Can anyone talk about a logical equivalency to this phrase? Not "IF", but is it equivalent to "only if"? Or how should I interpret this phrase in LR questions - I've come across it a few times in the late 60s tests.
What is a major premise and a sub conclusion? Also what are other terminology words that I will need to know in relation to logical reasoning questions?
I have been crushing it lately in Logic Games when I do timed sections/tests, but can't seem to improve at all on LR. I am thinking of going back through most of the LR curriculum, but I wanted to hear from you all on your ...
I've found my LR scores took a hit ever since I began adopting time management strategies like skipping and doing the first 15 questions in 15 minutes. When I go back and look at the ones I missed the correct answer is typically clear but under timed ...
... as close to perfect on logical reasoning as possible. I'm ... range of 165-170 with logical reasoning varying from -10 to ... I usually get wrong in logical reasoning, with some occasional flaw ...
I just finished a PT that made use twice of "it is," in english to convey logic, in one SA question. This indicator is not in the CC and honestly, thinking about if the word following "it is" was necessary or sufficient slowed me down drastically.
...
I am having a hard time recognizing when I should draw out the argument structure to help me with the question
(A---->B ect...)
When do you decide it will be most helpful to visually represent the argument structure to help answer the ...