My first thought regarding the cheese and death by bedsheets correlation was that cheese can contribute to sleep disturbances. These disturbances may cause individuals to have more vivid nightmares. Hence, this could explain how A (higher cheese consumption) causes B (# of people who die by becoming entangled in their bedsheets). I thought the "duh it's wrong" attitude was not helpful, as there actually could be an explanation that links the two claims together. Additionally, I think this is wrongfully leading people to give up if the explanation isn't a given (which is exactly how the LSAT wants to trick you). #feedback

Yeah so today was not the day to humble me severely over and over again

....what?

3/3 but then blind review made me second-guess myself, and I changed 2 to the wrong answer....humbled yet again.

These drills at the end of the modules actually make me feel like I haven't spent over a month of my life already grinding this curriculum. 3/5. Humbled.

I am aware that Q3 uses logic game-type thinking. I'm assuming that learning these techniques will be helpful in solving questions like this on the exam, even if logic games themselves have been phased out of the exam.

Passage 2 humbled me so bad that I'm considering a different career path

Can someone please share their strategy for these questions? I can't find anything that works for the life of me. #help

I think chaining the lawgic claims at the end is the hardest part. Does anyone have any tips that helped simplify it for them and make it click?

I'm just here to throw in another simplified example that shares the characteristic of the Kumar example.

You can eat strawberries every day only if you have strawberries.

Jenna has strawberries.

Therefore, Jenna eats strawberries every day.

This does not mean Jenna eats strawberries every day. It simply states that if you have strawberries (the necessary condition), then you can eat them every day (the sufficient condition).

Anyone else quick to eliminate the answer choices that are definitely wrong, but then you stare at the remaining one (the correct answer) and second-guess it for a minute?

I agree with many of the comments regarding the difficulty of distinguishing between a rhetorical question and a sincere one.

Could someone please share their process for answering questions like this?

These you try questions are getting worse and worse

Anddd this is my cue to log off for tonight

I have to admit, compared to all other question types so far, this one has been the toughest for me. We are repeatedly advised not to make assumptions, yet disregarding information that has been cemented in our minds is difficult.

what is going on

Anyone else having a hard time mapping this out mentally? I notice I get the right answers, but I'm still 20 seconds over target time.

I mean, come on, first Pat, now these damn raspberry nurseries.

I just want to share my experience so people don't feel alone. I struggled for a long time with drilling questions. I thought I'd never be able to do it. Now, I can drill them out correctly under time, and if not, I can appreciate a wrong answer as a chance to sharpen my skills. My greatest advice: keep a wrong answer journal, write out exactly why the correct answer is correct, and why all of the other answers are wrong. After some time, revisit questions in your journal and redo them blind. That'll show you if you have since gathered enough skill to complete it, or if it's still an area of difficulty. This has helped me tremendously.

Lol is there a way to solve these questions without a headache?

second-guessing and switching to an incorrect answer in BR pains my soul

The more I do these drills, the more I lose hope for my dream score :D I'm not giving up, just sharing so that if anyone else is also struggling but has been working really hard, you are not alone!

Awesome article to tell us all to lower our egos, accept we were wrong, and grind a question out until we understand how wrong we were, why we were wrong, and how we can now become right

wtf