These lessons are killer! Short and to the point, I can see how this type of analysis will be beneficial to tackling these questions.

Hola!!

Vibes are key bro I feel

Ok as someone who is apparently really good at these questions, here are some things that I do that have gotten me the answers correct in under a minute:

1. Keep in mind what kind of parties the stimulus is talking about. In this question, we’re talking about two entities. Look for an answer that also is concerned with two (or however many) entities that map over to the stimulus.

2. Don’t worry if you don’t really understand what the stimulus is saying. It’s really not that important as long as you have a decent hold on what the stimulus is mapping out logic wise. Go over to the answers and choose which one you think matches best. There’s usually only two answers that even come close.

3. Read all the answers thoroughly while referring back to the argument in your head.

4. Don’t worry so much about picking an answer or skipping over one too quickly. For me, the right answer has almost always presented itself as the best out of all options, even if I don’t quite understand what it says.

PUT ME IN COACH

Call me Mike Ross bro no way I got this right

4/5 on hard. I’m stoked on these questions, much needed pick me up after NA

I wish I could upload a photo of the bibble on fire meme. Anyways, I love these questions

In addition to jakekane's comment, the answer says "without justification." In my head, even though it was not a very good justification, the author still did provide some justification for his statement (ie. his personal expirience)

It doesn’t say the only outcome, it says the only PROBABLE outcome. That’s kind of what did it for me, because while there may be other possible outcomes, the two most probable are stated in the stimulus.

BAGGED

Brain rot

Definitely think A is a better option but it also falls a bit more into the support or PSA cat.? idk

if you saw my comment about skipping these questions on the exam... i retract my statement. Just had my ah-ha moment. Sometimes it takes a while but we must push forward my lads

finally got one

I will 100% be skipping these on the test because wtf

dude yes

These explanation videos are def helpful but I am a little lost on how we are going to get these types of questions right on the exam when it could take a minimum of 2 minutes to write out all this info as JY does....

Bro B is totally an acceptable answer idc what LSAC says. It bridges the gap sorry not sorry.

Starting to feel like its best to go with my gut on these

Wow 30 minutes into studying today and I already need a break

LOL yikes

Im about to try this on hardest level will update. I know everyone will be anxiously waiting

Thanks x a million !! That does make sense and I appreciate you taking the time to explain haha

For #3 - watching the explanation video doesn’t clear much up. JY states that

S (self motivated) NOT O (done for others) - (ARROW) - Not justified.

But if you flip this, then it would be:

justified - NOT s YES o.

That would make many of the answer choices correct. I did a terrible job of explaining that but if someone can decipher and explain that would be great.

Explanation video in question: https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-114-section-4-question-23/