Probs gna make a reference in the portfolio.
But in all seriousness, I'm addicted.
268 posts in the last 30 days
Probs gna make a reference in the portfolio.
But in all seriousness, I'm addicted.
http://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-28-section-1-question-26/
I chose D but the answer is E. I still don't understand why E is an answer.
If planes were first equipped with low-power circuitry "at about the same time" as portable electric devices got popular, can it be strengthening the stimulus?
Being at the "same time" made me think there're no other possibilities which could weaken the stimulus.
Can anyone explain why D can't be an answer and E can?
Thanks!
I really don't understand why C can't be an answer.
McKinley said the drug will have various effects on the patients' bodies. But he also said it will make us aware of "whether the patients are getting the drugs or a placebo" (Does it mean McKinley thought the placebo will produce no effects just like answer choice C?). So that's why I thought Engle said Mckinley assumed what the outcome of the study will be since McKinley said various effects of the drug AND whether the patients are getting the drugs or a placebo.
So can C be an answer?
Can anyone explain me why C can't be an answer and D is better?
Thanks!
Can you believe we're already in week 4 of our BR's of Summer?
Please note, we will NOT be having a call on Saturday, July 4th because America.
Wednesday, July 1st at 8pm EST: PT51
Our basins of attraction were thoroughly riddled on Saturday, so let's move right along.
Friday, July 3rd at 8pm EST: PT69
For those of us who want to be able to retake and/or drill from tests up to PT71, we will have Friday sessions to BR those later tests. This is likely to be a smaller group but open to anyone.
Note on the Friday group: If you want to join, let me know on Skype (nikkers625) and I will add you to this one—all are welcome, some are willing. Most are trying to make valid inferences and/or diagramming these sentences in their heads right now. #so-meta
NO GROUP on July 4th
Here's what I'll be doing on LSATurday evening:
Note on all groups
When some equals 100%, why wouldn't the counter positive be valid?
http://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-49-section-2-question-11/
While the right answer choice is very clear to me, it would be great if someone coule help me to clarify the reasoning structure for both the stimulus and answer choice (B)?
My Breakdown:
Stimulus:
Aerobic exercise & Women---correlates--- higher HDLs
Aerobic exercise & Women---correlates--- lower risk of Heart Disease& Stroke
--------------------
higher HDLs --cause--> lower risk of Heart Disease& Stroke
This reasoning seems to be making the correlation-causation error. However, can we rightfully assume since A correlates with both B and C , that B correlates with C?
*My intuition would say NO, because A most B, A most C, only implies B some C.
Similarly,
1. In the answer choice (B), the strengthening seems to rely on the same logic that Lower level of HDLs (absence of cause) correlates with higher risk of Heart Disease& Stroke (absence of effect) because both correlates with overweight.
2. some suggests the idea of overweight as the strengthener for Aerobic exercise.They reason that correlation between AE and lower risk HD&S is strengthened because Overweight (absence of Aerobic exercise) correlates with higher risk of HD&S (absence of lower risk HD&S). But first can we assume that overweight generally implies absence of aerobic exercise? and second if the emphasis is on overweight, this answer choice would seem like a premise booster.
.
removed by admin: please dont talk about the recent LSAT's questions.
So I'm looking through the packages to purchase, and just want to clarify that the starter, premium, and ultimate all have the same amount of lessons, the only thing that differs is the amount of practice problems and PT explanations?
Also I have two more questions:
1) Is it possible to adequately get through the core curriculum in a month
2) For those using the cambridge packets, do you drill those specific questions after the corresponding lesson. Ex. Flaw lesson completed, drill flaw questions.
Thank you for taking the time to read this message.
Just got the book. What's been a good method for folks as far as how to use the trainer in combo with 7 sage?
I took the June 2015 LSAT and I feel like I did good enough to get into the school that I want to get into (but I suppose we shall see within about a week!). What should I be doing until I can officially fill out the application in I believe September? In otherwords, what are some productive things that I will need to have to turn in with my application that I could go ahead and get started on? Thanks!
Hi All,
My beau is in the process of applying for jobs all over the place. Previously, I had thought that we would stay put in Chicago, which is why I was going to focus on LUC and Chicago Kent (ahem, and roll the dice on NU).
