1:08 Long Island mention, Strong Islanders rise up!

TIL that screensavers once had a functional purpose other than just looking nice. Can't lie, this revelation lost me at least 5 seconds of time from the shock!

@springmoon83 Me too, which I've noticed is a common thread for me LOL

JY diagrammed the stim out as:

/edu —> ep-weak

/ep-weak —> edu —> commit

But I diagrammed it as:

/edu —> ep-weak

edu —> commit —> /ep-weak

It took forever for me to ultimately get the right answer but is there something fundamentally wrong with where I placed /ep-weak? I though because the stim says "so any nation with a government that has made such a commitment will avoid economic and political weakness," it would place /ep-weak all the way to the right of the causual chain.

I'm not huge on diagramming and I know he said we should be doing this in our head but I'm stuck on whether or not my general reasoning of causation is flawed. Please help!

@ananasanonyme Extremely helpful, thank you!!

@NathanielWright This was so helpful, thank you!

I was pretty stuck between C & D until I negated both — C would not destroy the validity of the conclusion if negated whereas D would!

C improved the reasoning but it is not necessary to the reasoning.

@dexter310 same like i didn’t realize how much i needed that lmaoo

@cwferrari Same here!!

#Feedback - In the Answer Choice E explanation, ladder should be spelled like latter

@inadsiwel I was thinking the exact same thing but after I kept re-reading it (and taking too much time in doing so) I came to the same conclusion that @malenamorroco48710 so elegantly explained. Tricky!

@SoluObiorah That's exactly why I didn't choose D.

@Sunday_Blues13 Totally, it's insane that I didn't spot it before.

Man somehow I thought the word "resultant" was referring to WHY the rush hour traffic flow increased, not the result of increasing the capacity of the bridge. Smh!

@adc411 I hate that you're right!!!

@KatiaMiles I completely agree. Been having a hard time with making the distinction, including in the cat vs. dog example here.

@cdietlin501 This was happening to me when I was using Safari. It has since stopped after switching to Chrome. Usually restarting the page would make it go back to normal.

Reminder:

Group 1 Indicators indicate sufficient conditions

Ex: If, When, Where, All, Every, Any

Translation Rule: The idea immediately following the conditional indicator is the sufficient condition.

...whereas...

Group 2 Indicators indicate necessary conditons

Ex: Only, Only if, Only when, Only where, Always, Must

Translation Rule: The idea immediately following the logical indicator is the necessary condition

@codybrowning69 your interpretation of "right" vs. "rights" was actually so helpful, thank you!

@bmo562 lmaooo same

Hi friends! My name is Lauren, and I am a 24 year old from NY. I graduated from Cornell University in 2023 and now work in IT at a major hospital system. After a ton of deliberation, I've decided to pursue law and start studying for the LSAT. Hoping to be in good enough shape to take it in April or June 2026. Historically, I am not a good standardized test taker but I am genuinely excited to turn that idea about myself around and kill the LSAT! Please feel free to reach out - I'd love to connect with someone else who is also on this journey :D