Anyone else having a difficult time figuring out the subtle assumption in weakening questions? Usually I can sort of figure out how to weaken the arguments. But have difficult time figuring out what this subtle assumption is.

Exactly how are we suppose to find out what it is?

http://classic.7sage.com/lesson/animal-navigation-weaken-question/

(above example)

Hi there,

I was wondering if anyone knew of any simulated test centres in Toronto that I could register to take the LSAT at before the actual test?

Thanks so much!

Hi everyone!

I started 7Sage's Ultimate Course January 1st (I really took my New Year's resolution of actually studying to heart lol) and have worked my way through almost all of it. I skipped the logic game sections as I went through the course because I didn't have time to foolproof since I work full time. Now I'm going back and working through the games.

My problem is this: I began the course with the aim of taking the June 2015 test. However, I am now a few weeks behind in the curriculum and have yet to take a practice test (it's almost March--yikes!). I'm not willing to take this test until I am scoring where I want to be scoring on the PTs (mid-high 160s would be ideal) since I've already taken the test once. Would it make sense to just hold off until October? I work full-time but I'm almost at the point where I'm willing to take time off to study (ie find a new job/opportunity after finishing apps). At the same time, it'd be nice to get the June test done so that I can take all summer to work on rounding up letters of rec and working on essays.

What do you guys think? What has been your experience in finishing up the course and then taking practice tests-is there enough time to improve by the June test?

Thanks so much for your help! I really enjoy this community-oriented discussion page. It really makes you feel like we're all on the same boat, albeit going at different rates haha :)

Hello Everyone

I am looking to take the June LSAT, and I think it would be great to find a fellow study buddy here in Atlanta, GA. I work fulltime in Atlanta, but I am willing to work around my schedule to devise a feasible study schedule. I started the 7 stage curriculum at the beginning of this month, and I also took an in class LSAT course back in October. Hope someone is interested!

Thanks,

Kristen

PS: Skype is another option.

I've been working on LGs the past couple of weeks and I realized that Grouping games are my lease favorite, especially the ones with sub categories. I've memorized the rules but when I'm working on these games I get confused and sometimes it messes up my game boards. I've noticed that I'm always scared to get rid of a rule because I think I'm doing it wrong. Such as when the sufficient is failed the rule becomes irrelevant but i'm still scared of placing a & b in the same in/out slot. Is there any other methods you've used on these rules? Or should I just continue practicing on these game types?

I know that a lot of people state that you should try to drill with the older exams and take full PT with the recent exams. What exams are considered "recent" in order to take full timed PTs?

This doesn't have specifically to do with the LSAT, but I am sure that somebody on here knows the answers. I plan on beginning law school next fall (2016), which means that my early decision application (for SMU) is due this November 1, however they only have their Fall 2015 application open - even though the deadlines to turn it in has passed. I was just wondering if anybody knew generally when applications are posted? Thank!

Hi,

I've just started using the program and I'm liking it a lot so far, but I'm already anticipating a bit of difficulty keeping all of the materials organized. Does anyone have a system that's working especially well for them?

Currently working through the core curriculum and starting the pain of Lawgic. Today's session was learning the nine argument types and "some", "must" theory.

I pretty much get it all but struggle as I am not yet far enough along to see this theory in practice with actual questions.

Do you find that the theory, if you don't fully get it during the videos, falls into place somewhat when put in context with actual questions?

Confidence is a bIt low!

Does LSAC ever post your LSDAS GPA?

I have the "Ultimate" package and am currently about 20% through the core syllabus. No prep tests yet aside from the diagnostic.

Just realized I have been forgetting to blind review the problem sets at the end of each module. I have been making sure I don't proceed until I know where I went wrong with each question - but I forgot to do the actual blind review method.

Will this put me at a huge setback? Obviously I will be doing it from this point forward. Hopefully, being only 1/5 of the way through the core syllabus, it won't have set me back too much.

Thanks,

J.

Hey guys, I’m in the middle of the Weakening section of the curriculum and its kicking my ass. I’s getting all the questions wrong. Can someone please offer and explanation on attacking them? I really don’t understand what JY means by not attacking the premise or conclusion.

Any explanations would be greatly appreciated.

That is the question. I have found that JY will sometimes ignore logical indicator language in a stimulus (always, the only, unless, etc...) for no reason whatsoever and not really explain why he chose to ignore those indicators. Instead, he'll use simple argument analysis. Did I miss a lesson? I'd love to know what criteria people have come up with to know when it's more effective to avoid using Lawgic. JY, you're more than welcome to answer this too, of course.Thanks.

Hello folks,

I am trying to get some thoughts on the whole Lsac Account issue. My acct expires in May '15. Last time I took the Lsat was in 2010 while in grad school and I've been working full time ever since then. I understand once you register for the Lsat it extends for another couple of years. I was planning for June '15 but after recently joining the 7sage nation, I realized I will definitely need more time. Is it wise to allow my account to expire since I don't know when I will be well prepared to take the Lsat this year? Any feedback will be helpful. Thanks.

Hey 7Sagers,

We recently implemented a new member type to those who (1) was or is a ⭐ member; (2) was or is active and helpful on the discussion forums; and (3) verified with us that they have a 170 or higher LSAT score: Sage! What comes with this new title, you ask?

