I thought that the flaw was that Arnot said changes IN the government can cause... but then he responded by saying that the government can't be trusted to act in interest of the public. thats why I chose D cuz Arnot wasn't talking about changes by the government, but changes in it.

I do see why A makes more sense though. I guess changes in government would have to be made by them

this is my fave reply section

getting this right felt SOO GOOODDDD

So does likely/unlikely mean causal? or is it just in this context

this is literally the 10th time Ive picked the wrong answer from the right between the last 2 I was considering

I wrote this out as:

change →motive

harsh c →UC→motive

harsh C→motive

-----

conc: change →harsh C

The way I wrote this out made me choose the wrong answer cuz I was looking at change and not harsh C as the sufficient statement, but I'm not sure how what I diagrammed is wrong?

this made me wanna pull my hairs out

Completely read this wrong. I thought since medical treatments cause the "I disease", the conclusion had a flaw since medicine that would remove all "I disease" would cause it as well. LOLL

Mapping this out helped;

neg news -- harm econ -- damage confidence -- spend less $

Econ: confidence is correlated with your own economic state

- immediately I thought but the overall economy affects our own economic state

idk man i got this right without understanding the text at all again... but its so UNSATISFYING

#help My issue with this is that I would translate it to

U→F

/SU→/SF

I get the answer, but not sure how to refrain from translating it to this instead

#help for B, if other birds can lay claim, then wouldnt they be able to lay claim in the same spot and then compete against each other? or is that just too much assuming..

ugh i thought this was saying "this is impossible, but I figured out why it was right" not why it was wrong..

i know I'm screwed when i can only eliminate 2 answer choices

got it right but at what cost.. 10 freaking minutes

ugh I had D then I changed it because I thought "any organization" was too vague, and I was also not sure why they only mentioned tech revolution

I did it this way and it worked:

it tells us

1. /C & U --unlikely-- History as MT

2. KH inc. --MJ dec.

Conclusion: KH inc. --less likely--History as MT

B tells us: MJ dec--more likely--/C & U

this connects everything since it would be

KH inc. -- MJ dec.--more likely--/C&U--unlikely--History as MT

this would mean KH inc.--History as MT which is our conclusion.

My issue is that I would translate this to if A and B, then C. is this wrong?

didnt choose D because I thought jsut because a species is indifferent doesnt mean its important to us?

5/5 on strong i wanna cry

tried to go for speed and D got me

I have an issue with the wording "take for granted". I eliminated E because I thought it was saying that the argument does not realize that an almost even % in votes can cause a sharp division, which doesn't make sense to me since the argument is saying that there is a sharp division due to the almost even % so i dont see how that would weaken it?

why did i read E as, they enter day care A DAY later.. lol

this was SO HARD

not sure how i get every question with higher difficulty right, but then none of the "easy" ones