Hey guys! =) I'm still pretty new to the LSAT community but I was wondering if you guys could help me out here. I just became a mom 8 months ago, graduated undergrad a year ago with intentions of being in law school by now and I now work 12 hr night shifts as a respiratory therapist! Annnnd needless to say like the rest of u lovely people, I too still want to go to law school. Lol BUT I am having the hardest time. I do study But the only time I seem to be able to do that is inbetween my rounds at work around 2-4 am! I don't get a whole lot of studying done during the week but I do retain and practice the little bit that I do. Before my son was born I was a zen at studying. I would stop at nothing until the job was done no matter what! But now I can't put the same amount of effort in. I find it impossible to play with my baby during the day, work nights, wake up every 4 hours at night to feed my son on my days off with few or no naps, and still have the energy to study LSAT. By the time I get to it on my days off I am exhausted and I recap the same concept 300 times before I'm able to move on. I guess I just need encouragement...sometimes it feels like I'm moving so slow that I will never get there. I am saving up for my 7sage course (things keep getting in the way of me actually purchasing it smh) so right now I am using the kaplan premier book. Hopefully once I get my 7sage course I can save time and energy by not having to read such dry prose at 4 am. I guess I would like to know how you all do it? How can you lead normal lives and still devote time to the LSAT in an effective and time efficient manner?

Interesting commentary on the cost of law school, purpose vs. payoff, and why anyone would want to open a new law school ...

"What happens when you lower tuition and admissions standards, then let cowboys and single mothers hit the books? UNT Dallas College of Law aims to find out."

http://www.dmagazine.com/publications/d-magazine/2015/may/unt-dallas-college-of-law-little-law-school-that-could

I can't seem to find the answers to preptests 1-35 logic games. When the PDFs were taken down, were the answers also taken down? I can't check my answers to those sections! Am I missing them somewhere?

Hi Everyone,

I'm curious to hear about any stories of significant score improvement. When I say significant, I mean a good 10-15+ point improvement in score (not raw). I took the LSAT in 2013 after cramming for 45 days and during a major time of transition (quit my toxic full-time job, started my own contracting business that sometimes involved driving 120mi daily, relocated, etc.).

Yes, 45 days was dumb. My equation was that I self-studied for the GRE for about the same amount of time and got into the #1 ranked school (at the time) for my master's.

GRE ≠ LSAT

As you may imagine, my score was relatively disastrous and three points less than my lowest expected (hoped for?) score. I'm planning to sign up for the October LSAT, and I'm not feeling very confident. I have yet to apply to any law school.

Thanks

Hey everyone!

Nevermind ... lol

I started out in early November with a 144 diagnostic and have been on a very slow and steady process of trying to understand all this logic AND learn games, I was a noob at games, hard. Anyway yesterday i took June 2008 PT54 and scored a 154 with a blind review of 167! (my best score thus far and my best blind review score by 5 points) things are finally starting to click and I just want to give a REAL LIVE SHOUTOUT to JY and Jon for this website being cheap and easy to access! I made a 148 on my February score which i wasnt ready to take, in an attemmpt just to try and get in this fall, and now i wish i wouldve waited bc my school is leting me retake it for June! Hoping this last month keeps enlightening me and i'm gonna do my best to To get in this fall, if not I KNOW FOR A FACT I WILL DO BETTER AND BETTER WITH 7SAGE's METHODS!!!

How many preptests and reviews did it take for you to overcome your first major plateau? I have increased an average of 12 points from my first cold test thanks to 7sage. I have been stuck in the high 150's and low 160's for 9-10 PrepTests. What is usually recommended in order to make the next step?

I am just getting into the LG bundle and would ideally like to complete it in three weeks. With my work schedule, I can devote six hours a day.

Is this realistic? Right now progress is slow as its all new but, my guess is that my average time per game will speed up as my skills grow. I can only manage one four-game section or perhaps two each day right now.

Will this likely get quicker? If I can learn the bundle in three weeks, I will remain on my schedule.

Hey guys, we're proud to announce that David Busis is our new Editor and we're working together to redesigning the personal statement course.

To aid in the redesign, we're looking to put together a diverse profile of personal statements to use in the course as instructional material. Therefore, we'd like for you to submit your personal statements. If your statement is chosen, we'll help you through some or all of the rewriting process to arrive at a polished final statement. This will come at no cost to you but we'd like to use your (anonymized) drafts as instructional content.

