All posts

New post

548 posts in the last 30 days

Oftentimes when I watch JY's explanations, I feel like 'wow I never would have made that inference on my own' or I still don't understand at all. So I obviously need work but I'm not sure how to approach my Games practice. When I fool proof, I tend to feel like I'm memorizing and just brain dumping versus practicing and making inferences on my own. I need a 'Games for Dummies' guide-- a really straightforward approach for a neurodiverse brain, as someone who Games are not intuitive whatsoever. I've done the CC and I practice memorizing logic rules a few times a week, so not knowing the basics isn't the issue. I try to set up the games without watching JY's videos and sometimes I do really well--I often solve it using a different approach than JY takes. And sometimes I'm solving 5/5 difficulty on my own and they feel like a breeze. But other times, I get pretty stuck on one of the questions and I end up having to watch the video for support. But when I do that, I feel like I miss out on the practice of making inferences for myself and I really need that practice. Comment if games aren't exactly intuitive for you and tell me what has worked!

0

Hi! Should I be following the Syllabus all the way through first then starting the Prep Tests? Or should I be doing them weekly anyways? I'm a little confused on this, any help appreciated!

0

Why is E the right answer and not A?

In the United States proven oil reserves —the amount of oil considered extractable from known fields—are at the same level as they were ten years ago. Yet over this same period no new oil fields of any consequence have been discovered, and the annual consumption of domestically produced oil has increased.

Which one of the following, if true, best reconciles the discrepancy described above?

A) Over the past decade the annual consumption of imported oil has increased more rapidly than that of domestic oil in the United States.

E) Due to technological advances over the last decade, much oil previously considered unextractable is now considered extractable

Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question."

0

Hi!

I just took this question and answered E first but then changed to D during blind review because it seemed to me that "colonized" was too much of an inference in this answer. Now that I have seen the correction, I still have troubles understanding why D is incorrect. Is E a better answer because it is a better conclusion to the stimulus? How can I approach these tough MSS questions better? #help

Thank you

Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question."

0

A lot of schools list questions such as "have you ever had disciplinary actions/charges brought against you?" Does disciplinary action include inquiries?

Other schools specify that they're asking for "academic disciplinary actions/academic misconduct" so are academic actions included under all things disciplinary or do they differ from disciplinary actions?

I assume no matter the specifics an applicant should either call and ask the admissions office or just err on the side of caution and submit anything they think might apply.

0

On Wednesday, June 28 at 8pm ET, join 7Sage admissions consultant Tajira McCoy for another panel discussion with law school admissions deans from across the country. For this conversation, hear from representatives of Boston College, Emory University, Loyola University Chicago, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the University of Richmond, and the University of San Diego, as they weigh in on various parts of the reapplicant process and common reapplicant questions––should you write new documents? Will retaking the LSAT help? Will applying earlier make a difference? Do I have to specifically address being a reapplicant? We hope to see you there!

Register here: https://7sage.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_akOx91pHQSOyN07230Arqw

Note: if you can't make it the session will be recorded and subsequently posted to our podcast.

3

Hi! This is my first discussion post. I was just wondering if someone would be able to help me better understand the significant gap between my Timed and BR Scores. For example, I recently took one of the PT35+ tests and scored 145 (timed, 35/75) and 165 (BR, 60/75). Does anyone have any tips on how to improve under timed conditions? Whether it's practicing to read faster, minimizing distractions, etc.

1

I am averaging -6 on LR after 7 practice sections (not doing full length tests yet) but consistently miss 1 or 2 of the first 10 questions (i.e., level 1s and 2s) and taking a long time to do so while breezing through the middle 10 questions of the test (then losing more points in the end, partially due to time lost in the beginning and partially because they are hard questions.)

Obviously, I’m planning to incorporate more drilling/reviewing CC to overcome this, but I was wondering if anyone had tips to warmup before a practice section or anything else to avoid brain fog in the beginning of the section. My goal is eventually getting to a 0 to a -1 wrong, but would probably be okay with a -2 depending on how the rest of the test went. Thanks!

1

As the title says, I’m hoping to create a small study group for LSAT prep! I’ll be working on the test all summer (goal is Sep.), and think it’d be great to have a group of peers to encourage and assist each other while studying. In addition to generally helping each other with questions/etc., I’m hoping to, for example, sit in a call with someone while we quietly work on our own stuff. Another example is telling the group what hours you plan to study on a given day/week and then following up afterwards. This can help minimize distractions and gives a sense of accountability, which some people (like me) find really helpful.

