All posts
New post637 posts in the last 30 days
Hello 7sagers,
I was just wondering if I started a masters program and did not complete it do I have to put that school on my application for example lsac . I just want to know if a withdrawal or W in a institution I no longer want to attend wouldn’t look so good on my application. Is it possible I don’t have
To bring up the school at all ?
16personalities.com
There is a lot of good criticism of the personality test, but I still think it's interesting to discuss..esp. in ctxt of the LSAT. Wondering if certain personality types (like analysts) actually tend to do better on the LSAT. I found very limited data with a google search. Thought the forum could be a good place to talk about it, criticize the test, and perhaps get into a nature vs. nurture debate :)
-Sam
Hi Guys, I need your help and perspectives with my gap year activities and will it affect my school application for 2018-2019
I graduated Chemical Engineering with a lot of projects and grants for research under my belt. I was also in the top 10% of my graduating year. I took the LSAT last December and got a very dissappointing score, partly because I was burnt out by the time I graduated, so I took a long overdue vacation and studying for the LSAT took a back seat. Next thing I knew, I have 2 months to prep for the December test. (This is entirely my fault)... I am prepping for the June but could be adjusted to July or September (I just checked the LSAC website and they will be offering it on these months). I am feeling okay with my PT, Ive only taken 4 after going over the CC. But what I am worried about the lack of progress on my resume...
On top of the statement above, I havent worked after graduating due to several ( I guess, common) issues. We had to move after my December LSAT and I am applying to law firms even as an IP assistant, but it seems like my degree is close to worthless in law firms. Also, I have been trying to juggle studying for the LSAT 6+ hrs per day, taking care of our son, and looking for a house (currently renting right now). Although, I am in the process of volunteering for Women Shelter I am just worried that admission will see a flaw, even with a decent LSAT and GPA but long gap... Any ideas on how this will be perceived by admission? and what to do about it?
I will be looking for a full time job either in Law, Science, or be a full time volunteer at the shelters AFTER the LSAT
I feel like this should be really obvious... If I've narrowed my choice down to 2 schools and want to relinquish my seat at other schools I've been accepted to so that people can get off the waitlist, is there an easy way to do that? Or do people just have to wait until I put in my final seat deposit? I don't see an easy link on most admitted students websites, is that something we do through LSAC? Or should I email admissions?
Idk why I'm struggling with this but I thank everyone in advance for their help! :)
Hello everyone,
I'm Jelani and recently I scored a 151 on the February Lsat. I'm planning on taking the July Lsat but thought having a study group would be extremely helpful this time around. I currently live in Long Island but I work in Staten Island, so i'm willing to travel all over.
I am having difficulty with strengthen/weaken questions and noticed that Nicole Hopkins' webinar on Strengthen and Weaken questions from two years ago was mentioned in numerous threads. Is there a way to access that webinar or is there a webinar currently available that is similar to the one she created? Thank you!
hey all
i graduated college in 2017. I started studying for the LSAT in July 2017 with intention to take it in September or December. Well, the LSAT is really hard and when September and December rolled around, I wasn't ready. I've been studying for the LSAT full time since around July 2017 and have made a lot of progress from my initial diagnostic score. I am planning to take the LSAT in either July or September 2018, and then hopefully send out law school apps in fall 2018.
Given that I've spent almost an entire year studying for the LSAT full time, do i or should i or how should i explain this resume gap in my law school applications?
During my period of full time studying, i've done some volunteering at my local church, but have not taken on a full-time job because i realized i needed more time for LSAT prep.
I saw TLS1776's on TopLawSchools LSAT prep sticker, and how he took of an entire year to full time prep for the LSAT, and then scored a 180.
For me, the LSAT has been taking me a lot longer to prepare (and tougher!) than initially expected, but I would rather spend 1 year of intensive full time study than drag out LSAT prep to 2 or 3 years if I had taken a 50-hour week job instead.
FYI: I've done summer analyst position internships at large Fortune 500 companies during my summers in undergrad, so I have had professional work experience. It was only after graduation that I realized I wanted to go to law school, and started studying for the LSAT.
would love anyone's advice or feedback. thanks!
