I'm so glad that I understand 7sage curriculum. I'm starting to understand the concepts of LR and RC! I think I will reach my potential score for the Feb test!
Thank you 7Sagers !
36 posts in the last 30 days
I'm so glad that I understand 7sage curriculum. I'm starting to understand the concepts of LR and RC! I think I will reach my potential score for the Feb test!
Thank you 7Sagers !
Hi everyone,
A little background: I first started studying in September 2017 in order to take the exam in December of that year. I had a pretty good understanding of the logic games and they seem to be the only section that I have been consistently improving in. I decided to withdraw from the exam, however, for two reasons. First, I got caught up with school work and exams, and second, I was missing so many questions in LR and did not know how to come up with a proper technique for RC (I am a very slow reader and it takes me a couple times to go over a paragraph to be able to fully understand it, and it doesn't help that tend to get distracted easily).
I then decided to sign up for the February 2018 exam. I took my very first diagnostic in late December after I finished my finals, where I got a 143. Since then, I started studying for 12-15 hours a day from my PowerScore bibles and watching 7Sage videos. I was devoting most of my time to LR as it is my absolute worst section. I did a bunch of drills from PT 7 to 35 and was getting about 70% of them right.
A few days ago, however, I took a timed PT to see if I was making any improvements under testing conditions. I ended up getting a 142. I don't understand how I spent so much time studying only to end up with a score that was just as bad as my diagnostic. Anyway, I panicked and decided to withdraw from the February exam as it was only 2 weeks away at that point and I still was not doing well. Not even close.
So, right now I have no idea how to approach the LR and RC sections. How do I improve? I feel like no matter how many drills I do, there's no progress. Help!
In full disclosure, I took PowerScore's course 3 years ago, though I didn't pay attention or complete assignments as I wasn't yet sold on law school. Two weeks ago I took PT 62 as a diagnostic (I had already taken June 2007), and scored a 163 (-5 rc, -4 lr, -8 lg, -9 lr).
Today, after going through 7Sage for one week (only up through their basic logic core curriculum, so no games or rc or advanced lr), I decided to blind review my PT 62. Admittedly, I only went back and wrote down all questions I got wrong (not the answer I selected originally). Then I took that piece of paper with the section and numbers I had gotten wrong and redid the problems. I ended up with a 174 (-2 rc, -3 lr, -0 lg, -3 lr).
If I continue to study hard (about 20 hours per week, ~20-25 full timed PTs), does it seem feasible that I could take the June LSAT and score a 169+? After this blind review, part of me wants to aim for scoring a 172+ on the LSAT, since I was able to understand the concepts in my quasi-blind review. It seems like I just need to work on solidifying concepts strongly so that I can work at a more diligent pace while doing PTs. Is that crazy out of reach? Thoughts? How do you manage expectations between blind review and timed tests?
My feeling is that I would like to see my timed tests and blind review margin shrink over time (ideally with timed and br growing in score).
Hello- I would really appreciate some advice!
Some background info:-
My questions:-
I'd really, really appreciate any help! Thanks!
7Sagers,
On Wednesday, January 17, at 9 p.m. ET, I’ll host an admissions webinar about what you can do after you send in your law school application. At the end of my presentation, I’ll answer your questions.
:cookie: We’ll give one webinar attendee a free critique of a personal statement, résumé, LOCI, or any other document.
:warning: You’ll have to register for this webinar in advance.
→ Please register for the webinar (Jan 17, 2017 @ 9:00 p.m. ET) here: https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/1126655659329187330?source=Discussion+Forum.
After registering, you’ll receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar.
Hope to see you there!
.
I quickly went thru the CC last year over the summer before my senior year of undergrad and did an awful job at it. Didnt take it seriously, didn’t really take notes, skipped RC, skipped a lot of the beginning which I thought was unnecessary and basic like of course I know premise/conclusion.
I stopped studying in November 2017 to take a “break” and never really went back to it.
Now I’m really taking my time with it and realizing how many nuances there are in just identifying premise/conclusion.
I think my diagnostic likely be similar to my first diagnostic and it will be discouraging and stressful. if there is any sort of benefit I’ll take it.
Hi everyone!
I'm pretty much set on beginning my LSAT studying using 7sage - yay! I'm hoping to take the test in either September or November. However, work will be very busy for the next ~4 months, so I'll have less time to study during the first half of the year as compared to the second half of the year.
How much time should be dedicated to each course option? (Does it even make sense for me to ask this question? I don't know how the courses work.) I know they allow for a "personalized schedule," but I imagine that a general amount of time should be dedicated to studying with course per week/month.
Essentially, I'd like to figure out whether to save the 7Sage course for later this year when I'll have more capacity.
Thank you kindly!
Some ideas may be but not limited to scholarships, location, course variety and/or student life. Mines are:
Kaplan is offering free LSAT prep courses online right now.
Any other free LSAT prep offered?
