General

New post

37 posts in the last 30 days

Hey guys I was at the Active Reading Webinar last night and I typed up a bunch of notes for people who couldn't attend. I had to leave early for work so I didn't get everything but here are the notes I was able to get. Also thank you to Corey, David and the entire 7sage staff for arranging these webinars because they were extremely helpful and I look forward to being on another one tonight.

Active Reading Webinar Notes:

1. What is the Goal of Active Reading: The process of absorbing, contemplating, and engaging with a stimulus or passage to be able to better understand and predict answer choices

• If you learn to do this well it cuts down on the time it takes to find the answers correctly

• Want to make the test emotional because it offers a connection between you and the test and makes taking one an intuitive process rather than just a test. If you make it emotional while reading then you can remember easier. Emotional memories will go into long-term memories rather than just short term.

2. How do you do Actively Read:

READ SLOWLY & TAKE BREAKS: Although this may seem counterintuitive by reading slowly and taking breaks at the end of certain sentences you avoid the “What the Hell did I just read” syndrome. Take the time up front to make sure you understand each sentence and how it fits in with the stimulus

i. This is done while you’re reading and again before you go to the answer choices

Work on Pre-phrasing/anticipating the answer choices:

i. A common misconception is that you can’t anticipate the answer choices in certain types of questions or in RC but this is wrong

1. Even if your pre-phrase is wrong by doing this step you’re engaging with the material more, making an emotional connection and will be able to remember it more clearly

ii. You can only pre-phrase an answer if you understood what you read which was why you need to slow down and understand what you read

Think of this active reading like setting up your game board in logic games:

i. We’ve learned to “spend the time upfront and reap the rewards later” with LG, why not apply that to LR and RC

1. Spend time pre-phrasing anticipating answer choices (i.e. making inferences) with LR

ii. With RC the passage is your game board and your job is to be able to eliminate unnecessary material and be able to locate what you need

1. Take pleasure in the fact that everything you need to answer a question in RC is in front of you on the page

Approach reading everything on the test like a friend who you know lies to you:

i. If someone in real life said a bad argument you’d call them out on it rather than just ignore it, by rushing through and trying to get to an answer choice you give their crappy argument credibility

3. What should I specifically look for to actively Read:

Strength of words: Important because you need to see how the strength of the passage/stimulus relates to the strength of the answer

i. Conditional indicators/operators: “if, unless, must, etc.

ii. “Most, some, all”: These make eliminating answer choices easier because you know it’s out of the scope, this needs to match what was said in the stimulus

iii. Ex: For a MBT Question: If the stimulus says some drugs help with headaches and an answer choice says all drugs help with headaches we know that it is too strong an answer choice

Group Descriptors: How they’re describing the comparison between 2 groups

i. Ask yourself “what do we know”

ii. Do we assume that everything is the same or are there differences between the 2 groups

Correlational phrases and causation phrases: Can help you see the overall flow of the passage and further engage yourself

i. These are helpful because they can help you zero in on a conclusion

4. Know that when you first start this it will take a long time but will slowly become faster almost like a computer program:

• On the webinar we saw one question take over 8 minutes to explain but when he did it in real-time and explained it, it took just over 2 minutes

June 2007 Test Examples:

Note that you can use whatever “system of notation” you like, the main point is to understand why he marked those words and the process at which he used to read and get the correct answer choices

Section 2 Question 15:

15. A new government policy has been developed to avoid many serious cases of influenza. This goal will be accomplished by the annual vaccination of high-risk individuals: everyone 65 and older as well as anyone with a chronic disease that might cause them to experience complications from the influenza virus. Each year’s vaccination will protect only against the strain of the influenza virus deemed most likely to be prevalent that year, so every year it will be necessary for all high-risk individuals to receive a vaccine for a different strain of the virus.

Which one of the following is an assumption that

would allow the conclusion above to be properly drawn?