Does anyone know the difference between "reserve" and "hold" waitlists? My friend and I got these two different ones. I asked the admissions office but they didn't tell me outright which one is better or worse-- they just said that they're "different."
I know that HLS is among the top 5 law schools on ratings, there is a certain image, prestige, and level of success to attend such a school. I imagine being a HLS grad opens doors to unique opportunities (e.g. jobs) and has wide range of resources for one to access.
It's really expensive, and other law schools teach basically the same stuff.
But, are there other reasons why HLS is a desired destination? Why Harvard?
Do you guys have any recommendations on standing desks i could get in law school. Extended times of sitting increases likelihood of developing cardiovascular issues. Do you have any tips on how to focus while reading and standing up?
Hi all, I posted this question on some other forums and there was a lot of division in the discussion so I've decided to post here as well for some further input.
I plan on applying to law school next cycle and I'm considering writing a diversity statement, but I'm not sure if I qualify/it would hurt my chances of admission.
Basically, growing up I was raised by a lesbian couple in a overwhelmingly Mormon neighborhood in the heart of Utah (I'm an IVF baby). I believe that because of my family background, I faced heavy discrimination/adversity growing up and that this adversity has heavily shaped the person that I am today. For example, in grade school most kids were disallowed/discouraged from talking or interacting with me due to my family background. I wasn't invited/allowed to participate in birthday parties, sleepovers, etc. Relentless bullying in school, teachers discriminated against my parents and I as well, and much much more.
Personally, I feel like this qualifies for a diversity statement, but I have two reservations...
I'm an otherwise normal straight white male, and I'm worried that this might disqualify me from being able to write a diversity statement. From reading around, it seems many believe that my position of privilege from my race/gender excludes experiencing the adversity that other LGBT/minority applicants have faced. It might sound silly, but I am worried that an admissions officer might disagree that my background qualifies as true diversity, and that this might negatively impact my application.
Clearly, the anti-LGBT stance of the Mormon church was one of the chief causes/influences of the adversity that I faced while young. I'm worried that if I write a diversity statement, it may come off as anti-religion, or otherwise offend the admissions council of these law schools.
What do you all think about this situation? Do you think I can write a diversity statement, or do you think it would be best to avoid the topic?
Hi 7Sage,
Heads up! On May 31, we’re increasing the price of Admissions Unlimited to $699. We’ll sell twenty-five more packages at the old price of $599. If and when those sell out, you’ll be able to purchase Admissions Unlimited at the new price.
What’s Admissions Unlimited?
Admissions Unlimited entitles you to as many rounds of editing as you need in order to brainstorm, draft, polish, and proofread one essay.
If you hire us for help on a personal statement that you haven’t started, we’ll begin by sending you a list of prompts. When we see your answers, we’ll schedule a phone call to continue brainstorming and outline your essay. Afterwards, we’ll play ping pong: you’ll send us a draft, we’ll send it back to you with notes, and so on. Our feedback tends to focus first on big-picture issues of structure and story before funneling down to more specific issues of language and tone, ending finally with a triple proofread: first by you, then by us, then by a third-party professional.
You can use Admissions Unlimited for any sort of essay or résumé, not just a personal statement, and we’re happy to work on essays that you’ve already drafted.
I think of Admissions Unlimited as our foundational service. We believe that editorial guidance lies at the heart of any consulting service—you are, after all, presenting yourself to an admissions office via essays—and we tend to hire consultants with a deep background in creative writing and editing. This product is about as far into our wheelhouse as you can get, and it’s what many of us are doing in our free time: brainstorming ideas for stories, then refining, revising, and re-envisioning them until they shine. We won’t spoon-feed you sentences or help you realize our vision for your personal statement: we’ll try to make your essay more itself.
If you’re looking for advice and guidance on every aspect of your application—including all essays—you should consider Comprehensive Consulting, but Admissions Unlimited is a great choice for price-conscious 7Sagers who want to take advantage of our core expertise.
Why are you increasing the price?
The short answer is that we want to pay our editors more and give you a better experience. For example, we set the price before we included a third-party proofread.
The longer answer is that our pricing is unbalanced. We originally believed Admissions Unlimited would take about three rounds of editing on average, so we priced it at three times an Edit Once. In reality, most of our Admissions Unlimited customers require more than three rounds—occasionally, many more. (It really is unlimited). We think the new price is a better reflection of our time and costs.
