@MarcosGuzman415 Don't thinK I know it. And if so, I did not remembered it. Nonetheless, I take the "without" as /, and it worked out.

So I got the right answer, but my only hint was 'IF', meaning I did not diagram or use any learned estrategy.

I undestand de conditional indicators idea, I cannot grasp how to apply them to the stimulus, so far. I can indetify premises, but that appears to be it.

Progress, I guess.

@CScheresky and yet, it was one step ahead of what I got. I was between D and E, but completely missed the "only if"...

This is the sweetets lesson I have found on this site ever. The fact that I can pick any part of the clause and make the SC, on volition.

I cannot convey how happy this is making me RN.

@DiyaOmkar219 Always = All, Every.

IMHO

The mid sentence "If" is karmatic.

It will help you to diagram.

Diagraming will help you to get to answer easier and faster.

@CourteousWelcomingBathroom My take is if the premise read "the water is solid" then, solid will be the water for the exercise. No more reasoning added.

Is it true in real world? No. And that does not matter when it comes to resolve de question.

@SarahShaver Given your premises, your conclusion is valid.

I think this could be a diagram of it.

@GordonGianadda Try the idea of Continer (SuperSet) Content (Sent).

Super Set always has to be bigger thant the set.

Think of a Matryoshka doll.

Very first time diagraming and it was actually helpful.

@danjpeach96 That some guys score worse when their out on a no-boat.

I think.

@MR.Washington the latter.

@ReganWilliams It sounds plausible.

It could refer to Politicians, Editorialists, and Voters.

But, I'll say it most likely refers to Editorialists and Voters, given these are the ones who acted on "politicians' personal attacks".

Why, you may ask.

I don't know, I have to say.

It just one angle.

Doing this from my phone while waiting for puppy to be groomed, is just superlative efficiency.

@Okknicoleee lol. Everything is gonna be fine. I don’t even understand the process through which my mind goes when I am looking for the answers… somehow the answers will come to you.

These basics are very reassuring.

3/3 after successive failures in the single-question previous exercises. I do not like pressure, but it seems I thrive with it.

This dude spoke too fast on this sumary.

The zebra example is diabolical.

Lord have mercy.

It makes me nervous that the assumptions section is looking pretty logical or basic. I hope I am not missing the real point.

Lol.

Hi. I am starting with this... are you guys open to beginners?

This is so very true. The Syllabus of SCOTUS rules always states the conclusion (actual ruling) and only later relays the reasons for its decisions. It's amusing how you can see this when reading the tariff ruling, for example.

I wonder If should keep with the basic part. I understand the argument structure and how its parts correlate to each other. I am also a little concern missing any important small details included in this section...

I guess I'll continue going through it.

@EmmaSmith I think the circle means the biger part, that include the arrow. While the opposite is not posible. Like continent and content.

If they are two circles mean the relation goes both ways. Like John is friend with Michael, as much as Michael is friend with John.

Hope it helps, In case is still needed. I'm starting this as well.