Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Michael.Cinco
About
- Username
- Michael.Cinco
- Joined
- Visits
- 2,029
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member, Sage, ⭐
Comments
-
There is such a large difference between writing PT's in the digital format vs. written that if you have the opportunity to do a PT in digital form I would take it. That being said, if finances are a concern the most important thing is that you get …
-
@FHChick99 said: Is this still happening? Yep! Link posted
-
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86368166790?pwd=T2RJcjlyZjJKSE1NOTlldlMxY1IrQT09
-
Bump: Link to the video above in case anyone is looking to join
-
@robotsoap said: Thanks Michael. Will there be a recording available to watch for those who won't be able to attend live? Unfortunately because we will be going in depth with LSAC's materials I do not think I can record and post this without…
-
Just wanted to bump this back up to the front so more people can see it and hopefully attend!
-
@Trusttheprocess said: Thanks for the help... @"Michael.Cinco" - any examples you could share? There are a few but PT83 Game 3 comes quickly to mind. I highly recommend doing that game as a litmus test for your understanding of conditi…
-
There is a video by JY in the CC that explains them succinctly. https://7sage.com/lesson/substitution-and-equivalence-theory/ (Added by Admin). What I have noticed is if the rules involved are connected to other rules via conditional logic there ar…
-
@lexxx745 said: Are you planning to go through the entire section? Just the questions people flag. If enough people show up it could be the whole section!
-
I would make sure to engage with the argument more. Think about it, what is it really saying? What's wrong with it? Do you agree with it? I feel the more engaged I am with the stimulus the better I retain it.
-
your BR score tells you alot. It is indeed your potential! What you are missing out on is in your execution of the test! It sounds like nerves are playing a role here. Point is, knowledge is half the game. You have the knowledge and brains to achie…
-
I think it's because we are still primarily students and folks who have yet to actually go to lawschool and become practicing lawyers. There seems to be alot of disillusionment in the field of law which is probably reflective in the negativity you s…
-
LSAT trainer. The methodology around reading for structure really helped me out. JY's RC explanations. Pay attention to his read through of the passage. See how he makes sense of concepts that are foreign to him (he tries to relate everything he re…
-
Another lovely 7sage success story. Congrats!!
-
I've had it happen in both. No real pattern just tackle each section as if it were real.
-
Thank you for sharing! I found similar experiences with Loophole and Foolproofing. I think loophole + 7sage + lsat trainer is the holy trinity of lsat preparation. Who knows maybe we will run into each other in the Halls of Jackman in UofT. 😁
-
I took a bit of a break from March of last year to about October. Got my best score ever in January. No one ever said the LSAT was a continuous linear process, do what you need to do.
-
I only used the highlighter during logic games to check off the fact that I accounted for a rule during the initial set up. Otherwise I'm with you, theres no real benefit to using them.
-
Yeah they're gonna take some time before you figure it all out. That's normal. Keep progressing!
-
Congrats on the LSAT score! Lawstudents.ca is a good resource. It's an active forum filled with current students and lawyers from all canadian schools. Though generally the advice they give is that all schools in Canada are generally equivalent an…
-
Hard to really figure out what's going wrong without seeing your work but I'm concerned about that error rate in LR. If you have taken two lsats already and got the same score then something has to change or you'll end up with the same score again a…
-
Hilarious!
-
This looks exciting!
-
@EveryCookCanGovern said: A tip I'd add is people should consider Occam's Razor for the harder LR questions when they are stumped. Often we are told throughout our test prep is that our bringing assumptions into the argument should be avoided …
-
This question stresses the importance of fully understanding what the conclusion is saying. It mentions that promoting a certain view CAN be damaging to an individual (ie there is some individual for which the promotion of the view is damaging) in o…
-
The test itself is not static. Though they try to balance it out with the curve, some tests are just easier than others and that's entirely due to the variability in the content relative to your own strengths and weaknesses. Not to mention the inher…
-
Short answer is yes. When you negate ALL you allow for every possibility except all. Succinctly you mentioned it perfectly that Not All X is equivalent to Some are Not X. Which allows for All are Not X
-
Do you need more full length tests? Or do you need more practice to get to your score? If you are already at your target score then use them as practice between now and your test date. If you are not yet at your target score break them up and use th…
-
Well for most of the LSAT's history Circular Reasoning was a throwaway flaw that was just never the correct answer choice. Then along came a PT in the 80's and well..you'll see
-
It may be too late for Feb but here are a couple of ideas. Read the LSAT trainer. This helped me tremendously on my path to conquering RC. I did not really jive with the 7sage's methods for RC but the trainer spoke to me. Do some RC passages then …