Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
MTreigys
About
- Username
- MTreigys
- Joined
- Visits
- 126
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
I would be interested. Taking it in September.
-
@"mikalyn.greenzweig" said: @MTreigys Same! I had 2 RC sections and thought both did a good job at keeping my attention. Some of the best RC I've seen in a while. the section on the swamps was the only passage that really had me second guess…
-
I found the RC pretty fun to read for the most part in all honesty. Hope for the same next test lol.
-
@ELPISTOLERO9 said: Ok y’all, like the rest I had to wait for over an hour. My situation was even worse because I got cleared just to get told to exit and log back in. Then…. Yes you guessed it I had to wait even more. Nonetheless, during that…
-
I would strongly recommend reading 7sage's 21 argument flaws just before the test too, in order to get a nice refresher.
-
@"sorour.a.j79" said: @addison101220 said: A strategy that I just learned about is to drill yourself by doing the first 10-15 questions in a LR section as quickly as you can, if you're looking to increase your time. Perhaps try doi…
-
There definitely is some difference from what I've found. For example, I used to almost never see MC questions where the last sentence is the MC, though now I regularly treat it as though it's a possibility.
-
Two points I think: 1. Both (high and low cholesterol) can weaken artery walls, though the extent can greatly differ. 2. Do we really need high cholesterol to prevent this all the time? Can it not sometimes lead to it? What if it's super super sup…
-
I wouldn't focus on this too much as it just adds another element you need not worry about. I've had some 1-2 star passages that I found pretty challenging, while some 5-star passages on the same set I found rather easy and was surprised when I saw …
-
When I first finished the cc properly (I took a PT or two without looking at RC, big mistake lol) I went from a diagnostic of 148 (though this should have been a bit lower since I practiced LG a bit before this) to 162, with my peak being at 169 on …
-
@"Matt Sorr" said: I think it's wise to use LawHub some before your actual test. Luckily, LawHub's interface is similar to 7Sage's, so it probably won't take you long to (if any time at all) to adjust. Still, the interface is slightly differen…
-
This is definitely a tricky question upon my first look. AC E seems to latch onto an assumption in the official's argument while also making use of the term "murder" in an exact sense. The official is essentially saying that despite the number going…
-
Yeah, there is some variance with regard to difficulty and sometimes the content of certain passages may just be more relatable to you. I had a run of PTs where there were seemingly many argument part questions, which I find to be one of my weaker q…
-
Typically in LR what you want to do is show that the premises given in support of a conclusion are not entirely sufficient in proving that conclusion, though it doesn't necessarily have to make the possibility of the conclusion being right gone. Tak…
-
I would just try to accept the fact that you're not gonna get every question right 99% of the time, and know that you don't necessarily have to be perfect in every time management aspect, as you can't really know what the ideal time for each questio…