Can I buy Admissions Unlimited now and use it later?
Yes! Admissions Unlimited doesn’t go stale. You can buy it at the old price and sit on it until you’re ready to use it, or you can get a head start on your applications for this fall.
Thanks for reading, everyone!
Any suggestions on how to "foolproof" LR, especially LR questions you got wrong?
Also, any advice on how to get better at identifying and understanding LR cookie cutters? Thanks!
Office Hours with @"Accounts Playable" (Admissions-related)
Hey 7Sagers,
Sage David, a.k.a. @"Accounts Playable", will be offering office hours! This time, David will be answering your admissions-related questions.
David scored a 174 on the June 2016 LSAT and has been admitted to Harvard Law School in his second cycle of applying to law schools.
So bring your questions! Don't miss this chance!
Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone.
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/945314133
You can also dial in using your phone.
United States: +1 (669) 224-3412
Access Code: 945-314-133
Joining from a video-conferencing room or system?
Dial: 67.217.95.2##945314133
Cisco devices: 945314133@67.217.95.2
First GoToMeeting? Let's do a quick system check: https://link.gotomeeting.com/system-check
Hey everyone,
I'm taking a step back and redoing the CC. When I first did it, I went through it too fast to internalize what I learned.
After abandoning the LSAT for a while, I've decided to come back strong for one last shot.
I want to hit 170+ and am around the 150 range right now.
My plan in order:
1.) Go through The LSAT Trainer (BOOK), while building up my RC skill.
2.) Mastering LR by revisiting the CC, mainly focusing what I most need improvement on.
3.) Pacifico’s Logic Games Attack Strategy
4.) PTs and BR.
Ill supplement my learning watching webinars, visiting discussion pages, and engaging with the 7Sage community.
I hope to make it in time for the Sept test, but we'll see.
Any other recommendations, advice or feedback? I definitely need it. (I imagine I'll be tweaking my study schedule a bit).
What's your plan?
Edit*
Here is Pacifico’s Logic Games Attack Strategy:
https://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/2737/logic-games-attack-strategy/p1
Hey everyone,
I'm applying to schools next fall, and I've been getting a bit stressed out by the forums recently. It seems like applicants with great LSAT scores are getting WL'ed or rejected at schools they would typically be accepted at. I was just wondering if anyone knows if this is a trend that will continue into next year.
I got approved for 50% extra time accommodations recently and I was wondering if I should be taking PTs and timed sections with the 52 minutes instead of the 35 minutes? Somewhere in-between?
Just wondering what some others with extra time are doing?
TY!
Hey all,
I know Blind reviewing is usually done before one looks at the answers, where one thinks to himself why one answer choice is 100% right and the other four are 100% wrong.
I wanted to hear your thoughts on "Blind reviewing" after you watch JY's LR video explanation. What I mean by this is that after you watch the video, maybe have some time distance away from that specific LR problem (like 1 or 2 days), and then go back to that question you got wrong and then really think and explain to yourself why 1 answer is 100% right and the other 4 are 100% wrong.
Granted, this is after you already watched the video explanation, but with this you're testing yourself to see if you REALLY understood the question and why you got it wrong...rather than tricking yourself that you fully understood the question simply because you watched JY's video explanation when in actuality you perhaps didn't really understand it. With this method, by dissecting wrong questions after having watched JY's video explanation, you're also trying to understand any "cookie cutter" lesson to be learned from that question, or find any general LR pattern.
I've heard top scorers do something similar to this where they cut out all their wrong LR questions and then review them scrupulously (re-resolve them, break down the grammar, fully analyze wrong answer choices and the right one, etc.) from time to time.
I've been realizing that sometimes when I redo LR questions, I get a same question wrong AGAIN, so this is just a way to really force myself to fully learn from my past mistakes. My LR score has for sometime hit a wall (-3/-4 per section) and i'm hoping to use this method of reviewing wrong LR questions to improve (granted I also blind review in the normal sense where I BR before looking at the right AC).
What are your thoughts 7sage?
Thanks.
