@arieatsoranges i use it as a baseline loosely so i can see if anything pops up with it in the ACs and do POE

@Bruh same, i skip through if something else comes up but once he went over the one that matched my prediction i continue on. The over explaining kinda confuses me

@Galaw2027! For me and my thought process but putting it out if anyone wants to chime in.

1. E is right bc based off the last sentence, if you're conflicts are based on ideology then you are unwilling to compromise. Based off the first sentence, only people who are willing to compromise should undergo mediation. Together, those who are not willing to compromise (conflicts based on ideology) shouldn't undergo mediation.

2. I was stuck between A and C but took out C bc politicians could possibly be censured for other reasons. We don't know. A ultimately bc the prominent politicians were in a serious scandal, they can't be reelected or avoid censure. We already they won't be reelected, just need that other part they mentioned in the first sentence.

3. E because "atleast some" which are those with A lipids with no benefits to diet, put them more at risk even after the low fat diet since they (type a volunteers) shifted to B type profiles based off last sentence.

4. Stuck between B and D. struck out D bc if we rearrange the sentence, violence is distinct ("different") from the self expression sufficient for survival under normal circumstances. D is something we can agree with bc violence is not needed to survive in normal circumstances. B ultimately bc this is something we just don't know bc the only form of aggression mentioned is violence.

5. I was stuck between A and E. Not A bc we don't know anything about city with worst air pop. today. Just that cities from 30 years ago now have better air. E felt like it was one of those too easy to be right. it's generally stating something that they mention. We don't have a one off or specific thing to look into.

3/5 -> BR 5/5

Did diagramming mess anyone else’s brain up? I used to get these a little more intuitively. Not sure how to go back to how I use to think of these questions lol

@ChristinaCorbo a video would help so much bc I got confused one what was happening in the text

Okay maybe this is working lol not fully down on the concepts of when they apply but you can kinda cross out what you know won’t apply and juggle between 2-3 choices then down to 2. 3/3 (:

Kind of wish the explanation of the question was more intuitive than math-like. I had to stop once the diagramming started because it confused me.

Based off the video explanation on #3, is there a way to make it not feel like logic games and a way to simplify by words why A would be correct? I got it on the blind review after reading carefully without the diagramming and math feeling breakdown.

im so lost lol again

@mks i thinks its alot to remember and when to apply for me and im getting some right but others i want to cry bc idk whats going on

5/5 shocked bc some confused me but happy I didn’t switch my answers after my first choices

4/5, #3 got me

5/5 woohoo!

6/7 but #4 got me