It could just be me, but some of these SA questions I am getting right very easily, and others I cannot make sense of them for the life of me. This is going to be a long unit.

4/5 then 4/5 after 2 tries. Not 100% but i will take 80% at this rate

Querying

That was a level 1? wow

I second guessed D because of the word "serious" accidents lol

@Christuck.r felt that exact way in blind review. Lol

@TeklaCo Same here

Wow I cannot believe I answered this one correctly. So far I have been a huge why would I map out lawgic, and I needed it for this question to get it correct. Without lawgic there is no chance I would have answered this question correctly.

Brutal

I got AC D fairly quickly but took awhile second guessing myself because it just seemed to simple of an AC to be correct. However I stuck with my gut and was correct. I think this is a good lesson to always trust your first instinct on test day.

Got it right. May have been a little (a lot) over time but at this stage I just want correct answers.

@brycekrampert I don't believe so. Since "no" is your group 4 indicator you would just simply negate ''undergo transformation"

@BrieV I had the same question as well. I have not made it through foundations yet, but I believe when we are able to apply our Lawgic to a stimulus we will be able to depict what the question is asking easier. And find out flaws or what must be true, etc.

I really just want to know how all of this applies to the questions. I want so badly to get to the point that we are learning question types and be able to use our lawgic to find and predict answers. I must stay the course.

@NovaBates lmao fr

@Cweathers Yes you would have to flip them because negating the conditional relationship your sufficient condition now becomes your necessary condition

@Littlebowpink I could be wrong, but I believe the lawgic can only be used with a conditional relationship, or a "if then" statement. Since you would have a sufficient and necessary condition.

I know I have not made it through all the curriculum, but I feel like the most important thing for me is just learning what the question types are asking you to solve and become so good at it it makes the questions easier. If that makes sense

@LuisCortez-Garcia Good luck! I too have taken it a few times 4 years ago, without proper studying or a course like 7Sage. I'm hoping this will give me the boost I need. I have been out of undergrad for a few years now so hoping my work experience helps in my application. Good luck to you this cycle!

The only thing that confuses me is when we are supposed to use our real world knowledge and not? I feel like in multiple lessons its been used and others not so much.

3/5 on my first attempt. I believe that when we learn the question types and know exactly what the question is asking, it will make these easier. At least for me. Some questions I do not know 100% what is being asked of me and can confuse me.

@AlexisNjoroge this

This has got to be a huge part of the RC section and dissecting question stems.

3/5 then a 4/5. Some come easier than others. Some question types I am having trouble with that we have not yet covered. I am looking forward to that.

4/5. First one got me