This is so BS.

@hataie it is a comparative imo. Because 'most people' imply that there's a subset of people that are NOT most.

Dom did better in his LSAT drills today than 3 weeks ago. He was using 7Sage.

NGL, this is one of the most incoherent exercises/skill builders. Instructions are super vague which leads to us not really understanding the objective of the entire lesson let alone the exercise.

Forget Scorsese. I'm going to pitch Christopher Nolan an idea for Inception 2 ;)

Dayum. Sentence 3 really tripped me up.

Easy Peasy!

@Lia24788 yes and no. I just equate modifiers to 'white noise' in a sentence. That's the best I can muster.

I'm improving (137 on the cold diagnostic) but I feel like I've got a long way to go :(

@GGG Agreed. But thankfully there's the MIRO board. I'd be livid if he didn't post it there.

I say I scored 4.5/5 because the last question tripped me up. I answered:

Concession: Notwithstanding the planet Dune being a desert, 

Premise: it was revered and 

conclusion: considered invaluable by the people.

But oh well, I'll take what I can get :D

1/5. I found this extremely confusing. Would appreciate it if someone here can help explain it in a more simpler manner? I'm at my wits end :(

The double premises are tripping me up - 3/5 :((((

3/5 :(((((((((

Boom! 5/5 again :D

5/5. Finally getting some full scores on this!

4/5 - but I'm happy given I had a 137 on my LSAT diagnostic so I'll take what I can get. Giggidy.

Hi all...I'm Dom and I hail from Ontario, Canada. Planning to take the LSAT in August and would love to connect with anyone here who is planning to go to law school as a mature student (I'm 46!)