All posts
New post629 posts in the last 30 days
Now that we're a little over a month away from the September LSAT, I'm just curious what everyone is focusing on/how you're hammering out your routines. I'm taking one PT per week and reviewing/drilling/fool proofing in between PTs. I'm a little bit nervous that that won't be enough PTs before the test, but I tend to do better when I do fewer PTs and put more focus on the other aspects of studying.
I am looking for a study partner to discuss some areas that we need help on. For me, I am struggling with assumptions SA, NA, PSA. I would love if anyone is able to help me on this area!
First off, I appreciate any advise and help that you guys are able to provide. I am very stressed at this point because my main goal was to get into the Top 14 law schools. I just graduated with Bachelors this May at the age of 19 with a 3.66 GPA in Criminal Justice and Psychology. I am worried that my GPA isn't good enough for law school, but hopefully with a great LSAT score and a unique personal statement sharing my experiences and graduating so early, I might be able to still get in. Only problem is, I am still scoring around 152-155. I am especially struggling with SA and NA for logical reasoning. I did do some games, but I never got time to foolproof every single game, so I am worried. I have just done the games in the CC and the games on PT as well. I feel like there are people who have foolproofed over 100 games for so long! I am no where close to that. My first test score before the CC was 144. Then, on the other two tests I took after that, I got 150-155. I feel like I should be aiming for the 170, but can I even get that by September? Is that too unrealistic? I am worried about taking the test in November and applying later on because of my GPA. I really want to go to the Top 14 though, so I don't know if I should just sit this cycle out, practice until June 2019, then go to Law School 2020. I just don't want it that I wait out another year and end up looking bad on applications that "hey what did you even do for two years after graduation?" Plus, I don't know if I should just go to a lower ranking school, but I don't want to. I was really set on the Top 14 and I am looking for any advice. I know that some schools including Columbia, Washington-St Louis, GeorgeTown, and others are accepting the GRE. Should I just take the GRE instead of LSAT and see what happens? I am just so overwhelmed right now.
I just finished going over a warm up piece from LG PT46 and had a bit of a realization during BR. I commented at the link below and I would absolutely love to know what other 7Sagers think about this added step going onto each LG game.
https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-46-section-4-game-2/
It's sorry it's so long. Thank you!!
I was wondering how others have taken this course or the best way to go about it. Does it make sense to just do the entire syllabus in order and then PT's?
To those who consistently score well in RC, do you usually have significant time remaining at the end like in LG or LR?
Hello everyone!
I've taken about 15 PT's now, and am still consistently missing flaw/strengthen/weaken problems—basically the questions that force me to think outside of the box. When I go over questions I got wrong, the correct answer always makes sense, yet when test-taking I struggle with coming up with those types of answers myself. Has anyone else had this problem? Do you have any recommendations for working on this type of thinking and practicing it? I've gone over the CC a couple of times now for these types of questions, but it never seems to stick...
Hey everybody!
I had this idea for RC that I wanted to run by the community and get some input. After all is said and done, the gist of the RC is to actively read so that after every sentence, you are constantly building a puzzle and applying it back on the previously read sentences. At the end of the day, it isn't so simple to keep all that new info neatly filed away in your brain. A powerful tool that is missing here is review. The thing about reviewing is that you need downtime in between the material studied and the actual review for your brain to settle. Just skimming over the selection real quick after the initial read won't do it. So I was thinking, what if you read all four paragraphs in succession and then return to the first selection, skimming it in about two minutes and then doing the questions on it and continuing for the rest of the selections? I have tried it twice. Both times I finished by the skin of my teeth (not much improvement from doing the questions right after an initial read). However, I answered most questions more confidently and quickly than before although my overall score didn't improve much. Has anybody been doing it this way? I figured I could improve in this strategy but I'm still not convinced it is the best way.
I'm having a hard time brainstorming assumptions for SA, PSA, weaken and strengthen questions. Sometimes when I draw out the premises and conclusion and look for the missing assumption, I end up with something that's either not in the AC. It's been interfering with how well I can do on these questions. I've practiced quite a lot, but does anyone have any tips on how to be smart about working on this? Thanks!
Does anyone have a "cheat sheet" for how to approach different question types? ex. main point is to find conclusion then look for answer. same idea but for all the different question types
Hello all,
Just curious about something. When you record yourself, do you keep the video footage after? I record everything in excel spreadsheets for all sections so I'm wondering if it's worth keeping the files since footage of one PT is around 20 gigs. I'm aware I could move it to external harddrive but do people actually rewatch old footage?
Thanks in advance!
I saw that the new trainer has a study guide that is catered to the most recent preptests. I have the 2015 version of the book and would like to know if there are any updates or changes to the current edition.
September'18 Study Group | Blind Review PT 79 | Friday, August 10th | 7:30 PM EST
Hey everyone! For those that are unaware, there is going to be an AMA (Ask me Anything) on Thursday, August 9th 9:00 PM ET with JY and David Busis. That will probably conflict with our review session. So! If you plan on joining the group for the review session of PT 79, please vote on whether you would like to start our session early on Thursday (6:30 PM ET) or would like to have our session on Friday, August 10th instead.
Edit: As per the vote, our meeting will be Friday, August 10 7pm EST (Yay democracy)
Also, if you are interested in attending the AMA here is the link, you have to register beforehand so please be sure to do so :) https://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/17112/ama-webinar-with-david-and-j-y-thursday-aug-9-9-p-m-et
Also! When you join the call, please be sure to have your first name and your 7sage handle in brackets so it's easy to keep track
If you are done the curriculum or almost done the curriculum, join us when you can. We welcome people in all stages of prep. The point of the group is to get your lsat nerd on with other like-minded people and make the process more fun. Expand your thinking and learning by interacting with others! For my fellow shy-people, everyone is going to be focused on their own answers/questions that I guarantee you they will not be judging you based on mispronounced words, reading-speed, etc. It's all for fun!