Any tips on trying to figure out applying to schools in various locations? My guy is a scientist, so the whole job search process is really topsy turvy, so I feel like I'm in a situation where I just have to cast a bunch of apps & figure things out from there. I didn't really expect to be in this situation. Adventure time? It's kind of overwhelming to try to pump myself up for a major score jump in the LSAT with the idea of applying to a bunch of schools that I'm unable to figure out, except in the virtual world.
Thanks, all!
I have been studying since January, for the October test. On July 4th I plan to make the big transition to the PT stage for the final three months.
However, I am finding Logic Games to be very, very deadly!
Currently on 21 of 35 sets in the LG bundle and I can still barely complete a game (aside from simple sequencing) without having to turn to the video - and that's after 30/40 minutes on each game.
I read on here of many folks who have nailed LG by the time they start PTing, and I am worried that I have slipped far behind with this section.
Did others enter the PT stage still really struggling with LG? I should be able to improve lots in 3 months, but it's going to need to be done while PTing.
Anywords of wisdom, violin playing, welcomed!
Are existing users who purchased the Ultimate package going to have the option to upgrade to Ultimate + once it becomes available?
Getting a little frustrated with all of the sudden changes. :/
@"Alan Cheuk" is there any way for the option to minimize topics stay minimized, even if we go to a different page and back to the course? i thought it didn't save between different computers, and am now realizing going back and forth pages will remove all the clicking i did to minimize topics?
Recently, I have noticed a glitch on the site regarding play speed on the videos. While using the app and the site through multiple browsers, I can't increase the play speed. I only have this issue on Samsung Note Pro 12.2. When I am using a PC, it's fine. Any ideas?
can someone please go through this with me?
http://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-22-section-2-question-07/
I heard that once forgotten games are reappearing ..
Is that mean all those circular mapping games are appearing as well?
Also, does 7sage offer a course about pattern game??
I somehow can't find it...
I didn't even look at those forgotten games..
Hello all,
Add/message me on Skype (nikkers625) if you want to join the BR group tonight!
For most of the lessons there is both a video portion and a written article portion. Are these designed to complement each other, or do they say essentially the same thing? In the interest of time, I have generally been picking one or the other for each lesson, and only reading and watching the video together if I really need help understanding the topic. Sorry if this is a redundant question, I couldn't find it discussed elsewhere on the site.
As most of you know, my original plan was to start my studies by completing the trainer. But I am really thinking about using 7sage as the main curriculum because I find it a lot harder to read and focus with my son around. I also try reading at work,which is more successful than doing so at home, but it is a very slow process. I am making progress but I am not able to adhere to the schedule provided by the trainer and I am at least two weeks behind in drills! Smh. I think maybe if I had 7sage's video course I could move through the curriculum faster and have more time to effectively drill since I won't be as tired from reading.
I spend most of my time attempting to read the chapter, getting interrupted during drills, and then going to work only to be met with more interruptions. After my chaotic studies are over for the day, I wake up the next day and barely remember a thing lol. Then the vicious cycle starts all over again. A slow, grueling, non-efficient process that doesn't allow me to maximize my full potential. By no means do I think it will be a magic solution, but I think using the 7sage course will be more beneficial because of my lifestyle. I can simply sit back and actively listen, which is a lot less time consuming than actively reading. What do you guys think? Anyone else experiencing a similar issue?
I am really struggling on making these distinct. I can recognize the stems, but the answers are gnarly for me.
Any advice? I am going through the trainer right now, and I'll have to review, but he seems to be rather brief on these, especially Required vs. Sufficient.
The biggest clue I can read is that the sufficient answers can be crazy, and mention weird things. But, obviously, this is not enough. I am totes struggling, and any help is appreciated. I'm thinking I should get Cambridge now.
Hey! I'm thinking about starting July1st studying for the October write. I already bought the LSAT Trainer and was wondering whether I should do the 7sage premium course after I read the LSAT Trainer, or read the LSAT Trainer after 7sage.
Also what are your thoughts on LG, I heard 7sage is enough for LG so should I skip the LSAT Trainer section on LG to prevent confusion?
I am having a difficult time figuring out how to negate a sentence that is comprised of both "most" and "conditional statements."
For example, if one says, "most people who study at least 5 hours a day for LSAT will get 180," how can we negate this?
Thank you guys!
I'm a little over a month into studying after first starting with the lsat trainer (50% completed) and basic 7sage course (30%) completed. I'm confused as to what my focus should be on right now with an anticipated test date of Oct 2015. What additional materials should I buy for drilling...and when exactly does that come into play following the 7sage syllabus?