Can someone tell me the proper way to blind review. I seem to be doing it wrong
Hi all! First post on here. So.... I took the December 2017 LSAT. It was a disaster for me. I had been self studying since around March of 2017 and took a Blueprint course over the summer with the plan to take the September LSAT. However, I postponed because my PTs had been getting worse leading up to September, so I thought I needed more time. My initial timed diagnostic PT was 159, and I had been PTing consistently in the low to mid 160s. I scored a 145 on the December LSAT... It was tragic. I couldn't sleep the night before. I just didn't think I would score as low as I did and I honestly have no idea what happened that day. I truly had to rethink if I had what it takes for law school. I was all set to apply this cycle; obviously with such a low score I had to postpone for a year. SO, I've been taking the last few months off from anything LSAT related and now I think I'm ready to start studying again. I'm signed up for the June test.
Obviously, I need to really start from the beginning and go through all the fundamentals to get it down again. I used the LSAT Trainer, Blueprint classroom course and 7sage for games. I had done PT 42 - 78. How would I go about retaking PT's? Erase all my work and try again? I also work full-time, so I cannot study more than a few hours or so a day with the exception of the weekend. My boss actually paid for my Blueprint course, and I feel awful that I did not do well. Should I just use the material that I have - re-read LSAT trainer / utilize materials from Blueprint and go from there? Should I purchase the 7sage course?
Any recommendations from whoever has been in a similar situation would be great. Thanks all!
I am curious towards your approach on ordering and structuring the course content.
Did you follow the syllabus and do it chronologically?
Or did you jump between the sections and PT’s?
Did you put heavy emphasis on learning fundamentals of lawgic?
Or jump straight into drilling problem sets?
How many days a week did you study and for how long?
What was something that you personally thought of or did that helped information stick?
In hindsight, were there any weaknesses in your study habits/style?
You get the drift..
Regards,
Dalton
Do law schools look at your highest LSAT score or do they combine all of them together and look at the average?
An interesting article about memory and learning:
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/01/what-was-this-article-about-again/551603/
Plan accordingly with your studies. Take the time to layer knowledge, circle back frequently, and consume consciously.
So I've been admitted and got my financial aid award letter and it was shocking to say the least. They are going to let me take the LSAT again and if I score higher I can report that score and have my scholarship increased with the possibility of a full ride.
I took the LSAT in sept and got a 149. I prepped hard and totally bombed my best section LR. I went -3/5 on the other sections and averaged a 156 on prep tests.
my question is:
Where do I even begin?
Hi all, is there a way to print out questions from the QBbank? I would like to start drilling LR questions and find it easier to do them on actual paper so I can take notes and underline what is important to retain. Thanks.
Hi everyone,
I bubble my answer immediately after I completed a question, but I started to doubt whether this is a efficient way or not.
What are you guys' strategies on bubbling?
Thanks.
I completed the CC about a year ago and I took a while off due to some military obligations and now I'm gearing towards taking the June LSAT. I've begun to fool proof the LG and am wondering what should I do to improve RC and LR? Do I do the CC again or should I focus on the questions types I struggle with?
My diagnostic test was a 144, I've improved to a 156 but that is doing the test untimed. I average -12 LR -12 RC and -11LG. I'm seeing some improvement so far by fool proofing the LG but don't want to neglect the other sections that I also need to improve dramatically on.
Hey There is this question in one of the quizzes and we are supposed to negate it:
Drug-related crime is not as serious a problem for the city as the mayor claims it is.
I read it as “all” drug related crime is not as serious a problem for the city as the mayor claims it is.
So wouldn’t this be the negation: Some drug related crime is as serious as the mayor claims it is or more?
This is the answer that was written for the quiz:
It’s not the case that drug-related crime is not as serious of a problem for the city as the mayor claims it is.
Drug-related crime is just as serious of a problem for the city as the mayor claims it is, or it is more serious. (Which is the same thing as saying – some drug related crime is as serious of a problem for the city as the mayor claims it is)
Anyone?
Hi!
Is there any way to pre-download the videos through the 7Sage mobile app? This way you could watch them should you use public transit to work (I live in NYC and have a 45 minute subway commute where I could be easily focusing on videos; thats 1.5 hours more study time per day)?
If not, how could we go about suggesting such an app development to the creators? Anyone else want this feature, if it doesn't already exist?
Can anyone who is familiar with the February tests confirm that every single non-experimental question on the February test have been previously tested on other test takers (through experimental sections on their tests or outside-of-us administered tests, etc)? I heard that February tests have unusual questions so I was wondering. Maybe people mistakenly feel like the content is unusual only because they don't get to see which questions they got wrong??
Hi- Cannot seem to grasp this question type. Any study advice or help?
Hey guys, a 7Sager asked a question and I thought you guys could help out! Here it is:
I have about 10 fresh PTs left and I'm registered for the February test, and was wondering if it would be advisable for me to leave all of them untouched for the June test or to go through only the LG sections before the Feb test? I heard there are a lot of curveballs/weird games for the late 70s tests which I haven't solved yet, and so I thought it would be a good idea to get as much exposure to them.
And in the meanwhile, would it be best for me to re-take older PTs that I've forgotten and hardcore blind review like we did together?
Hi,
I take like hours to review questions that I got it wrong... I go through every answers and try to figure it out why each is wrong or right...
I've noticed if I review like 10 questions.. I spend almost an hour... sometimes more..
Am I the only one who's taking this long? Is this normal?