You have to be enrolled in a 7Sage Starter or higher course and have our existing Personal Statement course to submit for this.

Submission

If you'd like to submit, please email dillon@7sage.com (1) your PS draft (2) your undergrad institution, year, degree, gpa (3) your LSAT score if you have it already and (4) your basic demographic info. Please use subject "Personal Statement Submission".

If you have questions, please ask away!

Here's the hello from David himself:

I’m David, a professional writer and editor, and I’m currently redesigning 7Sage's personal statement course. I am a graduate of Yale, where I received a prize for excellence in the English major, and the Iowa Writers’ Workshop, where I received a teaching fellowship. My nonfiction has appeared in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and The Atlantic online. My fiction has won two national contests, received notable mention in The Best American Short Stories 2014 and been anthologized by Autumn House Press. I've taught English and writing at Phillips Academy Andover, the University of Iowa and Southern New Hampshire University. I’m a member of Blurb’s Dream Team of editors and the Editorial Freelancers’ Association. I’ve also been through the law school application wringer myself: I was admitted to Harvard and Yale Law School before I decided to pursue editing.

I'm looking at getting this tablet, mainly so I can study on the go. Has anyone any experience using 7Sage on the Samsung Galaxy Tab 4? Are 7Sage videos and the app compatible? I never owned a tablet before, which is why I am a bit worried about that. If it's not compatible, I won't bother with it. Thanks in advance.

Hello,

I am just confused about the whole system because I just realized that I am unable to download the pdfs anymore due to LSAC's ban. I see that Cambridge has what they call the "Ultimate LSAT Bundle"- it includes 1-70 PTs , organized by type. Is this worth it? Should I simply purchase the prep tests that I need to complete 7 sage course materials and 36-71 PTs?

Please enlighten me!

Hello everyone! this is my first post, as I am about to start studying for the October LSAT. A lot of you mentioned that the Trainer and Cambridge Drilling Packets are very useful but I'm curious as to how you all incorporated that into your 7sage course? I'm thinking of purchasing them so let me know!

Thanks!

My android tablet doesn't let the videos speed up and it's been pretty annoying because one of the best things about 7sage is bring able to speed up the videos! It's a new tablet so I'm not sure if it's a tablet specific issue, but does anyone have any troubleshooting tips? I've tried the 7sage app, on chrome, and the preloaded browser. Thanks in advance!

Update Feb 2017: printable e-docs for the LSAT questions are now included in 7Sage materials.

There is also a list here:

http://classic.7sage.com/preptests/

Q: Why do I need to buy PTs? Why don't you have them?

A: As of April 21st, 2015, all PDFs containing LSAC licensed content have been removed to comply with LSAC's new policy. To be clear, all PDFs containing any LSAT questions - LSAT PrepTests and Problem Sets - have been removed. Any PDFs without LSAT questions are still available.

The removal of PDFs from 7Sage was not our decision, it was the LSAC's decision to ban PDFs. 7Sage is not the only LSAT course to be hit with this. Other LSAT courses also had to remove their PDFs.

To compensate, we have all of the questions listed as silent videos, which are short one-minute videos that show only the question and answer choices. It is much better to study with paper PTs, so pick those up if you can.

Q: What PrepTests do I need?

A: Depends on what course you have!

If you have Starter, you will need PTS 36-44.

If you have Premium, you will need PTs 36-58.

If you have Ultimate, you will need PTs 36-72.

If you have Ultimate+, you will need PTs 36-77. Future PTs will also be added to the course.

(Ultimate+ also has access to the question bank, which has some questions from PTs 1-16 and all from 17-35)

Q: I can't find the PTs included in my course! Can you swap explanations for me?

A: Sorry, we do not swap PT explanations. Please make sure you can find the PTs before you purchase the course, or upgrade to a higher package that includes more explanations.

All courses use some of the questions from PTs 1-35, so it would be a good idea to pick up those as well.

If you've purchased individual PT explanations that are not included in those packages, you will have to get those as well.

