- Joined
- Jun 2026
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
Discussions
Wow I got it correct and that too 30 seconds under target timing. This question just reminded me of my friends long term friendship with an older lady (their age gap is 40 years old) & they bonded over botany & nature. Sometimes random life experiences get you to get an answer correct haha
I've learned that the right answer will sound a lil boring more often than not in SA questions..
Hi! Wondering if anyone that works FT would like to be in a study group together? It can feel so isolating to do this by yourself and I'm wondering if others would like to connect.
@flaviaflobato65 the powerscore book also mentions this; basically to find a weak spot in the stem and see if any answer choices help add to it.
is it humanly possible to solve causal argument questions in less than 1:30?
@akelly9 the lsat made me realize how I can get a 5/5 when im able to focus, but 0/5 when my focus is hazy & the 0s aren't a true testament of my ability. I just need to "reset" like u said and pick a time when I feel sharper. If this is how u feel, I echo it for sure.
@lsat.footpad065 I did the questions in the powerscore book and that was helpful!
@FlorenceYang are you still on foundations or were you just drilling?
2/5 - the first question was SO damn difficult, I spent like 20 mins on it. Timing on others was ok, but damn did the first one trip me up.
I mapped the chain out perfectly but idk what prompted me to pick the wrong answer despite that. Ugh.
4/5 phew. Big improvement for me from my 1s and 2s out of 5. Since I am early on, I am giving myself a lot of time to work through these - as much as I need bc I am early on and I care more about reinforcing the concepts. Getting timing right will come later in my journey.
@HenryLehmann your way of thinking almost adds a modifier, which makes it so much easier to follow. Thanks!
For those unable to get q5, I asked Sage AI and I really liked it's response:
Let's break down Question 5 from the Comparatives 2 lesson!
This one is a bit tricky because one of the things being compared is actually "invisible" in the sentence.
The Sentence: "At least 59 percent of households maintained a lower indoor temperature than they had been accustomed to maintain on very cold days."
1. Things being compared: What households do now vs. what they used to do(what they were "accustomed to"). The word "now" isn't explicitly written in the sentence, but it's implied. The sentence is comparing their current habit ("maintained") to their past habit ("had been accustomed to").
2. Quality being compared: Which one is a lower indoor temperature.
3. The "Winner": What they do now. In this comparison, their current temperature is the one that gets the label of being "lower."
What about the rest of the sentence? The phrase "At least 59 percent of households" at the beginning just tells us who this comparison applies to. The phrase "on very cold days" at the end just sets the scene. It means we are specifically comparing the temperature they keep now on freezing days to the temperature they used to keep on freezing days.
The big takeaway here is that the LSAT will sometimes compare something explicitly stated to something implied. When a sentence compares a past habit to a current action, you have to use those context clues to spot the "invisible" side of the comparison!
3/5, got the first two wrong. they really tripped me up bc they ask about the flaw in the argument / what the argument overlooks, which is hard to decipher bc I feel I only know how to find an answer based on what is already given in the text of the question..
2/3 - the second question tripped me up, I knew it'd be A or E but I picked A
@CherryMayDelaCruz is there any way I can top up my limit? also, this subscription is so expensive as it is and im willing to pay a bit more for top up bc it really helps me, but I wish there was more usage available, especially bc ive spent so much money on 7sage as it is..