See title.
7Sage breaks down and teaches types of content for the LSAT, and then lets you practice the concepts taught in the practice modules; however, I've been told you need at least 300+ hours of studying to do well on the LSAT (achieving a score in 160s+).
Does this 300+ hours exclude the work prior to the practice modules?
Do you always recommend skipping answers like C that have extra information as soon as you see the extra info? I'd be afraid to skip the answer moving too quickly.
"which clearly harms the dismissed employees as well as the sense of security of the retained employees." - is this a subconclusion/major premise?
the premise of this subconclusion being "attempts to increase productivity decrease the number of employees."
@StephenKim from answers down below, it seems to not be an argument because it is an action of irrefutable truth. we're both aware that I'm hugging you - it cannot be disputed. versus, an argument is something I'm trying to convince you is true e.g. "everyone requires hugs because they are lonely." that claim is disputable - maybe a lonely person doesn't want/require a hug to feel less lonely.
I was thinking the first sentence was just context, not a premise for the subsidiary conclusion.