From Amazon.com (USA/Canada)

(SuperPrep 1) A, B, C:

http://www.amazon.com/Official-LSAT-SuperPrep-Champion-Prep/dp/0979305063/ref=sr_1_6?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1461037774&sr=1-6&keywords=LSAT

(SuperPrep II) 62, 63, C2:

http://www.amazon.com/Official-LSAT-SuperPrep-II-Champion/dp/0990718689/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1460892256&sr=8-1&keywords=superprep+lsat+2

Games for PTs1-20:

https://smile.amazon.com/PowerScores-LSAT-Logic-Games-Preparation/dp/0982661827/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1467749480&sr=1-1&keywords=powerscore+lsat+game+type+training

Games for PTs 21-40:

https://smile.amazon.com/PowerScores-LSAT-Logic-Games-Preparation/dp/0982661800/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1467749480&sr=1-2&keywords=powerscore+lsat+game+type+training

Also, if you're looking for PTs 41-50 and don't want to spend hundreds of dollars, try this:

https://smile.amazon.com/Manhattan-LSAT-Practice-Book-I/dp/1935707787/ref=sr_1_fkmr1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1467749731&sr=1-1-fkmr1&keywords=manhattan+LSAT+practice+book+1

The book I ordered was used, but came in good condition with minimal markups/notes.

(Thanks, @alex.kirby, for this link!)

1-6, 8, 17, 39 & 40 (EXPENSIVE):

http://www.amazon.com/Actual-Official-Out---Print-PrepTests/dp/1456387049/ref=sr_1_cc_1?s=aps&ie=UTF8&qid=1434326750&sr=1-1-catcorr&keywords=out+of+print+lsat

4-18 (Might actually be 4-14 - book says 1992-1995, but is not specific as to what PT #s)

http://www.amazon.com/Actual-Official-Preptests-ACTUAL-PREPT/dp/B00824WL6C/ref=sr_1_51?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1461038183&sr=1-51&refinements=p_27%3ALaw+School+Admission+Council

7-16, 18:

http://www.amazon.com/Actual-Official-LSAT-PrepTests-Lsat/dp/0942639634/ref=sr_1_19?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1430796578&sr=1-19

19-28:

http://www.amazon.com/More-Actual-Official-LSAT-PrepTests/dp/0979305039/ref=sr_1_6?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1430796472&sr=1-6

29-38:

http://www.amazon.com/Next-Actual-Official-LSAT-PrepTests/dp/0979305055/ref=sr_1_4?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1429744359&sr=1-4

37:

http://www.amazon.com/Official-LSAT-PrepTest-37/dp/0942639812/ref=sr_1_45?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1461038125&sr=1-45&refinements=p_27%3ALaw+School+Admission+Council

36-44 (price fluctuates, try to find a used copy):

https://www.amazon.com/dp/1937707369/ref=cm_sw_r_other_apa_Vo8FxbPCYZQ66

42-51 ($30!!)

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0986086290/ref=od_aui_detailpages00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

43-45:

https://www.amazon.com/PowerScore-LSAT-Deconstructed-Three-LSATs/dp/0980178274?ie=UTF8&keywords=lsat%20deconstructed&qid=1364051525&ref_=sr_1_2&sr=8-2

(Thanks, @VALKIRIA, for this link!)

41-50 (separated by question type, easy to remove and re-arrange):

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1937707784/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1937707784&linkCode=as2&tag=mintowin-20&linkId=e0408798e4a104bf57f50e608724a3fb

51:

https://www.amazon.com/Official-LSAT-PrepTest-51/dp/0976024586/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1468360225&sr=8-1&keywords=PrepTest+51+LSAT

52-61:

http://www.amazon.com/Actual-Official-PrepTests-Comparative-Reading/dp/0984636005/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1429743671&sr=8-2&keywords=Prep+test

62-71:

http://www.amazon.com/10-Actual-Official-LSAT-PrepTests/dp/0986045519/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1429743671&sr=8-1&keywords=Prep+test

73:

http://www.amazon.com/Official-LSAT-PrepTest-73-Sept/dp/0986045535/ref=sr_1_10?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1461037879&sr=1-10

74:

http://www.amazon.com/Official-LSAT-PrepTest-74-Dec/dp/0986045543/ref=sr_1_11?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1461037879&sr=1-11

75:

http://www.amazon.com/Official-LSAT-PrepTest-75-June/dp/0990718697/ref=sr_1_7?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1461037879&sr=1-7

76:

http://www.amazon.com/Official-LSAT-PrepTest-76-Oct/dp/0986086215/ref=sr_1_8?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1461037879&sr=1-8

77:

http://www.amazon.com/Official-LSAT-PrepTest-77-Dec/dp/0986086231/ref=sr_1_11?ie=UTF8&qid=1461037854&sr=8-11&keywords=LSAT

