Has anyone heard of/use a reading strategy where you don't read the question stems in LR and simply figure out the question type via stimulus? If so, is it effective?
I had LR-RC-LR-LR-LG. For those with the same set-up, have we been able to guess which LR was experimental? Was the one about mate/paraguay in the first section?
... some advice on improving my LR scores.
I' ... about my scores on LR. I started studying with ... few PTs but my LR scores are barely improving ... the Trainer and 7Sage for LR, would you recommend 7Sage ... 7Sage teach different methods for LR that can help me? ...
... I am very strong in LR sections and I almost always ... guess I understand the question stem well but I feel as ... these questions I read the stem first, identify conclusion and support ...
... start a page within our LR discussion category similar to Manhattan ... 's LR explanations page, or do you ... doens't include all the LR questions and explanations, so if ... if that's actually an LR section). Thoughts? Of course, if ...
... , and according to the score sheet, I got a 157 actual ... answers and got RC -7, LR -15, LG -6 for 73 ... BR, it was RC -5, LR -13, LG -1 for 82 ...
HI Folks!
I am looking for the previous post(s) that had a compilation of the hardest passages.
I am especially looking for hardest RC and LR.
Thanks a lot!