@danjpeach96 That some guys score worse when their out on a no-boat.

I think.

@MR.Washington the latter.

@ReganWilliams It sounds plausible.

It could refer to Politicians, Editorialists, and Voters.

But, I'll say it most likely refers to Editorialists and Voters, given these are the ones who acted on "politicians' personal attacks".

Why, you may ask.

I don't know, I have to say.

It just one angle.

Doing this from my phone while waiting for puppy to be groomed, is just superlative efficiency.

@Okknicoleee lol. Everything is gonna be fine. I don’t even understand the process through which my mind goes when I am looking for the answers… somehow the answers will come to you.

These basics are very reassuring.

3/3 after successive failures in the single-question previous exercises. I do not like pressure, but it seems I thrive with it.

This dude spoke too fast on this sumary.

The zebra example is diabolical.

Lord have mercy.

It makes me nervous that the assumptions section is looking pretty logical or basic. I hope I am not missing the real point.

Lol.

Hi. I am starting with this... are you guys open to beginners?

This is so very true. The Syllabus of SCOTUS rules always states the conclusion (actual ruling) and only later relays the reasons for its decisions. It's amusing how you can see this when reading the tariff ruling, for example.

I wonder If should keep with the basic part. I understand the argument structure and how its parts correlate to each other. I am also a little concern missing any important small details included in this section...

I guess I'll continue going through it.

@EmmaSmith I think the circle means the biger part, that include the arrow. While the opposite is not posible. Like continent and content.

If they are two circles mean the relation goes both ways. Like John is friend with Michael, as much as Michael is friend with John.

Hope it helps, In case is still needed. I'm starting this as well.

Hi there. Trying this today.