LSAT 113 – Section 2 – Question 04

Sign up to star your favorites LSAT 113 - Section 2 - Question 04

June 2002

You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.

Target time: 0:41

This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds

Question QuickView	Type	Tags	Answer Choices	Curve This gives you an idea of how this question is “curved”— in other words, what level of scorer is likely to get this question right. It shows a model of scaled LSAT score vs probability of getting the question correct. It is based on student test results for each question. The gray bar extends from the score for a 25% chance, to the score for a 75% chance of getting the question correct. The black line in the middle is the score for a 50% chance of getting the question correct. The percentage at the right is the expected chance of someone with the same score as you on that PrepTest getting that question correct	Question Difficulty	Psg/Game/S Difficulty	Explanation

Question QuickView	Type	Tags	Answer Choices	Curve This gives you an idea of how this question is “curved”— in other words, what level of scorer is likely to get this question right. It shows a model of scaled LSAT score vs probability of getting the question correct. It is based on student test results for each question. The gray bar extends from the score for a 25% chance, to the score for a 75% chance of getting the question correct. The black line in the middle is the score for a 50% chance of getting the question correct. The percentage at the right is the expected chance of someone with the same score as you on that PrepTest getting that question correct	Question Difficulty	Psg/Game/S Difficulty	Explanation
PT113 S2 Q04	+LR	Weaken +Weak Link Assumption +LinkA	A 1% 149 B 84% 160 C 9% 153 D 1% 153 E 6% 153	127 139 151	+Easier	147.106 +SubsectionMedium

Showing 1 to 1 of 1 entries

First Previous1Next Last

J.Y.’s explanation

You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.

Compared to us, people who lived a century ago had very few diversions to amuse them. Therefore, they likely read much more than we do today.

Summarize Argument

The author concludes that people who lived a century ago probably read a lot more than we read today. As support for this theory, the author cites the fact that those who lived a century ago had very few diversions to amuse them.

Notable Assumptions

The author is assuming that a lack of diversions would lead to people choosing to read more, as opposed to some other activity that could provide amusement. The author is also assuming that enough people were literate a century ago to read “much more” than people read today. Additionally, the author is assuming that people had enough free time to read at a similar level to the amount of time that people spend reading today.

Many of the books published a century ago were of low literary quality.

Just because books are of low literary quality does not mean that people won’t be reading them. Also, (A) does not compare literary quality of books a century ago with literary quality of books today. It could be that many books published today are also of low literary quality.

On average, people who lived a century ago had considerably less leisure time than we do today.

(B) gives a reason that, even though people a century ago had fewer sources of diversion, they may not have read much more than we do today. Even if people today have more options for diversion, if we have more time to fill, we could be reading more than people a century ago.

The number of books sold today is larger than it was a century ago.

More total book sales does not necessarily indicate more time spent reading per capita. Also, the population today is much higher than it was a century ago, which would account for the increase in book sales without an increase in time that people spend reading.

On the average, books today cost slightly less in relation to other goods than they did a century ago.

The argument connects available diversions to time spent reading, so book cost is out of the scope of the argument. Also, (D) compares book costs with the cost of goods in general, not the cost of other sources of amusement. Books could have been a cheap source of amusement.

One of the popular diversions of a century ago was horse racing.

The author only claims that there were fewer diversions a century ago, not that reading was the only diversion. Also, (E) does not make a comparison between conditions a century ago and conditions today.

LSAT 113 – Section 2 – Question 04

Sign up to star your favorites LSAT 113 - Section 2 - Question 04

You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.

J.Y.’s explanation

You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.

Take PrepTest

Review Results

LSAT PrepTest 113 Explanations

Section 1 - Reading Comprehension

Section 2 - Logical Reasoning

Section 3 - Logical Reasoning

Section 4 - Logical Reasoning

Leave a Reply Cancel