Marks we made:

1. Circle “Many serious cases”: Defines the parameters of what we’re talking about (strength of words)

a. Could help eliminate an answer if it said “All cases…”

2. Underline influenza: That’s what the subject of the cases are

a. Answer choice could refer to a different disease

3. Dash at the end of the first sentence: “Stop sign that breaks up the stimulus”

a. Allows me to pause and comprehend what I just read before moving on

4. Circle high risk: Describes the individual

a. Bracket the definition they give of high risk (may be useful and breaks up text visually)

5. Circle “only against”: Strong word (strength of word)

6. Underline “most likely”: Strong word (strength of word)

7. Dash after year: This is our premise and enforces the fact that I understand this is the premise

a. “Each year’s vaccination will protect only against the strain of the influenza virus deemed most likely to be prevalent that year”

b. What do we takeaway from this:

i. Vaccine protects only against 1 strain

ii. The strain that is most prevalent that year

8. Underline “so”: Conclusion indicator

a. You need to be actively engaging and ripping apart their conclusion

b. Conclusion: “every year it will be necessary for all high-risk individuals to receive a vaccine for a different strain of the virus.”

c. Stop and compare premise to conclusion

i. High-risk: Used in both the same way

ii. Strain of virus: Used differently

1. P: Most common strain

2. Different strain each year

9. Pre-phrase: “The strain that is most prevalent every year is different, not a continual one strain”

10. Navigate Answer choices and choose D

Section 2 Question 17:

17. Hospital executive: At a recent conference on nonprofit management, several computer experts maintained that the most significant threat faced by large institutions such as universities and hospitals is unauthorized access to confidential data. In light of this testimony, we should make the protection of our clients’ confidentiality our highest priority.

Steps:

1. Read who is saying this: “Hospital executive”, sometimes it seems unnecessary but other times it can help you build an emotional connection to an answer

2. Circle Non-profit management: Relevant subject of the conference

3. Underline “most significant”: Strong phrase (strength of word)

4. Underline “access to confidential date”: States what the problem is

5. Circle “should”: conclusion indicator

6. Underline “highest priority”: Strong phrase (strength of word)

7. Label premise: “Several computer experts maintained that the most significant threat faced by large institutions and hospitals is unauthorized access to confidential data”

8. Label conclusion: “We should make the protection of our clients’ confidentiality our highest priority”

9. Stop and think about this: “At a hospital what should my highest priority be”

a. Shouldn’t it be my health and not confidentiality?

b. Yet computer experts are saying the most significant threat is my confidentiality therefore we’re going to make it our highest priority

c. Is this enough to warrant this?

d. Better yet should we be taking advice from computer experts?

e. If this were real life you would call them out on this in a heartbeat.

10. Takeaway: If you have a prescripted conclusion you need to try and understand why they’re saying what they’re saying

a. “Should”: Makes this a prescripted conclusion

i. Why are you telling me that this is best for me?

ii. After looking at this at a laser focused level we can see the absurdity when computer experts give advice on the most important priority in a hospital to doctors

11. With that in mind we can easily find that answer choice B is correct

31
User Avatar

Last comment monday, dec 14 2015

More app questions

1) Should I let both of my recommenders be evaluators too?

2) If I like my December score and decide to apply this cycle with that score, would the June test be too late to negotiate scholarships?

0

Admin's note: Thread hijacking! I'm turning this thread into the Official Dec. LSAT Discussion. Here's some ground rules, taken from my usual sticky:

We know that everyone will be excited to discuss what was on the December '15 LSAT, but mentioning specifics about the test (e.g., "Question 4 was odd" or "I got B for question 6" or "the 3rd LG was sequencing") can get both us and you in a lot of trouble with LSAC.

Saying that the test was hard/easy without going into detail is okay, but anything more specific is not okay. LSAC monitors this forum.

One exception is you can say which section was the experimental. For example, the LG with "flowers" was experimental. That's okay.

TL;DR: PLEASE don't talk specifics about December's LSAT!

Have fun discussing!

