Columbus, OH, Anyone? Anyone? BUELLER :) Let's connect. I'd love to have a study partner.
All posts
New post491 posts in the last 30 days
Hi,
Quick question about the above referenced problem. Why is (C) correct, and (B) wrong? I personally disliked (C) because of the word "remain". Stimulus is talking about "being" free (and "becoming" free), not about "remaining".
TIA!
Proctors:
Morning test start, so make sure you arrive at David Turpin building at the very latest 8:30am. The check-in will be right in the main floor when you enter in the building.
Facilities:
David Turpin Building - Large Class Room - Holds a couple hundred students
What kind of room:
The seating rows are like stadium seating sloping down towards the chalkboard
How many in the room:
I would approximate the attendance to be close to 150 students
Desks:
Large tables with swivel chairs that are very uncomfortable and do not allow for much adjustment because they are fastened to the tables.
Left-handed accommodation:
Yes
Noise levels:
Noise levels are very good. Very few distractions.
Parking:
Parking is also very good with a huge stadium parking lot right across the road from the test taking building. Because the tests are done on Saturday there is usually plenty of space and I only had to pay $2.50 for the whole day.
Time elapsed from arrival to test:
Arrival time 8:30 - Finish time 1:40pm October 2015 write date (it was very unorganized for this write date)
Arrival times 8:30 - Finish time 12:40pm February 2016 write date
Irregularities or mishaps:
In October 2015 there was a section that no 5 minute warning was announced which was frustrating for many test takers that day. The staff at the February write were much more organized and more pleasant to deal with.
Other comments:
Would you take the test here again?
Yes, definitely. Although it would be nice to have more comfortable chairs for the 4 hour experience.
Date[s] of Exam[s]:
Oct. 2015 and Feb. 2016
Hi everyone I thought it would be cool to see if anyone on here is planning on attending MH this fall!
I had been working from 62-71 for most of my prep this time and had done 29-38 previously. I meant to order 52-61 to use for some drill so I could work on my weaker sections. But I found that I accidentally ordered another volume of 62-71. Would it be better for me to actually use that and retake some sections of PTs I had done, as my original copy is heavily annotated, or to return it and get the volume I meant to have?
Is there a way to create a problem set based on a specific type of RC question? Based on my trends I need to work on meaning of phrase in context and application of hypothetical situations. Is it possible to create questions sets with that filter or are RC problem sets simply based on full passages.
Anyone else taking it at the tourist nightmare hotel across from Penn Station?
Anyone taking it there in a few days?
Any suggestions or tips on maintaining the energy level during test (outside of doing more full test)? I find the first section I am great then something breaks midway through the second section. Thanks in advance.
Subscribe to the podcast:
Choosing a law school is one of the hardest parts of the admissions process, not because you do not have options, but because you finally do. In this episode, @JacobBaska breaks down what it actually means to deposit, how that differs from enrolling, when it makes sense to ask for a deposit deadline extension, and how to think through waitlists, pending decisions, scholarship timing, and even the possibility of retesting or reapplying.
Jake also walks through the bigger-picture questions that should shape your final choice: rank, cost, scholarship money, job outcomes, geography, student culture, and whether a school genuinely feels like the right fit for your next three years and beyond. If you are staring at multiple offers, waiting on one last decision, or wondering whether it is okay to double deposit, this episode gives you a practical framework for making the call with confidence.
Hi! Have noticed a trend among some of my recent wrong answers, wondering if anyone has any insights into this. Twice in one LR drill, I got the question wrong because I was unwilling to equivocate two terms. Ex: The stimulus was talking about “a new trend in the writing of history”, and the correct AC used the term “interpretation” to mean the said new trend. Again in that same section I missed a question talking about “experience” in the stimulus, with the correct AC using the word “expertise” instead.
The first question was a MSS, and the second a PSA… both rated as lower difficulty levels. The correct ACs were the ones I had originally been drawn to on both, but steered away from due to not wanting to falsely equivocate different terms! Any insight into this or advice would be very helpful!
These questions both came from PT127.S3, questions 3 and 15
Split screen support would be really helpful for tablet users.
My eyes are getting too much exercise from reading 1/32 inches letters on my goodnotes.
Hi,
I was doing PT 70 and was wondering,
Do you think section 4 is harder than section1?
I think I had this experience before too...when one of the LR section is relatively easy, the other one is kind of hard...
Is this true? Or am I the only one who felt so?
Hi all,
#help
I’ve been working through MBT/MBF questions and have experienced some difficulties. Namely, the speed that’s required for diagraming every situation. I have a solid understanding of the logic and, during blind review, am able to work my way to the correct answer. However, during a timed test I find it difficult, if not impractical, to completely diagram every stimulus. Has anyone else experienced this issue? Do any of you have strategies that discern when diagraming is necessary and when intuition suffices?
I know this is a speed test, and I’m starting to think that working through the logic of every question sends me down a time drain.
I’d be very grateful to anyone that could share their thoughts on this!!
Thanks :)
PT53 BR Tonight at 8pm ET
It's your favorite day of the week.
Note on all groups
I don't understand the correct answer for this one at all. Can someone breakdown why all the wrong ones are correct and D is correct? Here is my breakdown:
http://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-65-section-3-passage-3-questions/
Answer A: This is what I picked both times, I don’t really see what’s wrong with it. Doesn’t legally requiring something describe US/Canadian law while not legally requiring it parallel Roman law? To me, this is perfect…
Answer B: Roman law didn’t make anything illegal, so this isn’t it.
Answer C: Roman law didn’t distinguish between legality, so this isn’t it.
Answer D: Completely dumbfounded how this could possibly be the answer. Roman law didn’t make blackmail illegal outright. You had to show harm, and THAT made it illegal. I don’t see how this is analogous to Roman law in the slightest…
Answer E: Higher fines? Roman law didn’t have harsher punishment.
Hi, is there any way to download practice test score reports with the new 7sage? I believe the classic 7sage allowed this but I'm not seeing the option to do so with the new one. Thank you.
Hi I'm planning to take the LSAT Oct 2022 or later and was wondering if anyone else who's not planning to take the LSAT anytime soon wanted to form a study group
Hello! I saved my password on my personal computer and sometimes i need to login to a school computer to print some workouts, it prevents me from logging into another computer. And if i try too many times, it allows me to login as a free account. wield...
Hey guys! Is there anyone in Toronto working full time and taking July LSAT that would want to start a study group for PTs and BR?
http://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-57-section-3-question-12/
So, what's the deal w/ effective laws? How would you approach this one, in terms of a thinking through it strategy? I chose B originally, though I understood that this was not the contrapositive of the statements in the stimulus. I'm not quite getting how the international police force is a necessary condition for int law to be effective. This may be the result of mental fatigue, so please don't judge me here (:
Politics aside, this is a fun read to warm up for logical flaw description questions. "A CONSERVATIVE GUIDE TO RHETORIC" http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/shouts/2013/10/conservative-guide-to-rhetoric-republican-quotations.html
Anyone in Montréal this summer looking for a study group?
Listen and subscribe:
Two friends, two completely different LSAT study strategies—so who’s right? In this episode, @AlexJacobs and @BaileyLuber explain how to structure your week with PTs, timed sections, and targeted drills to build toward a 175+ without burning out.
