13/13!!! no BR needed!

do we actually take low resolution notes? Like on a piece of paper I guess? or is it just mental notes?

@arianacardwell Im wondering the same.

Was not expecting a 5/5! went 54s over on #2, and 29s over on #3; everything else was done on time tho!!!

I got it right but was hesitant because I disagreed with what B was saying lol.

@deji just you.

I was on a role with NA until this one. Fell for the trap and selected D. Got it right on BR. uuuugh!

@Amelia_D It kind of does guarantee it though. There's a correlation between A (snoring) and B (throat damage). Stimulus is arguing that A caused B. Answer E says that B didn't cause A. So If B didn't cause A, then A must have caused B. This is a strengthen question, not a mbt but I see what you're saying.

@catintheLSAT James is a middle child.

@JAndonian16 @ 3.14 this is indeed next level fuckery.

What the heck is this? and only a level 3!

@ColinBoyd People like sharing their good results. Like me, 4/5 then 5/5 on BR :)

I misread the stimulus cuz I am a dingus. Noticed the two rules, didn't think both rules needed to be satisfied.

almost picked C, my gut said A. Not sure if that is the right way to do these tho lol

@AdeenaRashid I got 2/5 then 3/5 for blind review. Wanted more practice, pressed take another drill. Gave me way easier questions and I got 5/5.

pretty sure i've seen this question before on 7sage

@TeklaCo well after sleeping on it for a week i've concluded I must have misunderstood the question. Pest experts recommend sprays over zappers. B is in support of zappers which wouldn't support the pest experts recommendations. E is definitely the answer.

Finally seeing improvements!

Why are level 3s easy but level 4s are significantly harder :/

If you chose C, I can definitely see why. I liked C and D and thought D was a better fit.

@jennawiese I mean, how would you not know?

@LSATKilla87 They are the same thing. All theses questions basically follow this format.

This one took me a minute. If you're struggling, this might help:

the stimulus says there is a correlation between snoring and throat damage then claims the snoring caused the damage/abnormalities in the conclusion. Alternatively, you could argue that maybe the damage was caused by the snoring. Then E says damage/abnormalities didn't cause the snoring; so then snoring must have caused the damage/abnormalities.

@SusanLeifker same bro. Got it wrong, then during the blind review was like, "im a dingus"

@Bruh FYI its not B. If you stopped watching when he claimed its B, you missed out on why its not B!