So far we've found out:

Real RC - 27 Questions:

– Gender Studies/Women in Rome

– Black National Theater

– Corporate Crime/Punishment

– Lamarack Theory

Real LG - 23 Questions:

– Concerts

– Pottery

– Office

– Committees

Real LR - 25 & 26 Questions:

– Waste Management

– Dolphins/Elephants

– Amber

– Ships in the Ocean

– Lemurs

– Psychic Girl

– Honeybees

– Vaccine X

– Gold Mines

---------------------------------

@dj768083724's original post:

Going to go with LR with question about elephant seals and dolphins experimental.

(Read Dillon's post and think this should be ok to say, sorry in advance if it is not)

1
User Avatar

Last comment sunday, dec 13 2015

BR

Is it better to blind review immediately after, or at least on the same day as, taking a full PT as opposed to say the next day? While I like to give the questions a fresh look after some rest, I feel as though I may be undermining the process in some way by doing it like that. Of course this includes not looking at the answers until the full BR is done.

0
User Avatar

Last comment sunday, dec 13 2015

Application Help

So the first semester of my senior year just ended. I was originally going to have my apps in about a month ago, but I had to switch one of my LOR references. I just finished finals, so my grades for the semester come out in less than a week. Should I wait to submit my apps until I have my new transcripts sent in to LSAC? I already have my transcripts in, just not with this most recent semester's grades on them. My GPA will probably jump like .02... lol... Basically I'm asking if waiting to submit my apps will be worth the time (like a week total) I will lose before I apply? Everyone's always empasizing that you should get your apps in early because schools work on a rolling basis... what do you guys think?

@Pacifico

@LSATsagha

@nicole.hopkins

0
User Avatar

Last comment sunday, dec 13 2015

Dilemma

So I took the December LSAT. I have taken the LSAT twice before, in undergrad when I thought I was ready to go to law school. It ended up not working out for me at the time (family related issues). I was expecting a pretty good score, I've been taking PT's in the mid to high 160's. But on this test I missed 2 games and would be hopeful for a 160. I don't think I would be putting my best foot forward with whatever score I got. But I do want to apply this year, I have been out of college for 3 years and feel like it is time to go back. Any advice on whether I should cross my fingers with this score or cancel and take the Feb. test?

0

Hello,

For some odd reason, I am having trouble with mastering sufficient assumption questions, despite watching explanation videos. However, I tend to perform very well on necessary assumption questions--it seems much easier to me. Do any have advice or tips or strategies that help get SA questions right consistently. I'm tired of skipping over SA questions because they hurt my score :(

0

What’s your criteria for owning a game? By owning as in- you won’t have to look at that game for awhile and when you come back to it in say 2 weeks or so(or I don’t know in how long really) the speed at which you can recall the inferences won’t have diminished.

Perhaps finishing it well ahead of the suggested time? (like if it’s a 5 minute game- and you finish in 3:30~ 4 mins. Or if it’s a 12 minute game, maybe finishing in 10 minutes or sooner and if it’s an 10 minute game- maybe finishing in 8 minutes.)

After repeating a game for 5 times or so, I find myself plateauing/maxing out time-wise.

Anyway, thoughts?

0
User Avatar

Last comment saturday, dec 12 2015

Advice on Prep Moving Forward?

Hey everyone,

I'm hoping that I can get a bit of candid advice from you (especially from high-scorers).

I booked myself in to write the February LSAT. I need a 160+ in order to have a real shot at any schools.

I've been studying for about 7 months altogether. 3 months last year, then I took a break, and now I've been studying since September of this year.

My diagnostic was a 140. I've written ten preptests since September. I started at a 158 on my first preptest in september, and then went up and down between 151 (lowest) and 159 (highest). My last three tests have been a 158, 155, 158.

I am usually 3-4 raw points short of a 160. My weakest points are RC (-7 per section) and LR (-3 to -7 per section). I've also improved in LG but still not perfect.

I BR anywhere between 173 (highest) and 167 (lowest).