If you’re interested in this kind of group, leave a comment and I’ll DM you!

0

Hey 7Sagers,

There's some significant updates LSAC is implementing to their Prep Plus subscription.

Starting July 1, Prep Plus will be transitioning to a new brand name - LawHub Advantage. With this new identity, LSAC will be increasing the cost of their subscription from $99 to $115/year.

However, if you choose to sign up or renew your Prep Plus subscription before July 1 (before it becomes LawHub Advantage), you can do so at LSAC's current price of $99. This pricing will cover you for an additional year: https://www.lsac.org/lawhub

If you have any questions, please feel free to comment on this forum post, and we'll do our best to help!

7

Hi All,

I reviewed for the LSAT using 7Sage last year, didn't get the score I wanted, took a break, and am now studying again.

I'd like to use the beta version of Core Curriculum V2 to review core concepts and bring myself up to speed. However, I understand that the CCv2 is missing lessons and might contain mistakes, albeit very few. I'm wondering what critical LR concepts/lessons from the original Core Curriculum are missing from the V2 beta? After going through CCv2, I want to return to the original curriculum to review LR concepts that were skipped in the beta.

Thanks!

0

Hi! I plan on applying to law schools this September for Fall '24 and had some questions about the FAFSA application. The LSAC advises law school applicants: "If you plan on enrolling in law school at the beginning of the fall term, you can apply for federal financial aid using the FAFSA beginning October 1 of the prior calendar year." As the FAFSA 2022-2023 application closes at the end of this month, am I fine to apply for 2023-2024 when it opens up this October 2023? Or am I misunderstanding and should've applied 2022-2023? I'm having a hard time picturing my timeline as financial aid always worries me.

0

For question 22, I was between choices A & C and I'm having trouble reasoning why the answer is C.

A) These places also have laws about other aspects of bicycle safety.

This seems like it can be the correct answer choice because if these places have other bicycle safety laws, it makes sense that riding on the left vs not riding on the left doesn't impact collisions much, since they have other measures to combat collisions, or whatever. However, since it was outlawed, and assuming that riding on the left leads to more collisions, the collision rate only decreased slightly, since there are other laws protecting bicyclists' safety.

C) Police officers in these places do not enforce regulations that apply to bicyclists.

I understand this is the right answer because while some may have stopped riding on the left since it was outlawed, many did not because the police weren't enforcing this law, therefore, leading to only a little decrease in collisions (the people who decided to follow the law). However, the assumption in this seems (that bicyclists continue riding on the left despite being against the law) to be greater than the assumption made for A (that other safety laws can combat the rate of collisions in general).

Can someone explain?

Thanks

0

I saw a question that said "What is the overall conclusion..". For these overall conclusion questions, is it best to choose the main conclusion, or to also include information from the other stimulus too? Thank you!

0

Hello! I don't remember what practice test I took, but I saw a different type of logic game question. It said something along the lines of "G must be in H only if..". I am only used to the "If G is in H, what must be true?" Does anyone have tips on how to answer the "G must be in H only if.." questions? Thank you!

0

Hello hello, 7Sagers everywhere!

On Wednesday, June 21st at 8:00 PM ET, we'll be hosting a webinar about receiving your official LSAT score. For this webinar, Live Class Teachers Kavita Oza and Bailey Luber will lead a discussion on what to do leading up to and after getting your official LSAT score back. Score Release for the June LSAT will take place just one week later on June 28th, so don't skip out on this prep time that's sure to leave you feeling more confident in your next steps!

⚠️ You’ll have to register for this webinar in advance.

→ Please register for the webinar here: https://7sage.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZIqdeGgrz8uHNUZA9OOyeGonq_be7xJG_5a

⚠️ After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar.

The webinar will be recorded, and we may post it on our site or on YouTube. We may also share the audio on our podcast.

If you want to ask a question, you should connect via a computer instead of calling in. We also recommend that you join the webinar a few minutes early and test your microphone.

Want to learn more about our LSAT Tutoring Program? Schedule a free consultation with this link: https://calendly.com/7sage-tutoring/7sage-tutoring-free-consultation

If you have any questions, please feel free to comment down below! I hope to see you there!

2

Confirm action

Are you sure?