Hi all,
I've been struggling to understand this question for quite some time.. What is clearly given in the stimulus is a one way conditional:
IF Authors blah blah... --> A work counts as being interpreted
But the right answer.. basically relies on negating the sufficient conditions given, to reach the conclusion that it can't be interpreted. So it seems to me that the question is assuming that the reverse (so biconditional) holds. I tried to justify this answer by saying that MSS inference questions aren't as strict as MBT, but I'm still a bit puzzled by the inconsistency, as in other questions, we were able to/meant to rule out wrong answers on the basis that it was a mistaken reversal.
Is it something about the wording in this stimulus that necessitates understanding of the "IF" here as a bi-conditional? I'd appreciate any insight into this question!!
Admin note: edited title
https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-78-section-3-question-24/