-A fancy "Sage" title on their username instead of the common "Member" title.

-Everyone else's envy.

So if you see one of the Sages posting on the forum, give them a high five (before you ask them questions :P)

Hi Admins:

I was wondering if y'all can please add an upload photo option? I find that sometimes it is time consuming and confusing for me to write a comment because some comments are better with a picture and not just words and symbols. For example, I'd like to take a pic to show fellow 7sagers my game board set up, and also lawgic drawings that may be confusing even with the symbol indicators. This also saves me lots of time, than to write it out again.

Just a thought :)

Thanks!!

Since PT 1-35 are already used in the curriculum, is there a way 7 sage can provide the full section LR and RC sections for PT's 1-35 to students who already purchased the course?

Hey 7Sagers,

Had someone write in with a question that I thought you could help out with! Here it is:

I’m having difficulty with regards to the accuracy of my BR abilities. I’m already heavily stressed during timed pt. And I don’t have the confidence/ memory to remember to circle the questions.

My mind is already heavily condensed with information. It’s a fault in my capabilities, but i want to be honest and realistic with myself.

So, what about this amended BR method

Day 1: PT 40/Timed

Day 2: New clean copy of PT 40 Un-timed

Then grade both copies/ watch video & keep track of missed questions.

So, my account will end today and I've taken the LSAT and I'm done, hopefully (that depends on my Feb. LSAT score). I've studied for over a year. Unfortunately, it was difficult to balance working 50-60 hours with studies, but it's all in the past. Here's what I've learned, and I hope this helps everyone else who's starting to study or is in the process of studying:

1. Learn the Logic (conditions, reversals, everything)! - 7sage does a wonderful job with explaining it, so spend a lot of time understanding it. The curve breaker questions require heavy use of conditional logic and logic overall, so, if you know Logic, this will be put you up there. I remember a quote from an LSAT book it said "if you don't learn logic, you're destined to go to law school in Tijuana". Sad, but true - although I don't know if there is a law school in Tijuana :)

2. Logical Reasoning - I used LR Bibles, LSAT Trainer and Manhattan study books in conjunction with 7sage, and while some may say they tend to conflict one another, I found them to actually compliment each other (e.g. in my opinion Manhattan LR book does a better job at explaining NA/SA questions than the Bibles do, whereas The LSAT Trainer is the best at explaining Flaw/Weaken questions).

3. Logic Games - Practice, practice, practice. I improved on Logic Games within 2 weeks of studying and what I did, is I printed like 50 logic games, 4 copies of each and I did and re-did them until I got every single one right. Once you see the patterns, the questions come naturally.

4. Reading Comp. - I am not an expert and this was my worst section, but The LSAT Trainer is the best tool along with Reading Comp Bible. But, in my personal view, it is very difficult to improve on this section.

5. Practice Tests - I used 7sage for the blind review, but there were times where I was having hard time understanding the explanations (especially for LR section - sorry 7sage). Two weeks before my test I found lsathacks.com and I think they do the best job at explaining LR. The idea behind LR argument questions is to reduce the question stem into conclusion and evidence and do what's required (weaken, strengthen, find flaw, you get it). Best part, it's free.

Good luck everyone!

Hi Sages, I was just wondering if older PT's will ever go on sale? Thanks for entertaining the idea.

http://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-66-section-3-game-1/

For this game, the instructor said "J" and "O" can't be stacked together because the rule is: "J" comes earlier than "O." If "J" is stacked with "O," with "J" in the a.m. and "O" in the p.m., isn't that still J - O?

Hello,

From watching JY's videos I thought I had the Fool Proof Method down pack but now I am unsure.

I currently give myself 8 mins on a LG in the course. Then I watch the Game Board Setup/questions videos and check my answers. Then if I missed any of the questions I print out 10 copies. I usually print 10 copies of each game, just for extra practice. Even on the games I get a 100% I just like to go back to them in a few days/weeks/months and work them out again to make sure I understood the game. But I'm currently working my way through the Intro to Grouping Games: In/Out Games and I noticed that when I printed out the 1st problem set in the instructions it said:

1. Complete each LGs in less than 10 mins.

2. Fool Proof Review - Is this the same way I've been doing it before?

3. Check your answer

So I wanted to clarify if I'm actually doing it right? Or am I missing a step?

Hi I took the December LSAT after studying using the beginner course (and disappointed), now I plan on taking the June LSAT. I purchased the upgraded course with everything. Looking for advice for hitting these bonus problem sets. Should I do all the weakening in a row for example? Or should I throw some parallel problem sets in between to make it more like the test. Is it best just to focus everything on one set at a time? If you are reading this and have been in a similar spot please let me know what felt right for you. Thanks

Hi there! Has anyone here had the experience of interviewing for a law school? One of the schools I'm applying to has interviews and since it's not the norm, I can't find much on the topic.

If you have interviewed, could you tell me what it was like and what kinds of questions they asked? Was it comparable somewhat to a job interview?

And what kinds of questions, if any, should I be asking them? I'm a little nervous for it so words of wisdom would be much appreciated! Thanks!

Requirements:

PTS - 165+

Be reliable.

That's it :) message me