I graduated from undergrad over 10 years ago. However my UGPA is low due to me being young and partying for 4 years straight. I would be attending law school with the sole focus of exploring opportunities within entertainment law as the industry is where I have been working within for the past 8 years.
Will my GPA be given as much weight as it would have right out of college?
Will it prevent me from getting into law school?
I will shoot for a high LSAt as well as have LOR from very prominent people in the music industry.
Hi all,
I've taken the LSAT before and scored a 164. I am currently PTing around 168-171. I'm retaking in June and would like to solidify my understanding of LR by helping someone who is scoring average to below average. If you are interested, please comment below or send me a direct message.
Thanks!
I go to a small liberal arts honors college (New College of Florida) which doesn't offer traditional grades. All of my classes are pass/fail and have a narrative evaluation system. Some of the places I've talked to don't want to see my evals at all, and will just bank my application on my LSAT. How much higher should I try to score to convince these schools to admit me?
Does anyone else have experience applying to schools with no GPA?
My diagnostic was 143.
Out of 4 tests in the past 4 weeks, my actual scores range from 149 to 159. I finished the CC several months ago. Ever since, I have been drilling and along some fool proofing. I have been trying to raise my competence in all sections, which is why I haven't done the1-36 fool proof yet. There has at least been some success in my efforts, as my BRs range from 172 to 177 - I don't know what my BR would have been on my diagnostic - I didn't know BR existed at the time.
I do take breaks every once and awhile. I've actually been taking a break for 4 days now, and I might stay away from any material for another day or two. I have been studying for this test since June of 2017 (I took August off because I was starting two new jobs and moved to new apartment). Given the fact that I have spent 9.5 months on the LSAT, as you can probably imagine, I'm conflicted with my progress. On one hand I am happy to see my BR be in the mid 170s; it took many hours and nights to get there. However, most importantly, I am frustrated that I'm averaging a 153 (roughly -7 to -10 on all section types). Some of this is attributed to lack of confidence/fear/anxiety, I'm sure. But, I've been around on these forums for quite some time now, and I don't recall seeing too many posts about people who have as great a difference between one's actual score vs BR score, which is unsettling.
I've read countless articles about this test, and my many hours of reading and research are telling me that speed is simply a measure of your level of understanding. So, how do I achieve that type of understanding? It seems that doing 35 minute timed sections isn't doing much for me at the moment, other than freak me out. Should I time myself doing a section and not stress the 35 minutes instead? It's weird because if I do timed sections in 35 minutes right now, I could form bad habits because I will be rushing. Too, I could form bad habits by doing sections with more time than what is normally allowed. Any suggestions as to what I should do in this respect? Should it be a combination of both?
My plan at the moment is to fool proof LG 1-36 and to get that down to -0. I also think focusing on LR and RC on the weekends so as to maintain what I have would be a good idea, but I plan on spending the bulk of weekdays doing full sections of LG and really trying to dissect how the games work. Beyond the fool proofing though, I really am at a loss as to what to do.
Thank you for your time.
P.S. - My goal is 170. My goal for quite some time now has been to take this thing in September - but the likelihood of that is decreasing as the days go by.
#help
I have a quick question that I was hoping some of the more experienced LSAT takers might be able to answer (or maybe JY himself).
In one of the first couple of Reading Comp videos, JY says that if you don't understand something, you'll just let it slide. But often, it will just snowball into a bigger and bigger misunderstanding.
Later, in several of the other videos, JY says that it's important to be able to compartmentalize things that you don't understand, and to not let them impact your efficiency in dissecting the rest of the passage, since it might not be worth spending all that time trying to understand something that turns out to be relatively insignificant.
Can someone please help me reconcile this apparent discrepancy (had to make the LR joke :p )? Does anyone have ways of determining when it's necessary to fully understand something versus when it's not? If you could share some of your own experiences and results that would be awesome.
Thanks so much.
The questions is regarding the computer simulations vs. actual test crashes. Why B cannot be the answer? Is that because "highly likely" is not good enough to be a premise? Could anyone share your ideas? Thank you.
https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-81-section-3-question-12/
Admin note: edited title
Registered late and the only option for me was Hilton..
Am I going to take a test inside the hotel? Did anyone took a test there? How was your experience.