Note: Take the PT under timed conditions; BR to the best of your abilities; join us for all or part of the call! For the purposes of the group please don't check the answers beforehand. If you happen to know the answer, keep it to yourself, and win the argument using your reasoning. Also, please don't go "so I know the answer is C but I don't know why B is wrong?" as the purpose is so that we all collaborate on improving our reasoning skills.
Enter the questions you wish to go over on the spreadsheet below! Write your name beside the question(s) you wish to cover, if the question(s) you want to cover are already marked by someone else, add your name! :) The more discussion, the merrier.
Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18ZoI9Nu-8SmhPh_MBpz8W6hEcDV1CyhZJVPKDQ7s08E/edit?usp=sharing
Tentative Schedule: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=keets993@gmail.com&ctz=America/Toronto
September 18 Study Group
Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone.
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/879623125
You can also dial in using your phone.
United States: +1 (224) 501-3412
Access Code: 879-623-125
Joining from a video-conferencing room or system?
Dial: 67.217.95.2##879623125
Cisco devices: 879623125@67.217.95.2
First GoToMeeting? Let's do a quick system check: https://link.gotomeeting.com/system-check
Note: I will not be sharing my screen so please have the material in front of you.
I had taken the Princeton review course last fall in preparation for the December 2017 exam , which I found to be the least helpful and disappointingly scored a 147. I took it again in February and got the same score. Has anyone been in a similar situation and have any tips/ suggestions on how they improved?
Scoring around 157, what are the chances of improving to 163ish in 1 month, should i push exam date?
i take the lsat in September, I am scoring around 157 in practice testing, what are the chances of scoring in the mid 160's in 1 more month. I study about 10 hours a week and am planing on pushing that to15-20 for this last month. My GPA is currently a 3.83 and really want to get into UC Berkeley. Given this, would any of you recommend changing my test date to November?
PS. does anyone know if being Latino helps in law school admissions, Thank you
I'm sure it varies from person to person. I ask because I'll be able to get through about 30 PTs before I take the March 2019 LSAT and am curious if I would be cheating myself by not doing more
I am wondering whether I should be drilling games by using the Powerscore logic games bible because I did buy it before, or whether I should just continue taking PTs? If I get games wrong, then I can see what I got wrong and try to watch the videos on it? What's the best idea because I am taking the test in September?
Hi guys, just a quick question. When I'm drilling for logic games (doing timed sections in the bundle), is it a big deal not to be able to get it on the first try? I find untimed, I can do them really well (accuracy wise) but I only struggle with timing. Once I watch some of the videos or even attempt the set again I am able to do much better. The reason I'm asking is because obviously you only get one chance on test day so I just wanted to see the general opinion on this topic is
Thanks guys
I go from -0 to -5 on the hardest passages, independent of subject matter. I literally have no idea why any of these variations happen. I can usually BR them -0 or -1. Ugh help me.
https://i.pinimg.com/736x/1d/70/c7/1d70c7ba7719ddf0c422518c0b2210e0--french-lessons-french-class.jpg
^Me while I'm reading
Applying this September and faced with the choice of EDying to CLS or not.
I would like to hear your thoughts on (1) whether ED to CLS is worth the cost of revoking opportunity for HYS and (2) if there is a ED 'bump'.
Here's my background:
I'm a URM (Hispanic); top undergrad university 3,82 gpa; I speak several languages including Mandarin and Spanish; work experience in federal gov't and in law. Great LORs.
My December LSAT is 162 – but i'm retaking in Sep because that was 10 point below my median lsat score. I'm confident that I can score in the 96-8%'tile this September.
Of course HYS would be great, but if I'm pragmatic about admissions (eg. i'm below median LSAT and GPA) I think I have a exceedingly low chance of getting in. The next best thing is CLS, and I'm above their 75 percentile for GPA. So to boost whatever chance I have for CLS, I am seriously considering EDying this fall.
Is this smart? What are my chances at CLS? Anything that I'm not considering?
The other school I'm considering are Chicago, NYU and Berk. But I would prefer CLS to them and think I have a decent shot.
This is probably a silly question but...
When I go to click on the"PT X-- all sections printable" button on any given PT I get a gray screen. I'm using Google Chrome on my Mac, and have allowed Flash player to run on 7Sage. However, each time I click on the "all sections printable" button, I get a notification saying that Flash was blocked (even though I've allowed it). I think I cannot see the PT and/or print because of something with Flash. Is there anyone who has experienced this and could possibly provide some insight?
Thanks!
Hello, I'm wondering if anyone has had experiences with LSAT tutoring. How many tutoring hours did you purchase? Did you have any issues with learning different strategies (from what 7Sage teaches)? What about materials? Did you have to purchase additional materials that your tutor preferred?
I really wish 7Sage offered this service (unless they do and I I've totally missed it).
Thanks in advance.
I was looking down at the later weeks on my study schedule and it shows to take about 4 PTs a week. How would you guys recommend going about this with BR and the Q bank? Should I do a PT every other day and do the BR and Q bank, for Qs that I need more practice with, on the other days?
hey all
so i've heard of some ppl who do this but just wanted to get everyone's broader feedback. i know many ppl disagree with looking at the questions first before reading the RC passage.
but how is this strategy?
first briefly scan the questions, see which questions have specific line references, and then go back to the passage and just note (draw a star/squiggly or something) next to those line references.
then read the passage, but when you come across a part of the passage that you previously noted (and that will be tested on a question), read that part a little bit more carefully/intentionally.
that way you'll be a little more prepared when you see that question after you finish reading the passage.
what do ppl think of this strategy? and advice or thoughts? thanks.