I'm 25 years old and really, really want to get a 160 on the Feb LSAT so that I don't have to wait until 2017 to start lawschool (my parents are also getting on my nerves to be honest).

With that said, I was thinking that my best shot at attaining a 160+ for February is to take either 1 of 2 options:

1) to keep writing preptests, and keep blind-reviewing every question and hope that I can break 160 by sometime before February 6th.

& then pick up the 7sage course if I am not hitting my target score by February (while postponing until June)

2) Pick up the 7sage course, go through it all before February (I'd likely pick up the Ultimate because I hear that it can give me more help for LR), write a preptest or two, and be at my goal score before February 6th (is this realistic? how long does the course take? I can put in 10-12 hours a day.)

What would you do?

Any advice would help.

Thanks in advance!

N

0
User Avatar

Last comment saturday, dec 12 2015

A passage with 9 questions?

Hey all,

I'm currently averaging a 20 on RC (23 BR) and usually do better when I go for less passages with more time on each (3 and a half). I'm wondering if there are any passages with more than 8 questions? and what is the best strategy for picking the objective passages to hit?

Thanks

0

Wednesday’s workshop with Corey was a great success. Now Nicole is going to show us how to get the most out of our blind review process, so that we don’t feel we’re going about the process blind.

Be on the lookout for the link for this conversation at 7:30 pm ET!

Only 25 spots are available! First come, first served!

Friday, Dec. 11th at 8PM ET: Blind Review with @nicole.hopkins

Fine Print (NOTE: you all want to be lawyers; reading fine print is what lawyers do, so READ IT!)

  • We are NOT going to use Skype for these sessions.

  • Instead, we are going to use GoToMeeting.
  • There is a space limit of 25 per session. This limitation is dictated by both GoToMeeting and the function of these workshops, which is interactivity. If we had more people on, the interaction would be scant, at best.
  • Approximately, one half hour before the the scheduled workshop will begin, a link will appear on the forums, inviting you into the workshop.
  • If you want to attend these sessions, you MUST click that link.
  • Here’s an FAQ on GoToMeeting.com: http://www.gotomeeting.com/meeting/online-meeting-support
  • Then, download the application (for your computer or mobile device).
  • Attendance will be on a “first come, first served” basis.
  • Once the workshop is full, it’s full. Nothing to be done.
  • Chances are, if you’re going to be late, there is a strong possibility you won’t make it in.
  • There will be no recordings of interactive workshops.
  • If there is demand, we will repeat interactive workshops at different times.
  • These groups work best when folks from ALL stages of prep and with all different goals join in! Not just for "super-preppers" and definitely not just for the casual LSATer (does such a person exist?).
  • The only expectation anyone has for these calls is for you to have fun and ask questions as you desire. We are just a bunch of LSAT lovers who gather via GoToMeeting and intellectually slaughter each test.
  • 1

    I wrote the LSAT today and definitely did not score anywhere close to where I had been scoring on my preptests...so it looks like I will be re-writing sometime in 2016 (probably June). I only self-studied for 1 month for my LSAT today so I was thinking of taking a 7Sage course in preparation of my next test. Any recommendations on which 7Sage course to sign up for and how much time I should give myself to properly prepare for the next time? I was scoring 169 - 171 during my self study but I will be amazed if I cracked 160 today on the real thing.

    0

    UPDATE: There is a schedule change. Saturday’s Flaw/Assumption workshop (12/12) will be repscheduled. We have something in the works. When we have more definite details, we’ll let you know.

    NOTE: If there is a workshop tomorrow, there will be a time change. It will now be at 1:00 EST instead of 8:00 EST.

    0
    User Avatar

    Last comment friday, dec 11 2015

    Percent of Answer choices

    You know the Lsat Grader tells you the respective percent of people who chose their answer from A to E, is this reflective of answers chosen by the actual test takers or just sage students? Thank you in advance!

    0
    User Avatar

    Last comment friday, dec 11 2015

    Tracking Help.

