User Avatar
ChrisMartin321
Joined
Jul 2026
Subscription
Core

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided Goal score: 175
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided

Discussions

User Avatar
ChrisMartin321
Yesterday

@studyever1234 it seems a little pointless really would just eat up time if you tried to use it in test

1
User Avatar
ChrisMartin321
Yesterday

I'd read it wrong and thought it said the cat was murdered

1
User Avatar
ChrisMartin321
6 days ago

5/5 EZ

1
User Avatar
ChrisMartin321
6 days ago

@AvaCapri Yes, it says you must do one or the other is what it says, we are only to believe what we read in the argument we can't add facts ourselves

1
User Avatar
ChrisMartin321
6 days ago

so, the more you need to assume the weaker your argument is? like Disney you can only do two things for the pass vs we assume a lot about the tiger

2
User Avatar
ChrisMartin321
6 days ago

@RaniaQadi yeah and if the salmon was on the floor then how did the cat eat it? it doesn't say partially eaten salmon

1
User Avatar
ChrisMartin321
Tuesday, Jul 14

@HannahVelasco ummmm the only reason it talks abt tigers is cause it supports the fact the not all mammals make good pets

At least I think that's right

1
User Avatar
ChrisMartin321
Tuesday, Jul 14

@cmata sounds right

1
User Avatar
ChrisMartin321
Tuesday, Jul 14

@BrydenSolonar that makes sense

1

Confirm action

Are you sure?