#Feedback. So the flaw in this question is that the argument didn't Negate B first and then negate A. But instead Negated A and then B, which is not how sufficient/necessary rules work.

Is this thinking correct?? Thanks!

I'm confused about what this means: "Again, recall that the conclusion is conditional. We’re already positing a hypothetical world where we’ve prevented all iatrogenic diseases."

Does this mean that since the conclusion is conditional, the wrong answer choices will include "prevention of all iatrogenic diseases" 

how will I know when to use this type of analysis? Will ever AC for Method of Reasoning follow this format? #help #feedback

#feedback. I'm confused how one rule gets to justified vs unjustified? Is that normal?

So for Phenomenon- Hypothesis, its possible to have a passage with no critique and just a hypothesis?

I'm also confused by what JY means when he says "Trigger" it. How does this work? #feedback

Hi! I'm confused by what Prescriptive Conclusion means? How does this help with the argument etc? #Feedback #help

#Feedback. I'm wondering if this is correct thinking: for PSAr questions, the correct answer choice should not add anything extra or new facts, or other considerations. The correct answer choice should just lay out P --> C.

I didn't see the Cost benefit analysis at the beginning which is why I got it wrong

I don't understand how we would get "misguided" from the text. I didn't choose A because of this.

I'm super confused on how A and D are different. D is wrong since it discusses what a lawmaker "thinks" but A does the exact same thing. #feedback

Hi! Is this thinking correct? The correct answer choice can never say the excerpt is an assumption? #feeback

What does "transformable" mean? #feedback

How can we tell the difficultly level of this question?

I'm a bit confused by what question types this section is dealing with? Just questions that are non-causal? What skill should I be practicing here? I've just been thinking about which AC would be most reasonable.

How do you know when the question is talking about a correlation vs Causation? Or is every question like that? Just from reading the stimulus I could not tell it was discussing a correlation. #help #feedback

hi! I don't understand what they mean by "New data that is consistent with the hypothesis being either true or false." this was in the Patterns for Wrong answers section. #feedback

I thought that paragraph 4 was presenting the solutions to the issue as the court ended up ruling in favour of Boyd? Meaning that it is the main point of the passage? #help #feedback

#help Is purpose and Main point different things?

Hi! I'm wondering if anyone understands how to identify this question as an experiment? What makes this question different from the other "Strengthening" questions we did earlier before introducing ideal experiments? I'm confused on how I would identify it

I was confused by "correctly" in A. I thought that was too big of an assumption. When in the video it says thats what helps makes A correct.

I'm still confused on the difference between Weaken and RRE questions. They keep trying to highlight a difference and I don't quite understand it. If anyone could explain that would be great!

I also Chose D. I thought that since the stimulus said that birds in suburban gardens "fly away from the vegetation" that meant that the birds were making an active effort to not hide in the vegetation. "E" didn't fit with this reasoning since it implies that the bird is trying to go to the vegetation, which didn't make sense to me when comparing to the stimulus. I'm confused!

I'm confused on how to do blind review for drills? I can't find the button anywhere. I don't see an option!

I don't understand the "Imitation" part. I did not get this from the stimulus which is why I got the question wrong. #feedback