    I have been looking (in the discussions) for links to excel documents that other 7sagers might have made during their course of LSAT prep but haven't found any yet. Can anyone please share the excel sheets (or any other kind) that you made to track your study progress, each section progress, questions to be done, analysis of issues, foolproof method, PT analysis...hope you get the gist. It would save a lot of time. Plus it would help to see if there is something missing from my list. Thank you.

    0

    I need help with this question

    Admin note: Please review the forum rules.

    @"J.Y. Ping"

    said:

    3. Do not post LSAT questions, any copyrighted content, or links to content that infringe on copyright. Not a good way to take the first few steps down a long road that is your legal career.

    I crossed off E because it was making a recommendation while the conclusion says "Nonetheless, federal expenditures for nationwide soil conservation programs have remained at ridiculously low levels" which is just saying their spending is low. So with main conclusions the answer can be something it implies as well because I thought it had to paraphrase the conclusion. I choose D stupidly after which simply restates the premise.

    0

    When I do the SA quizzes, I do exceptionally well. Actually, I have gotten all of the problems correct. However, when it comes to actually doing the SA problems on the test, I have a hard time transcribing the majority of the SA problems.

    Can someone please give me advice on how to overcome this.

    Very frustrated!!!

    Admin note: Please don't post titles in all caps.

    0

    I took the LSAT back in Feb. and I got a 138. Yea that score isn't getting me to any law school. So I just took the Dec one after I took a prep course. I am applying to 24+ schools and I already have majority of the applications finished. I am just waiting for the score now. I heard you can submit your app. before you get score...? But how do I do that without them saying "oh we're going to take the feb score?" Or should I just wait til I get my score?

    0
    User Avatar

    Last comment thursday, dec 10 2015

    LG progress

    Hey,

    Just getting into LG curriculum and wondering if everyone else started off extremely slow too? I find that I'm spending way too much time on certain questions with the obvious intention of improving my speed as I go along.

    Does everyone start off this way? It's kind of discouraging, but the bright side is that I AM understanding what I'm learning, and with the additional time, I seem to come up with the right answer about 90-95% of the time. By the way, not talking about a whole lot of time - just a couple extra minutes per game than what would be expected on test day.

    Thanks for the advice!

    0
    User Avatar

    Last comment thursday, dec 10 2015

    Oct vs. Dec 2015 Test

    Just sat to write the Dec. I did a look back at october LR's section to compare. In October, only 1 argument part-role question and 0 main point questions. December several of both. Anyone else notice that?

    0

    "Without strength or endurance, the fight is all but lost."

    This is #5 on the quiz on complex conditional translations to lawgic.

    We are to translate this into lawgic and write the contrapositive.

    So I figured for statements containing “unless, without, until” we are to negate sufficient and leave the necessary alone.

    Following that formula- I got

    ~L—> S or E (if the fight was not lost, there was either strength or endurance)

    ~S and ~E—> L (if there was neither strength nor endurance, the fight was lost)

    But according to the answer, the correct translations are as follows,

    ~S or ~E—> L ~S—> L ~E—> L

    ~L—> S and E

    The “or”s and “and”s are switched. What did I miss in translating this?

    I understand the logic of A or B —> C

    That is, either A or B will get you C, and clearly that’s what’s applied in the correct translation it seems.

    Does the formula (the one pertaining to unless,without, until) not apply in this situation?

    If so, why does it not? Does “without” have a different meaning here?

    0

    Hey all, Congrats to those that finally conquered the LSAT this past Saturday. As an Lsatter that plans to take the exam in June Reading Comp quickly went from my strongest section to my weakest since I began my prep and I was wondering if there were any books that anyone on here recommends for Reading Comp. I have the Powerscore trilogy but the RC book is not as acclaimed. I plan on watching @nicole.hopkins webinar for reading comp for any tips I may find. For people that ultimately did well on RC, was there a source you used for help or was it one of those things that came after practice?(I've also read The Trainer, LG Bible and I am half way through the LR Bible while drilling after each chapter and reviewing afterwards atm btw).

    0

    Confirm action

    Are you sure?