... a bit confused on what PTs to blind review with. I ... 've done the first 4 PTs, and they're going well ... that the later, more recent PTs are more representative of the ...
I've been averaging 157 on a few older (30s-40s) PTs and tried 51. Got smashed with a 150. Is PT51 pretty indicative of later/more recent PTs or is PT51 harder than normal?
... been taking full (4 section) PTs as I study and I ... that on my past 4 PTs I've consistently scored better ... />
These recent PTs were all in the 80s and I've ...
With the new format being introduced in August (4 sections, 1 being unscored), are you taking PTs with a Flex format (3 sections) or the traditional format of 4 scored sections? I'm not really sure how to best approach it
... almost all of the PTs in the 60s - 80s starting with my ... burned through the most recent PTs. To prepare for the June ... test, I've been doing PTs in the 50s which were ... I forget the more recent PTs or is it dumb to ...
... all of the 70s and 80s). This summer, I'll be ... summer doing solely problems from PTs 35 and earlier (core curriculum ... back up with full length PTs starting in September or October ...
I took many of the PTs on LSAC LawHub prior to purchasing 7sage. Is there any way I could transfer the data from those tests so analytics can be created without me having to retake the tests on this platform? Thanks in advance
... take practice tests in the 80s and am seeing a nosedive ... much less straightforward in the 80s? Also, do we have every ... level for LR in the 80s is the most indicative of ...
hi! i'll be writing in october and was wondering which PTs i should focus on? are the older ones more indicative of the current LSAT or the newer ones better to review? if anyone has recently taken an LSAT i'd love to know your input!