78:

https://www.amazon.com/Official-LSAT-PrepTest-78-June/dp/0986086258/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1469656128&sr=8-1&keywords=june+2016+lsat

From Amazon.ca (Canada)

7-18:

http://www.amazon.ca/gp/product/0979305047?psc=1&redirect=true&ref_=oh_aui_detailpage_o00_s00

19-28:

http://www.amazon.ca/gp/product/0979305039?psc=1&redirect=true&ref_=oh_aui_detailpage_o00_s00

29-38:

http://www.amazon.ca/gp/product/0979305055?psc=1&redirect=true&ref_=oh_aui_detailpage_o01_s02

I cannot find 39-51 for a low price on Amazon, sorry!

52-61:

http://www.amazon.ca/gp/product/0984636005?psc=1&redirect=true&ref_=oh_aui_detailpage_o01_s02

62-71:

http://www.amazon.ca/gp/product/0986045519?psc=1&redirect=true&ref_=oh_aui_detailpage_o01_s02

72:

http://www.amazon.ca/gp/product/0986045527?psc=1&redirect=true&ref_=oh_aui_detailpage_o01_s00

73:

http://www.amazon.ca/gp/product/0986045535?psc=1&redirect=true&ref_=oh_aui_detailpage_o01_s00

74:

http://www.amazon.ca/gp/product/0986045543?psc=1&redirect=true&ref_=oh_aui_detailpage_o01_s01

75:

https://www.amazon.ca/Official-LSAT-PrepTest-75-June/dp/0990718697/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1469665463&sr=8-1&keywords=lsat+75

76:

https://www.amazon.ca/Official-LSAT-PrepTest-76-Oct/dp/0986086215/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1469665453&sr=8-1&keywords=lsat+76

77:

https://www.amazon.ca/Official-LSAT-PrepTest-77-Dec/dp/0986086231/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1469665386&sr=8-2&keywords=lsat+78

78:

https://www.amazon.ca/Official-LSAT-PrepTest-78-June/dp/0986086258/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1469665386&sr=8-1&keywords=lsat+78

From Ebay:

These change often, so I only included a link to a search

http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_odkw=10+Actual%2C+Official+LSAT+Preptests+39-51&_from=R40&_osacat=0&_from=R40&_trksid=p2045573.m570.l1313.TR0.TRC0.H0.X10+Actual%2C+Official+LSAT+Preptests+.TRS0&_nkw=10+Actual%2C+Official+LSAT+Preptests+&_sacat=0

Analytical Reasoning Problem Sets ONLY From Amazon:

1-20

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0615508502/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=opinionnation-20&linkCode=as2&camp=217145&creative=399373&creativeASIN=0615508502

21-40

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0615508510/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=opinionnation-20&linkCode=as2&camp=217145&creative=399373&creativeASIN=0615508510

41-60

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0615508529/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=opinionnation-20&linkCode=as2&camp=217145&creative=399373&creativeASIN=0615508529

No longer selling PTs:

From EveryLSAT

Their license has ran out and they are no longer selling PDFs or PTs.

From Cambridge LSAT

Their license has ran out and they are no longer selling PDFs.

Still selling hard copies: https://www.cambridgelsat.com/preptests/4-section/

If you have any to add, please do!

"Sooner or later, you’ll realize that our lessons are just better and you could have spent those thousands of tutoring or in-person class dollars on a boat."

http://www.getbusymedia.com/my-conversation-with-j-y-ping-founder-of-7sage-com/

Hello you beautiful, beautiful people. So, I've had a wonderful month or so of consistently okay scores. Not where I want to be by June but 3-5 points shy.

I'm now experiencing a dramatic decline across all sections in accuracy and I am FUHREAKING out (e.g., missing 5 per LR section when I had up until last week been averaging minus 4 total for LR). Needless to say I've been pacing like a mad woman who has something to hide because JUNE is now less than 5 weeks away.

Any kind words and/or suggestions would be much appreciated. Kind of at a loss for what to do because my blind review score is still the same, just not in my PTs or drills of timed sections. Merp. Knope out.

Hi All...

Looking at the syllabus, I'm wondering if all the different types of logic games are covered by the course? I bought the lowest level primarily for LG coverage (although I intend to use all of it). I see that all the LGs are explained on the free section of the site but I'm wondering if the course covered how to break down all the different types?

