytics tools, especially for students like myself who are working to improve their timing.

Thanks for considering this.

When reviewing questions in a drill, it's helpful that the analytics shows the question history. Would it be possible to also include a quick overview of which AC I selected during my previous attempt(s) without actually clicking on the previous attempt? It would be great to see if I'm consistently picking the same wrong AC, if I'm switching between wrong ACs, or if I had a lucky correct guess during the first attempt. Thanks!

This isn’t exactly a feature request but wanted to check: I’m applying for admissions for Fall 2027, and want to get a bit of a head start on prompts. I realize prompts change ever so slightly from year to year, so was wondering whether the “prompts” webpage will change in a way where I will lose any notes I started on now.