I ask because in one of the videos the instructor said that there are about six types, and I see the Kaplan books I have (on loan from a friend) seems to talk about a bunch of types... Linear, in-out, whatever...

I love music and sharing music, so I want to know what your HAPPY song is!

This is (currently) mine:

Obvious title is obvious. It's catchy and I'm a sucker for catchy songs. (ADHD forces catchy songs to repeat over and over in my head... Sigh.)

To post yours, just paste the YouTube link here!

***I love to write, and I also happen to have a little knowledge about the LSAT and law school admissions generally. With JY’s blessing, I have decided that I will scratch my writing itch on a semi-regular basis by posting long-form blog-style pieces on the forums. If you have a topic that you’d like to see me write about, feel free to PM me. And please, discuss the piece freely in the comments below, especially if you disagree – I love to hear other viewpoints and am happy to engage in respectful and reasoned discourse.

My personal philosophy has always been that fundamentals are paramount because they set the groundwork for true understanding, and true understanding is a foolproof way to do well on anything. Some methods out there eschew a deep discussion of formal logic in favor of more ‘holistic’ approaches, relying on the student to supply their experience with the English language instead. I don’t buy it, and here’s why.

First - if the LSAT gave us everything in “if…then” terms, then I would absolutely agree that formal logic would be mostly unnecessary because everyone understands the “if…then” construction on a very basic level. There would still be some purely logical issues that would need to be addressed (for example, thinking that “if A then B” is equivalent to “if not A then not B”), but those could at least theoretically be addressed without resorting to formal logic mapping. Unfortunately, the LSAC is not so accommodating. Semantics plays a huge role on the LSAT, so we can’t just ignore it as if we lived in some idealized world where “if…then” is the only game in town.

Next - if people were naturally proficient at identifying equivalence between statements, I would also agree that learning formal logic would be mostly unnecessary. But unfortunately, that’s not the case either. The number of students who complain that certain arrangements of conditional statement are ‘convoluted’ or ‘complicated’ speaks to the sheer difficulty of that level of translational proficiency for even the most clued-in students, to say nothing of the average person. Sometimes, even a simple reordering of words can be enough to throw the most astute of students. If you’ve ever missed a conditional indicator because it was in the middle of a sentence, then you know exactly what I’m talking about.

Finally – if there were an easier way to give the required background than what currently exists, then I’d embrace that wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, when we’ve got a conditional (if-then) statement, we need an “if” side (sufficient), a “then” side (necessary), and a way to express the relationship between the two (the arrow). I’m really not seeing how this can be made any simpler.

I take a lot of pride in my ability to teach formal logic, but believe me – I would not teach formal logic at all if I could help it. It is one of the least fun parts of the curriculum for the student, and is very difficult to teach well. It took me years to get even reasonably proficient at conveying the concepts. In addition, once learned, most students go through a phase where they try to translate literally every statement into conditional logic, which I then need to scale back, causing more suffering for everyone. I teach it not because I want to, but because I have to.

Formal logic is not an end unto itself. It is not something where as soon as you learn it, you can go crush the LSAT by mapping everything out. Rather, it is the means – the fundamental first step toward actual comprehension of what’s going on. That comprehension facilitates the application of logic to the facts at hand, because now we’re clear about what the facts actually are. This critically important piece is often overlooked – it doesn’t matter how good your logical skills are if you don’t understand the facts correctly, and screwing up the relationship between two elements is one of the surest ways to screw up the facts.

This is why it always amuses me when people ask whether they have to use formal logic in a question if they can ‘just see it’ (or whatever variation of that metaphor they prefer). That’s actually the entire point. Being able to ‘just see it’ means that you’ve already unconsciously used and understood the formal logic – you just don’t perceive it because the translation is already automatic for you. It’s akin to ‘seeing’ the answer to 2+2: it may be automatic for you now, but there was a time where you had to count it out. That you don’t have to count it out now doesn’t mean that you don’t need to know how it works – in fact, it is precisely because you’ve learned how it works that allows you to avoid counting it out. And if you've ever misinterpreted something even though you thought you could "just see it", that's not just some minor mistake - that's a gaping hole in your logical reasoning instincts because that suggests you've internalized faulty fundamentals. It's the equivalent of going through life thinking 2+2 is 5; what you "just see" winds up being confusing at best, and flat-out wrong at worst. How do you fix that? By going back and learning how it actually works.

When you learn formal logic, it’s important to understand why it works the way it does. A lot of methods just teach formal logic as a series of trigger words and rules to memorize, and in that light it’s entirely understandable why there’s so much animosity toward it. In addition to it being remarkably difficult to apply rules we don’t understand, it also just feels arbitrary – like it’s something the LSAC is forcing you to learn just because. Who wouldn’t get frustrated in that situation?

Conversely, when you understand WHY it works the way it does, several things happen. First, you can ‘prove’ to yourself that the theory itself is sound, which (although it sounds dumb) is an important part of internalizing it. Second, you start to synthesize your existing intuition with the explicit underlying mechanics, allowing you to have principled bases for adjusting your intuition. And finally, because you understand the theory and aren’t just memorizing rules, it becomes much easier to apply the rules appropriately in a wide variety of situations. If you don’t understand why things work the way they do, then you’re forever bound to memorizing lists of words and hoping that no variations show up (though even if you do understand the theory, you’ll still have to memorize some words – sadly, there’s no avoiding that).

So, don’t think about formal logic as just sufficients and necessaries, arrows and slashes, contrapositives and other seemingly-arbitrary rules to follow. That approach misses the mark entirely. The only way you’ll ever be able to consistently parse out complicated sentences is if you have a firm grasp on the underlying mechanics, and you can only have a firm grasp on a set of mechanics if you understand the theory behind it. Formal logic is one of the most important elements of the LSAT, so prioritize accordingly.

Bonus points for those of you who unconsciously translated that last bit into formal logic.

So I just missed being able to get the PDF files without DRM by a few days! I want to be able to practice them over and over, as recommended, but photocopying out of the book is just a major pain in the rear (yes I realize I only need to do it once for each test - still a pain). Is there a source for the PDFs, even if they have DRM? If I can print it once I'm golden.

Hello fellow 7Sagers,

Whelp… unfortunately, after doing so well with studying, I fell off HORRIBLY. At least a month or two has gone by, and I have not even attempted to study. In my defense, I think my mind was not in the right place. I just completed my undergrad studies, and I got a full-time job at a law firm. Now that I have things a little more managed in my life, I think I am ready to really dedicate myself to tackling this LSAT. I guess I am looking for tips, advice, and encouragement. How do you manage your time? Also, what is a healthy amount of time to dedicate to studying a week? Lastly, what are some additonally things I should be doing as a suppliment to 7Sage?

Thanks in advance for your help!

Hi everyone,

I was wondering if anyone could provide some information on how schools take multiple LSAT scores into consideration. Say I take 2 tests: what I've heard in the past is that most schools will take the higher of the 2, but that the top 14 schools will average the 2, unless there is a +/- 6 point difference between the 2 (in which case they will take the higher). Does anyone know if there is any truth to that? Thanks in advance!

Hi All...

New here, and hoping to take the LSAT in June, with just 5 weeks t prepare. Crazy, if I don;t PT with an acceptable score I'll delay until October, which of course means no law school this year.

Anyhow, to give myself the most study time possible I need to make these videos run on my Android tablet. When I try I just get a big black square and nothing resembling video. Does anyone else having it running on an Android tablet? The tabled is a B&N Nook running Cyonagenmod.

Thanks!

Hi All,

This is my first post here. I have a master's degree and have worked in a professional position for about six years (I'm freshly 31). I haven't taken a university course since 2008, and so I have a big span of time where I've no longer been a student. However, I have kept in contact with a few profs from undergrad and grad school.

My question is - how does someone like me handle letters of recommendation? I currently have the best boss that I've ever had, but I'm hesitant to a) reveal to this person that I'm working on exiting my current career path in 2016 and b) ask for a LOR, in light of the person losing me as an employee.

Is it better to just request LORs from previous professors? I have a few who would be willing, but it just seems odd to request a letter from a prof who oversaw my student work in 2006...Unfortunately, I have a history of "challenging" bosses, and so my current boss is the only one I feel would be relatively appropriate for a LOR.

Worst case...would a LOR from a colleague or direct report suffice? Kind of sounds odd...but I'm throwing it out there.

Please help!

Thank you

I just finished the invalid/valid argument form lessons. I just trying to put the pieces together but it is not working for me. How does this tie to the Logical Reasoning and Logic Games? is it only for MBT questions? I have all the cheat sheets next to me for reference but I still don't see how is going to help me. If you guys don't help me, I won't get a 165. /H -------> /165. Thank you family.